Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 8,593)

Showing posts 171,841 - 171,860 of200,315
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197384
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess dummy.
How many gods are there? 100, 500, 1000, or 10,000 dummy

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197385
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Just trying to relate the pics to your claim of marriage and family.
Hope to God the kids weren't there. I wouldn't submit my wife to that behavior.
<quoted text>
The fact that you would promote depraved behavior like that and slander me only confirms your reprobate condition.
At every level that behavior and your defense of it portrays a twisted existence. I know that not every homosexual revels in it, but you clearly do.
<quoted text>
Your depravity is gay twirl lying about what I said. I said nothing about your dress.
The depravity of the parade is, as I noted from the pictures, the perverted behavior and dress.
As to slander, your denial of such is only another lie. What you consistently fail to do is simply specifically expose any such lies, as have just done with yours.
If you find such events (which are completely legal) to be depraved, then you don't have to attend them. In fact, you don't even have to search for photos of them online.

I don't agree with you. Very often I chastise you. But slander? Nope... Slander means that I would need to sit down and purposefully attempt to do harm to your reputation. I don't care enough about you to give a damn about your reputation.

As far as I'm concerned, you are your own worst enemy. Contrived definitions... Embarrassing knowledge when it comes to anything science-related... Willingness to lie about statistics as long as its suits your agenda... The list could go on.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197386
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

xolo wrote:
<quoted text>
By "depravity" do you mean things like "Girls Gone Wild", the show "Jersey Shore", pretty much any reality TV show (especially anything on MTV), the plethora of heterosexual porn on the internet, etc? Just wondering if all those things are included on the list of things you oppose.
Whether I oppose them or not, they do not represent the honor of marriage or the responsible care of children, do they.

Your argument that one form of immorality excuses other forms is simply idiotic arrogance.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197387
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No a birth defect does not hinder a person's happiness.
Homosexuality is a defective failure of mating behavior. A clear sexual birth defect.
So, priests and nuns who take a vow of celibacy are birth defects?

Just because someone lives a lifestyle in which they will likely not attempt to have children of their own is hardly a birth defect.

That you continue to call us "defective" is just another contrived notion.

Can you show me where any scientist in any field has determined that homosexuality is a "clear sexual birth defect"?

You can't. Because it isn't true. It is an out and out lie.

This is why you will never be taken seriously. No one will defend someone else who consistently lies.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197388
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
If you find such events (which are completely legal) to be depraved, then you don't have to attend them. In fact, you don't even have to search for photos of them online.
I don't agree with you. Very often I chastise you. But slander? Nope... Slander means that I would need to sit down and purposefully attempt to do harm to your reputation. I don't care enough about you to give a damn about your reputation.
As far as I'm concerned, you are your own worst enemy. Contrived definitions... Embarrassing knowledge when it comes to anything science-related... Willingness to lie about statistics as long as its suits your agenda... The list could go on.
I don't attend those kind of events , and there are obviously illegal aspects that are ignored.

I simply exposed your misrepresentation of them. Now, after denying the fact, you embarrassingly acknowledge them.

Your last few posts are clear evidence of your slander. You are so stooped in denial, you don't even recognize it anymore. But trust me, others do.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197390
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
So, priests and nuns who take a vow of celibacy are birth defects?
Just because someone lives a lifestyle in which they will likely not attempt to have children of their own is hardly a birth defect.
That you continue to call us "defective" is just another contrived notion.
Can you show me where any scientist in any field has determined that homosexuality is a "clear sexual birth defect"?
You can't. Because it isn't true. It is an out and out lie.
This is why you will never be taken seriously. No one will defend someone else who consistently lies.
You said a birth defect was determined by the inability to live a happy life. That is a stupid lie.

I exposed it, now you want to shift the issue.

