Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201807 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Cartoons

Monrovia, CA

#203095 Jul 17, 2013
When did they bring back running man cartoons?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#203096 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I haven't played dumb at all. That would be you dear. You're the one presenting non-existent statistics and "facts", not me. Don't get all bent out of shape because I'm able to call you on your intentional deceitfulness.
<quoted text>
No honeypie, only the fundamentalists (who are a very small faction of society) agree with you, and no one really gives a rat's ass what those people think about anything. They are hypocritical liars like yourself.
<quoted text>
No hon, it isn't. That's why no child health experts agree with your completely unfounded and unsupported statement. I'm quite sure that those experts would just think your an angry c*nt like I do.
Smile!
<quoted text>
No dear, actually the "woman" recognized what wonderful parents we would be and went out of her way to volunteer her time before we ever thought of asking. And my husband and I DO have a child, two actually. Not a damn thing you can do about it but continue to be a raving bitch and stomping your feet and pouting.
Smile c*nt!
<quoted text>
Would you like some cheese to go with your whine hon?
<quoted text>
I'm sure you are. But I have no problem looking them in the eye. I also have no problem using posts like yours to demonstrate to them the utter ugliness, hypocrisy and pure lunacy of fundamentalist Christians.
Thank you for being such an ugly c*nt.
I'm guessing on Mother's Day YOU got the honors and not the woman who abandoned her children?
Gustavo

San Pedro, CA

#203099 Jul 17, 2013
sheesh wrote:
<quoted text>
What alibi? That isn't my explanation dum dum. What I wrote were facts. Try learning the difference.
Fact: Trayvon had been to the store (evidence exists to support this).
Fact: He was returning to his father's residence, ergo he wasn't trespassing. That sums up what he was doing.
Fact: Zimmerman was told to not follow Trayvon.
Fact: Zimmerman continued to follow him well beyond the point he was instructed to back off.
Fact: Trayvon had a history of unacceptable behavior. He had two suspensions under his belt. One for possession of stolen jewelry and a "burglary tool" and one for possession of an empty plastic bag with pot residue and a pipe.
Fact: Zimmerman had a violent past. Two resisting arrest events one deemed non-violent and one deemed violent and one domestic violence. All three swept inexplicably under the rug. Also a fact: his father was a judge.
I wouldn't want either of them in my neighborhood.
Simple enough for you?
Speaking of lies, you insisted Trayvon was trespassing. He wasn't as I pointed out earlier. Unless you think being in your parent's neighborhood is trespassing.
I suspect your reply won't rebut any of the above facts, it'll just be more childish garbage. You've got nothing of substance to say.
George Z. was only protecting his residence, that is why he followed Trayvon. This was a private, gated community and Trayvons parents did NOT reside there family and friends made it up. Fact is Trayvon became violent when asked a simple question. Instead of answering in a civil manner he bacame very agitated instead of just answering the question, Trayvon was so agiteated that he got into Georges face and hit him with a left hook, the rest is self defense on Georges part, too bad for Trayvon, this is one caper he failed at it was just a matter of time. This is just the way young black boys handle their business and this is why there is so much violence around. Their motto is: put the blame some where esle. Bottom line is that the jury tried extreamly hare to find something George did wrong, and after 16 hrs of deliberation they couldn't end of story. Oh it is hilarious that Trayvons parents and friends were positive that Trayvon did no wrong as if they were there the entire time , just like yourself you were there right? you sound like you have been in trouble with the cops before you idiot. Go FK yourself.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203100 Jul 17, 2013
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really, now I just get bored reading your antagonistic posts.
Don't read 'em.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203101 Jul 17, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
If you don't feed a troll it dies.
We keep trying it with Big D but he's still alive.
Poof

Cambridge, IL

#203102 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm guessing on Mother's Day YOU got the honors and not the woman who abandoned her children?
Do you get flowers on mothers day?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203103 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you really assert that the basic essence of marriage is a contract?
Yes he did. Nice, eh?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203104 Jul 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
A troll is someone that attacks the messenger letting you know that Same sex marriage is legal, recognized on both the state and federal level.
Too funny!
Poof

