Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198912 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text>
That is exactly his problem. His opinion has been over-ruled by the Supreme Court and he continues to cling desperately to his opinions, trying to fabricate some "fact". And, being the fool he is, he doesn't even realize that not all gay people even engage in anal sex! So he has failed once again to make a valid point.
I haven't given an opinion, I'm only mocking.

SCOTUS ruled that ss couples are equal to marriage.

Reality is not listening. Ss couples are still ever only a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.

Maybe SCOTUS needs a unanimous decision??? Think that will work???

Smirk.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198913 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Then stop saying that we are stopping you. Dang son, you are not to bright.
Dang son why do you continually attack me then?

It's because you are a hypocrite. So you get mad at me. Don't shoot the messenger, it's on you, not me. You against marriage equality, I am for it. Duh.

Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage. If you disagree, tell me why, don't just stupidly attack me with your moronic ad hominem.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#198914 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't want to change the law although I think it should be changed. I have my own battles to fight just to continue to stay alive and happy.
I simply want to discuss marriage equality without your fear, ridicule and attempts at censorship. This is a discussion forum. Stop trying to censor me.
So you don't really care if polygamy is illegal or not. Thanks for clearing that up.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#198915 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I haven't given an opinion, I'm only mocking.
SCOTUS ruled that ss couples are equal to marriage.
Reality is not listening. Ss couples are still ever only a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Maybe SCOTUS needs a unanimous decision??? Think that will work???
Smirk.
So if a man and woman are both sterile, its only half a marriage.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#198916 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dang son why do you continually attack me then?
It's because you are a hypocrite. So you get mad at me. Don't shoot the messenger, it's on you, not me. You against marriage equality, I am for it. Duh.
Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage. If you disagree, tell me why, don't just stupidly attack me with your moronic ad hominem.
Then you and all who wish to join in a poly marriage, need to file suit, hire a lawyer and get the laws changed. THE LGBT people did so. Are you that much better than them????

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198917 Jun 29, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's try a more important question. What difference will the answer to your question make?
Here, let me help you out. NONE.
Have a nice day!!
Perfect example of your responses.

When denying the truth doesn't work, then the truth doesn't matter.

Like the SCOTUS ruling, your opinion is having the same effect on reality.

You have a partnership, you do not have a marriage. Even you admitted two key differences out of many.

Oh, parents produce children. Ss couples mutually don't. Ever.

And if children have a choice between the two, they choose parents.

Smile.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#198918 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Then you and all who wish to join in a poly marriage, need to file suit, hire a lawyer and get the laws changed. THE LGBT people did so. Are you that much better than them????
Of course, Frank wouldn't prevail, because they seem to suffer from the delusion that a union of three or more people seeks equal, not greater, protection of the law.

Frank is seriously at odds with reality.
Bob Finch

Sacramento, CA

#198919 Jun 29, 2013
Ya I get it, I know criminals never purchise there guns at gun shops but I still dont care. It just makes me feel better at nite knowing that some people cant buy guns...I just dont like them, they scare me If u wanna protect your family learn how to throw knifes or something I dunno but guns are scary. Maybe if the criminals know almost every law abiding citizen is unarmed theyll stop buying guns on the black market I dunno...just leeve me alone I dont know how to use a gun so what difference would it make if I had one?? Id be too scared to touch it. If someone breaks into your house with a whole crapload of ak's and and ar's just call 911 and go hide in the closet and wait patiently until the proper authorities get there. If they kill you and your whole family hopefully theyll catch the murderes and try them in a court of law according to the law. There...justice for the murdereres theyll go to prison for a few years and well have a real nice funeral for u and your whole family. So there...
laughing man

Luton, UK

#198920 Jun 29, 2013
Butthurt Dweller wrote:
<quoted text>
Frank is seriously at odds with reality.
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/...
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#198921 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Perfect example of your responses.
When denying the truth doesn't work, then the truth doesn't matter.
Like the SCOTUS ruling, your opinion is having the same effect on reality.
You have a partnership, you do not have a marriage. Even you admitted two key differences out of many.
Oh, parents produce children. Ss couples mutually don't. Ever.
And if children have a choice between the two, they choose parents.
Smile.
When did having children become a requirement in marriage? Hell two idiots can reproduce, you're living proof of that.
Surran wrap