Homosexuality is a defective failure of mating behavior. It is what motivates the scientific search for a cause. One that the epi-marker mistake apparently explains and confirms if verified.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197391
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Whether I oppose them or not, they do not represent the honor of marriage or the responsible care of children, do they.
Your argument that one form of immorality excuses other forms is simply idiotic arrogance.
Do you think that all heterosexuals ( Man and Wife) are the only people capable of raising a child?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197392
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
This from someone who not just excused obscene, perverted behavior in public, but bragged about it!
And then there are Christians who find no conflict between the Bible and God and science and reality.
The integrity of your world is fractured every which way VV. That is what I keep exposing over and over. It is why I annoy you so deeply.
<quoted text>
Any non-reprobate has no problem seeing what is depraved in those pictures.
You deny God, science and reality constantly in your posts, as just these last few witness.
I'm sure everyone on here is clear about your feelings towards me.
Early on in our conversations--back when you used to come on the Greeneville, TN TOPIX forum as "watchman", I reached out to you--to meet with you personally to try to discuss the issue in a respectful, adult manner.

You refused.

Instead you have spent over two years making the most vile comments about homosexuality--mostly homosexual men.

So, I'm sure the others here will forgive me if there is no love lost between me and you.

Your sole goal is to create a society that not only hates homosexuals, but hates them to a point of extinction.

I don't think anyone on here would disagree with that statement.

You're totally transparent.

Your bungled attempts to use scientific terminology and ideology has made for some pretty good chuckles over the years.

And your lack of support in this room should be proof of that.

A person who has a character defect always thinks that it's everyone else's fault for not understanding him/her. They are never willing to look internally and ask the question, "Could I be wrong about this?"

This is you To a T.
xolo

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197393
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Whether I oppose them or not, they do not represent the honor of marriage or the responsible care of children, do they.
Your argument that one form of immorality excuses other forms is simply idiotic arrogance.
I didn't make an argument. I asked a question. You have not answered it. But it seems you agree that immoral behavior exists in both the heterosexual and homosexual communities. Perhaps it would make more sense to focus on that, rather than whether someone is gay or straight. There are good honorable human beings in this world (some are gay, some are straight). There are horrible human beings in this world (some are gay, some are straight).
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197394
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah but guess which one we're talking about? Duh.
You're trying to make some kind of dopey point I'm sure, why don't you just make it instead of trying to get cute?
We're not talking about a bowl of spaghetti that can fly.
I see then we are talking about Thor.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197395
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Another lie.
Your spiritual father would be proud.
<quoted text>
Why would I need to 'go on record', you lied and said I already had.
You were saying something about not wasting time slandering me???
If you ever fall from the level of your ego to the level of your IQ, you will die.
Several of the people who discuss this topic have no problem with homosexuality. They just don't want gays to have the right to marry.

You, on the other hand, have lied and said vile things about gays since the beginning.

You say we're a "sexual defect". You say that we are "broken". Your CLEAR message is that there shouldn't be gays on the planet.

You've refused to come right out and say this because you know how it would make you look. You know that what tiny amount of support some of the others occasionally throw your way would wither up and die.

I've given you the opportunity several times for you to prove me wrong; to show that I have totally misread you.

But you won't do it.

"Answer the question", I've said to you. "Do you think the world would be better if homosexuality didn't exist?"

It's a simple "yes or no" question.

Answer it. Show me and the others in this room how you really feel about gay.
xolo

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197396
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You said a birth defect was determined by the inability to live a happy life. That is a stupid lie.
I exposed it, now you want to shift the issue.
Homosexuality is a defective failure of mating behavior. It is what motivates the scientific search for a cause. One that the epi-marker mistake apparently explains and confirms if verified.
The only thing you have "exposed" is your own stupidity and hateful, un-Christian behavior.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197397
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You said a birth defect was determined by the inability to live a happy life. That is a stupid lie.
I exposed it, now you want to shift the issue.
Homosexuality is a defective failure of mating behavior. It is what motivates the scientific search for a cause. One that the epi-marker mistake apparently explains and confirms if verified.
"It is what motivates the scientific search for a cause. One that the epi-marker mistake apparently explains and confirms if verified."

