That'd be Old SniffButts Billy. aka $3 Bill. He's not "to" smart.<quoted text>Actually, you are not bright at all. Based on your argument, then the CSSC never should have granted SSM in California because the issue had been previously addressed in 2002. In fact, the CSSC was aware of the Prop 8 initiative when it granted a temporary right for gays to marry between June 2008 and Nov. 2008. So, the CSSC was always a temporary ruling, which was set to be decided on Nov. 4, 2008.
Before you step up to this plate, you need to stop feeding from pig trough's, because I only serve gourmet facts.
Even your name smells of your ignorance. It should be "Not too Bright Are You". It must suck when your ignorance is on display before you even post a comment.