Cambridge, IL

#203105 Jul 17, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
<quoted text>
George Z. was only protecting his residence, that is why he followed Trayvon. This was a private, gated community and Trayvons parents did NOT reside there family and friends made it up. Fact is Trayvon became violent when asked a simple question. Instead of answering in a civil manner he bacame very agitated instead of just answering the question, Trayvon was so agiteated that he got into Georges face and hit him with a left hook, the rest is self defense on Georges part, too bad for Trayvon, this is one caper he failed at it was just a matter of time. This is just the way young black boys handle their business and this is why there is so much violence around. Their motto is: put the blame some where esle. Bottom line is that the jury tried extreamly hare to find something George did wrong, and after 16 hrs of deliberation they couldn't end of story. Oh it is hilarious that Trayvons parents and friends were positive that Trayvon did no wrong as if they were there the entire time , just like yourself you were there right? you sound like you have been in trouble with the cops before you idiot. Go FK yourself.
"This is just the way young black boys handle their business and this is why there is so much violence around. "

Are you a member of the KKK in good standing?
Gustavo

San Pedro, CA

#203106 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they both weren't. I easily demonstrated that.
<quoted text>
No pretending was necessary. I was gay through the entire process of having children.
And I stopped pretending to be hetero around the age of 16 when I realized that ugly people like you have big mouths, but don't at all represent the normal people of society. You're a coward and a c*nt and completely insignificant.
Smile.
You are defective. You can sue your parents for FKing up your life!
Poof

Cambridge, IL

#203107 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I defined nothing.
Social science defines the essence of marriage as a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
That is why you shifted from claiming the essence if marriage was a contract, to the fallacious accusation that I was trying to define your marriage.
Marriage is a contract.

http://www.google.com/search...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203108 Jul 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
No marriages are dependent on what other people that feel different think of yours
Except for child marriages, polygamy, incest marriage, etc. In other words marriage most certainly is dependent on what other people that feel different think of yours.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203109 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they both weren't. I easily demonstrated that.
<quoted text>
No pretending was necessary. I was gay through the entire process of having children.
And I stopped pretending to be hetero around the age of 16 when I realized that ugly people like you have big mouths, but don't at all represent the normal people of society. You're a coward and a c*nt and completely insignificant.
Smile.
Aw c'mon. Tell us how you and your husband have a biological child together.

“what are you talking about you”

Since: Mar 11

schlappington, by god

#203110 Jul 17, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Polygamy is scorned by bigots like Jizzy who were outraged at the same scorn when it was against same sex marriage. Classic hypocrites.
Don't like poly marriage? Don't marry more than one person! Easy!
Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage.
*nod*
if ol coot wantz two mary cooter cuzin, themz haytfilled bigguts shudnt stawp cooter bob frum makun sweet sexified relayshuns with kin!!!
http://s1188.photobucket.com/user/cooterink/m...
frig my lifes!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203111 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>\
You're a desperate fool and an ugly c*nt.
Great argument you have there fruitloops!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203112 Jul 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I work with a very nice lady in a same sex marriage with twins, biologically hers as well.
She has commented to me that her wife also wants to, but right now they have their hands full with the twins.:)
Nice people
Who cares?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203115 Jul 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not going to define my own marriage by your personal definitions ( what a nightmare ),
Likewise.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203116 Jul 17, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>Do you get flowers on mothers day?
How about yourself Jizzy?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#203117 Jul 17, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Except for child marriages, polygamy, incest marriage, etc. In other words marriage most certainly is dependent on what other people that feel different think of yours.
They are not marriages, and why? Because they are not recognized on the state or federal level, thank you for making my point.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#203118 Jul 17, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>"This is just the way young black boys handle their business and this is why there is so much violence around. "
Are you a member of the KKK in good standing?
Oh stop bragging Jizzy, you're not the only member in good standing.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
anyone into kinky taboo fantasy? 10 hr Vickietv slut 1
News Apple's Ahrendts emerges as top-paid U.S. woman... Tue Max 1
News Surenos gang member gets new trial date (Aug '08) Mon microadsl 284
Crystal Rows research reviews Mon microadsl 2
http://www.daleelmanzel.com Mon microadsl 1
Mountain View Music Thread May 3 Musikologist 1
knickers May 2 SarahSarahsarah 3
More from around the web

Palo Alto People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]