Link please
Celebrate Diversity

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197398
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Your sole goal is to create a society that not only hates homosexuals, but hates them to a point of extinction.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
xolo

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197399
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Whether I oppose them or not, they do not represent the honor of marriage or the responsible care of children, do they.
Your argument that one form of immorality excuses other forms is simply idiotic arrogance.
Which one of us is arrogant? Look in the mirror and you will find the answer.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197400
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You said a birth defect was determined by the inability to live a happy life. That is a stupid lie.
I exposed it, now you want to shift the issue.
Homosexuality is a defective failure of mating behavior. It is what motivates the scientific search for a cause. One that the epi-marker mistake apparently explains and confirms if verified.
No... You lie, yet again.

What motivates science to search for a cause is curiosity. Scientists have searched for the answer to many characteristic differences in mankind. "Why do some people prefer blond hair?" "Why are some people fascinated by competitive sports?" "Why do people risk their lives and jump out of airplanes?" "Why are some people democrats, while others are republicans?"

These questions do not imply any pathology of the focus of their studies.

You lie when you talk about the epi-marker THEORY. It has not been verified, so it cannot explain it. And even if it does explain why there are homosexuals, it does not indicate that homosexuality is a defect. If anything it would indicate that homosexuality is a natural occurrence--one that is finally understood.

Scientists aren't really into determining morality. If you knew anything about science, you'd know that.
xolo

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197401
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Several of the people who discuss this topic have no problem with homosexuality. They just don't want gays to have the right to marry.
You, on the other hand, have lied and said vile things about gays since the beginning.
You say we're a "sexual defect". You say that we are "broken". Your CLEAR message is that there shouldn't be gays on the planet.
You've refused to come right out and say this because you know how it would make you look. You know that what tiny amount of support some of the others occasionally throw your way would wither up and die.
I've given you the opportunity several times for you to prove me wrong; to show that I have totally misread you.
But you won't do it.
"Answer the question", I've said to you. "Do you think the world would be better if homosexuality didn't exist?"
It's a simple "yes or no" question.
Answer it. Show me and the others in this room how you really feel about gay.
Now THAT is the true question. KiMare, please answer the question. And if the answer is "yes" please post your recommended strategy on how the world should move forward in dealing with this issue.
xolo

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197402
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Celebrate Diversity wrote:
<quoted text>
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
There is definitely something wrong with you.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197403
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't attend those kind of events , and there are obviously illegal aspects that are ignored.
I simply exposed your misrepresentation of them. Now, after denying the fact, you embarrassingly acknowledge them.
Your last few posts are clear evidence of your slander. You are so stooped in denial, you don't even recognize it anymore. But trust me, others do.
You do understand that just because I say something about you that you don't happen to like, does not mean that I have slandered you, don't you?

I'm already trying to school you in science. Do I also have to school you in law?

I would WELCOME any attempt by you to prove in a court of law that anything I have said about you rises to the level of slander.

Go out, hire an attorney, have him or her request those records of me slandering you from TOPIX, and file an action against me.

I live in Knoxville. I'll even give you my address willingly so that we can go to court.

I say things about you that you do not like to hear. I say things that you do not agree with. This do not mean that I have slandered you.

With slander you have to prove that it was my intention to harm you in a way that you suffered some kind of verifiable loss.

An example would be if you owned a restaurant and I went to your website and made the comment "The owner of this restaurant uses horse meat to make hamburgers." That would be slander.

If you were my boss and you fired me, then I made a false claim that you sexually harassed me--causing you to lose your job and strain your marriage, that would be slander.

Show me where I have slandered you...
laughing man

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197404
Jun 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

xolo wrote:
<quoted text>
There is definitely something wrong with you.
Bigot!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 171,841 - 171,860 of200,315
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

6 Users are viewing the Palo Alto Forum right now

Search the Palo Alto Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 9 hr Sparky A2 7,833
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 9 hr Ronald 2,251
Report: Retaliation by supervisors common at VA 21 hr Viet Nam Vet 1
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Mon Racjei 4,885
San Lorenzo man pleads not guilty to beating (Apr '09) Jul 18 annonymous 46
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Jul 11 This topics peaked 15,911
Review: Vencoa Inc (Jul '12) Jul 5 jainy2 54
•••
•••

Palo Alto News Video

•••
•••

Palo Alto Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Palo Alto People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palo Alto News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palo Alto
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••