Covina, CA

#198922 Jun 29, 2013
More of the same but less spice next time.
Grant

Buena Park, CA

#198923 Jun 29, 2013
ZORO..........WELL SAID, THE FACT IS IT IS WHAT IT IS.....IT IS EQUAL RIGHTS, I FOR ONE AM GLAD WE FINALLY GOT TO THIS POINT, IF SOMEONE DOES NOT LIKE IT DEAL WITH IT OR BYE......BYE

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198924 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote: Perfect example of your responses. When denying the truth doesn't work, then the truth doesn't matter. Like the SCOTUS ruling, your opinion is having the same effect on reality. You have a partnership, you do not have a marriage. Even you admitted two key differences out of many. Oh, parents produce children. Ss couples mutually don't. Ever. And if children have a choice between the two, they choose parents. Smile.
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>When did having children become a requirement in marriage? Hell two idiots can reproduce, you're living proof of that.
Where did I say they were a requirement? Why would they need to be required when they are a natural result of mating behavior and the marriage union?

Clearly the idiot is you.

Smirk.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198925 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>So you don't really care if polygamy is illegal or not. Thanks for clearing that up.
No. That is incorrect.

I think polygamy should be allowed. And you don't. I am in favor of marriage equality and you are not. That is how it is. Why do you attempt to spin it otherwise?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198926 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Then you and all who wish to join in a poly marriage, need to file suit, hire a lawyer and get the laws changed. THE LGBT people did so. Are you that much better than them????
I don't want to enter a poly marriage and I don't want to do that other stuff you ridiculously order me to do.

I simply want to discuss marriage equality without your fear, ridicule and attempts at censorship.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198927 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote: I haven't given an opinion, I'm only mocking. SCOTUS ruled that ss couples are equal to marriage. Reality is not listening. Ss couples are still ever only a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. Maybe SCOTUS needs a unanimous decision??? Think that will work??? Smirk.
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>So if a man and woman are both sterile, its only half a marriage.
Hardly.

This isn't rocket science, are you really that stupid?

Sterility in opposite sex couples indicates a injury or birth defect.

Mutually sterility in ss couples is a design conflict. Simply impossible.

However, the bottom line is still this;

Reality is disobeying SCOTUS!!! What is Obama going to do now??? Someone needs to file suit.

VV, where are you?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198928 Jun 29, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, Frank wouldn't prevail, because they seem to suffer from the delusion that a union of three or more people seeks equal, not greater, protection of the law.
Frank is seriously at odds with reality.
By your idiotic logic equal rights for Asians seeks greater protection than equal rights for Inuits, because Asians out number Inuits.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#198929 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>One must ask, what is marriage?
The legal, cultural, social, historical, sexual, and/or religious union of husband and wife.
A lawful contract between two consenting adults.
If that's all it is, there's no reason to deny ANY two consenting adults.
So how does the names of the two affect the contract, Bill and Sam, Sue and Jill? Husband and Husband wife and wife.
Or the prior relationship or blood ties between the two, to carry your reasoning further.
YouJipped

Covina, CA

#198930 Jun 29, 2013
Egypt has a low boiling point now that another summer festival with guns and bullet are in the air..
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#198931 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I am discussing it. It seems to bother you a lot. Why?
Huh? It doesn't bother me in the leaset. I have never said anything disparaging about poly. There is a difference between discussing and posting the same thing over and over in an attempt to stir up drama. Discuss. Do you have points to make? Please make them. I am listening.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ron Fleishman is the World's Most Underrated Ph... (Sep '15) Dec 2 Ron 151
News Man in car exposes himself to woman in Palo Alto Dec 1 Kevin from Michigan 1
Uber for Drones - "Palo Altitude" startup Nov 30 Palo Altitude 1
News Tesla competitor Lucid Motors picks Arizona for... Nov 30 I Got Your Jewels 5
News Trump deportation plan sends South Bay leaders ... Nov 29 spytheweb 2
Sunnyvale Parrot Study (Dec '09) Nov 27 lol 29
News Sunnyvale considers expanding smoking ban to mu... (Sep '15) Nov 19 Haha 30

Palo Alto Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palo Alto Mortgages