Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215628 Sep 10, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah...you said that same tired bullshit already.
In the end you'll have one person at your funeral.
And the only reason he'll be there is to dig the hole and put you in the ground deep enough so that you won't stink in death like you've done in life.
Troll.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215629 Sep 10, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
What...your opinion???
No one cares about your opinion let alone wants to change it.
You can believe gay marriages are "only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage" until you pass out from lack of oxygen by stating it repeatedly you dumbfuck....LOL!!!
Unfortunately I doubt many are going to follow your pied piper routine and believe you.
The only opinion is yours.

You don't speak how 'everybody'.

Idiot.
Truthsayer777

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#215631 Sep 10, 2013
Wanna live forever?

www.scribd.com/doc/31322017 ...
Post Here

Covina, CA

#215632 Sep 10, 2013
Post-its are the in thing today.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215633 Sep 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know how many relationships include 'love, attraction and commitment', that are not called marriage?
Why are you discriminating regarding the number of people?
Why are you discriminating between animals?
Why is age a factor?
However, even a child knows, any of those relationships is not the same as marriage. Especially when the couple is mom and dad. Nothing equates does it?
Smile.
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Why didn't you ask why a Chevrolet Malibu and a Nissan work truck can't get married given you seem to be just that stupid.
LOL!!!
Whoa, that one went WAY past your grade level didn't it.

Snicker.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215634 Sep 10, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Riiiiiiiight.
"Everyone".
Just not the courts. LOL!!!
I gotta know who's included in your "everyone". You, the lost soul that married your sorry ass and your 3 ragged dogs????
LOL!!!
Get lost fabricator.
Oh, sorry, forgot we needed to include your 'grade' level!

And yes, even the courts will have to acknowledge the difference.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215635 Sep 10, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
After that go back and find your other posts. The ones that don't exist.
LOL!!!
Hey...you STILL haven't advised proof or reference to "default families".
I wanna see!!!! Don't make me think you're a liar now.
I was kind of hoping your friend, Duh would help you out so I didn't have to embarrass you.

Just what don't you understand about the term 'default family'??? There's not any really big words in that...

I'm not sure I can help you though, if you get lost going back to my last post....

Snicker.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215636 Sep 10, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't posted jackSHIT as far as providing proof to even ONE of your countless claims idiot.
If anyone were to hold their breath to this claim or others as to whether or not you'd come through with backing they'd not only turn blue and die from asphyxiation but would have decayed into a pile of dust long ago.
You can't verify those things yourself?

Pay up and I'll help you.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215637 Sep 10, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah...you said that same tired bullshit already.
In the end you'll have one person at your funeral.
And the only reason he'll be there is to dig the hole and put you in the ground deep enough so that you won't stink in death like you've done in life.
Really some dumb ass comments. You're losing it boy.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215638 Sep 10, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, we will see what happens over the next year or so.......it seems that your supposed "30" states might not be "30" by the end of 2016!!!
By the way, people have posted information to you to disprove what you write......all folks like you do is call it corrupt!!!
Funny how that works eh?
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#215639 Sep 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Honey, I keep pointing out that married people need protection NOT TO PROCREATE.
Gays need protection TO HAVE SEX. And are totally incapable of mutually procreating.
You are hardly in any position to demand any 'requirements'!
just pointing out that you, as always, have no point, legalistically speaking.
show us a law (local, state or federal) regulating mating behaivior that is enacted to allow only married people to give birth. this would then link procreation as a requirement to obtain a marriage license. unless you can prove that, then you might have a point. until then, nada.
so, you STILL got NADA, kim.
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#215640 Sep 10, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>Human mating is the process whereby an individual seeks out another individual with the intention of forming a long-term intimate relationship or marriage, but sometimes for casual relationship or friendship. The human desire for companionship is one of the strongest human drives. It is an innate feature of human nature, and may be related to the sex drive. Nope, no procreation mentioned here.
another obvious failure on your part to see the correlation. even kim got the correlation.
Short pier

Covina, CA

#215641 Sep 10, 2013
Joe Walsh (Republican + Tea Party member) marked the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington by sharing his own “dream for America” on his radio show.

Joe says; that “dream” turned out to be a wish list of aspirations he has exclusively for the black community.

Joe Walsh and the Tea Party along with anything else that stick or stinks to it can jump off a short pier.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#215642 Sep 10, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently it was relevant enough for thirty plus states.
<quoted text>
By all means disprove what I wrote. Show how its factually inaccurate.
When you started arguing in this forum it was more than 30, want to make a wager that it will be less than that in the next few years?

I would put money on that

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215643 Sep 10, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
just pointing out that you, as always, have no point, legalistically speaking.
show us a law (local, state or federal) regulating mating behaivior that is enacted to allow only married people to give birth. this would then link procreation as a requirement to obtain a marriage license. unless you can prove that, then you might have a point. until then, nada.
so, you STILL got NADA, kim.
Oh sugar, I go much deeper than the law.

At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Any law that avoids that fact is a bad law.
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#215645 Sep 10, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
It's 'grammar' Einstein...not "grammer
No, it's grammy, he was talking about huh's dad's mother.
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#215646 Sep 10, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Do some research on the "male g-spot" (a.k.a. the prostate).
Uh, rather not, but thanks. Don't want something put up my ass to try and get off. Guess you do.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#215647 Sep 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh sugar, I go much deeper than the law.
At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Any law that avoids that fact is a bad law.
Which is why we often have to arrest and imprison religious fanatics that "go deeper than the law" and choose their petty belief systems and ignore our laws.

In the news all the time
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#215648 Sep 10, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
So if a state voted to make murder and rape legal and you lived in that state you would be ok with will of voters being done????
YOU CAN NOT VOTE TO TAKE AWAY RIGHTS AND PERSONAL FREEDOM IDIOT......
And if you are dumb enough to think that murder and rape would ever be legalized you really are a dope.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215649 Sep 10, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
Laws that promote freedom equality and justice are never bad.
To you Nazi pigs maybe but not normal Constitution loving people.
Godwin's Law. An internet adage. Never use Nazi analogies. Poor form. Means you forfeit.

Oh well. So sorry! Play again. Insert another nickel please.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gay/bi skype (Jun '16) 4 hr maxous_23 91
New years 95 Mon Victor and adrian 1
Complaints Against Google+ (Jul '14) Mar 26 F Google 114
Ron Fleishman is the World's Most Underrated Ph... (Sep '15) Mar 22 Trekkie 217
News Portola Valley: Suspect in January residential ... Mar 21 Liberals are dumb 1
Help IDENTIFY who "they" are Mar 19 Abdt123 1
News 2 schools named after eugenics advocates to get... Mar 19 CodeTalker 2

Palo Alto Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palo Alto Mortgages