Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201844 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Big D

Modesto, CA

#203144 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Look up human mating behavior.
There is no requirement with regard to mating behavior for a marriage license.

Look it up, and then go find another argument that we will rip to shreds.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#203145 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It is an ugly reality isn't it?
It is one thing for a child to be deprived of their mother by accident. It is wholly another issue to deliberately do so.
That is the ugly reality of what you and your partner did in a vain effort to manufacture a fake family and imposter marriage.
I'm sure they'll provide a lovely home for a child.

You should be wishing them good will instead of being a turd.

But then again why should we expect anything else from you?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#203146 Jul 17, 2013
Just ME wrote:
The bible defines marriage between a man and a woman. Theres no bible that sways from that definition. Gay marriages may be legal now, but in most peoples eyes, youre all just perverted people living together. You may be able to legally be married, a privile given to you by humans... but in gods eyes youre detestable and unworthy of his approval. Youre all spitting on the one special arrangement he set for humanity to be enjoyed by a man and a woman. Lets see how well your marriage does on judgment day.
Oooooooh, I'm shaking in my boots over your imaginary Sky Santa and his "judgement day". Oooooooohhh.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#203147 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. I have given the social science essence of marriage. That is why you have no defense for it.
All of the things I listed are unchangeable realities that distinguish between SS couples and marriage.
SS couples are clearly NOT the same as marriage.
If only you could quote a legitimate social scientist who defines marriage as you do...

You can't. They do not exist. Your definition is contrived; a lie.

Please stop blatantly lying if you wish to be taken seriously.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203150 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure that is what you are guessing. You seem to guess a lot of ugly things. Because you're an ugly person. Like most fundamentalist Christians.
Smile.
Nice!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#203151 Jul 17, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure they'll provide a lovely home for a child.
You should be wishing them good will instead of being a turd.
But then again why should we expect anything else from you?
They deliberately deprived children of a mother.

But what does that matter to you, you damned the children.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203152 Jul 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are free to have believe in whichever book you want to in this country
but there are people legally married that donít believe in your little religion too.
and people of different religions that believe in many different gods and many different religious laws.
and people of no religion at all
Your little book has nothing whatsoever to do with marriage and how it is defined under US Law
-You are free to have believe in whichever book you want to in this country

Gee thanks!

-but there are people legally married that donít believe in your little religion too.

Really? Duh.

-and people of different religions that believe in many different gods and many different religious laws.
and people of no religion at all

WOW!

-Your little book has nothing whatsoever to do with marriage and how it is defined under US Law

His little book?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203153 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oooooooh, I'm shaking in my boots over your imaginary Sky Santa and his "judgement day". Oooooooohhh.
Drama queen.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#203154 Jul 17, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure they'll provide a lovely home for a child.
You should be wishing them good will instead of being a turd.
But then again why should we expect anything else from you?
She deliriously labors under the mistaken believe that her opinions mean something to me, you or to other gay people! I think in her head her repeatedly not using the word spouse or marriage in context with gays will just make the millions of gays everywhere go, "damn it, some of the fundies won't use the word marriage when they talk about our marriages. I guess we should just stop trying to get their approval and go back to not marrying."!!!!!!! Their imaginary self importance is hysterical!!

It's also so fun to watching her responses become more and more ugly. Speaks volumes!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203155 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
...Their imaginary self importance is hysterical!!
Likewise.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203156 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
She deliriously labors...
Pah-leeze.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#203157 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
They deliberately deprived children of a mother.
Oooooh, all seeing fundie eye!!!

Believe me, the deprivation was very short lived. About a minute or two really. Once they realized the pay off was being endowed with two awesome fathers. Something that fundies like yourself deny your children. Why do you hate your children so?
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
But what does that matter to you, you damned the children.
Where exactly did Veryvermilion damn children? Whose children? Please provide the post number.

