Lawsuit airs sales push behind robot ...

Lawsuit airs sales push behind robot surgery

There are 4 comments on the The Papillion Times story from Apr 1, 2013, titled Lawsuit airs sales push behind robot surgery. In it, The Papillion Times reports that:

The da Vinci Surgical System at a hospital in Pittsburgh. According to the maker, Intuitive Surgical Inc., 1,371 U.S. hospitals have purchased one of the robots.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Papillion Times.

Brigette

Los Angeles, CA

#1 Apr 2, 2013
Lawsuits have mounted against the makers of Da Vinci due to adverse incidents that include over-anesthetization, excessive bleeding, internal lacerations, internal burns to organs and blood vessels and even death. The site http://www.rotlaw.com/da-vinci-surgical-syste... is where I first found out about this controversy on robotic surgery.
Maria

New York, NY

#2 Jul 26, 2013
The da Vinci Surgical System by the Intuitive Surgical Inc. is facing lawsuits from people who have been severely injured by the device, based on online reports. Its side effects may include damage to the bowel, badder, blood vessels, arteries, ureters, vaginal cuff and other organs or surrounding tissue due to a risk of infections, hematomas, and burns and tears among others. Read more here http://davincisurgicalsystemlawsuit.org/
Tara Jane

Los Angeles, CA

#3 Nov 22, 2013
The FDA has seen the failure of Intuitive Surgical, manufacturer of the controversial da Vinci surgical system, to notify the public of the potential dangers caused by their product. Patient are drawn to robotic surgery because of its heavy advertising and marketing. Because of this, patients who underwent robotic surgery experienced serious and life-threatening complications. There are articles that I bumped into at http://www.davincilawsuit.us/ that may be of great help to you.

“Tell it as it is.”

Since: Jun 12

Australia

#4 Nov 24, 2013
Like Fred E. Taylor in the referred article, I also had a robotic prostatectomy. Unlike him, I carried out some research into the surgeon, found he was well known and experienced with the device. Consequently there were no problems, and the results were far better than they would have been under the manual slash and burn technique.

It seems lawyers are suing the more wealthy manufacturer for mistakes made by under trained or incompetent surgeons .

Rather like suing Cessna for the incompetence of pilots who overload the aircraft.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
topix forum misused (May '09) Fri Billy Rawhide 2
massive chinese furniture web-site and relative... Aug 27 jimheeren 1
News Advances Against Chronic Pain (Sep '12) Aug 26 Ambct617 20
News What's Vanessa Diffenbaugh reading? Aug 19 moodylarry 1
RIP Chuck (Charles Perry lll) (Feb '12) Aug 18 D Shot 24
gutter cleaning Aug 16 randall1022 1
Is There A Police Helicopter Flying Around?? (Aug '08) Aug 13 Duque_dolores 56
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palo Alto Mortgages