Thanks so much Kuntmare. Smile.
Just ME

Pleasanton, CA

#203158 Jul 17, 2013
You guys are a bunch of sickos wanting to dip your D!ck in a pile of Sh!t. Youre all disgusting. I dont even want to imagine what the room smells like after youre done, prob like someone just took a dump.
Just ME

Pleasanton, CA

#203159 Jul 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are free to have believe in whichever book you want to in this country
but there are people legally married that donít believe in your little religion too.
and people of different religions that believe in many different gods and many different religious laws.
and people of no religion at all
Your little book has nothing whatsoever to do with marriage and how it is defined under US Law
My "little book" the bible is the real law. Marriage was originated by god and put into existence in the bible. Man has just twisted its definition over time and made it their own.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#203160 Jul 17, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
If only you could quote a legitimate social scientist who defines marriage as you do...
You can't. They do not exist. Your definition is contrived; a lie.
Please stop blatantly lying if you wish to be taken seriously.
I've posted proof many times, however most people understand the scientific basis perfectly.

Please, specifically what is a lie?

Smile.
Topo parkings

Monrovia, CA

#203161 Jul 17, 2013
Just another bad posting by the previous poster's..

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#203162 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oooooh, all seeing fundie eye!!!
Believe me, the deprivation was very short lived. About a minute or two really. Once they realized the pay off was being endowed with two awesome fathers. Something that fundies like yourself deny your children. Why do you hate your children so?
<quoted text>
Where exactly did Veryvermilion damn children? Whose children? Please provide the post number.
Thanks so much Kuntmare. Smile.
I think I said something like, "I don't give a goddamn about the children".

And they have spun it to mean that I'm "damning" children.

They know full well that I'm TIRED of them using children to fight marriage equality. Children aren't on every single person's mind when they get married. I know if I get married, I won't be thinking about children. I'm not going to have any. I won't be adopting any. They're not going to be a part of my future.

That's why I'm sick to death of hearing about "the children". Please! They don't give a damn about the children. They're only interested in stirring up anti-homosexual sentiment.

But they know this.

They're just being disingenuous.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#203163 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I've posted proof many times, however most people understand the scientific basis perfectly.
Please, specifically what is a lie?
Smile.
You have linked to some "Yahoo" contributor; someone who basically wrote a term paper. And she never used your quote.

I don't have to prove that your comment is a lie. You need to prove that it's true. Give us one a single legitimate social scientist who proves your "social science" claim.

Social science (and basic common sense) defines marriage as a legal union that meets the needs of two people.

It doesn't matter whether a couple marries to raise a family and/or for companionship and/or for one of the pair to improve their status (financial/material) and/or for love and/or lust/beauty...

All of these are legitimate reasons for marriage.

The government certainly doesn't become involved in the reasons people marry. It's none of their business. It's none of the church's business. And it's certainly none of your business.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#203165 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I've posted proof many times, however most people understand the scientific basis perfectly.
Please, specifically what is a lie?
Smile.
You posted nothing but crap

Show me the legal marriage contract for other animals, lets start there.

What is the evolutionary scientific based marriage contract.

I will give you a hint, none exists

I know more of anthropology both physical and cultural than you realize, and to date you have posted nothing but crap that does not relate in any way to marriage law.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#203166 Jul 17, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
I think I said something like, "I don't give a goddamn about the children".
And they have spun it to mean that I'm "damning" children.
Of course they did. Intentional deceitfulness and intentional misrepresentation are their stock and trade.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Complaints Against Google+ (Jul '14) 11 hr Joyg1963 101
Review: Bushnell & Assoc - Ronald G Bushnell CPA (Feb '11) Aug 1 fringe 2
News Ruckus Stock Roars On School Wi-Fi, Cable TV Jul 31 wirelesswatch 1
News Former Santa Cruz mayor, husband, sued for sexu... Jul 22 anon 10
Does anyone know Jon Scottie Clarke......a prop... Jun '15 scottie clarke 1
News Talking with ... One of the nation's leading di... Jun '15 newsfail 2
It's a Justice County and don't you forget it. ... Jun '15 Gang Stalking 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palo Alto Mortgages