Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196169 Jun 15, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Whack Job Bible totin Fundies are the base of your assbackwards party. Give it up moron, its 2013.
Spoken like a person of tolerance and diversity.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196170 Jun 15, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
None of them are, actually. Every last one of them are sloganeers, script readers, drones, losers, dying to get out there and destroy Society.
Jerky knees too. Quick knee jerk reaction to any post.

This "Zoro" clown is a true dummy.

"Zoro" is his sock puppet of the day, he gets embarrassed then comes back with another. If you call him on it he lies.

He's a real sillyass piece of work from Cheese-head country.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#196171 Jun 15, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Fundamentalist polygamists have a substantial first amendment right to marry multiple wives according to the dictates of their faith.
Atheist polygamists have a right to marry just like atheist homosexuals do. Glad you don't like it hypocrite, but it won't hurt you or your silly passionless straight marriage.
do fundamentalist polygamists have a substantial first amendment right to marry multiple husbands according to the dictates of their faith?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196174 Jun 15, 2013
I bet Jizzy meant to name his new sock "Zorro" but misspelled it.

What a dope! I like him! That's why I frequent the gay threads.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196175 Jun 15, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
do fundamentalist polygamists have a substantial first amendment right to marry multiple husbands according to the dictates of their faith?
Yes. Even same sex atheists! Like three hot young twinks as long as they're consenting adults! Hubba Hubba! Bet you like equality for them even if you don't like it for people you hate.

But keep your lurid sexual fantasies out of this. We're trying to talk marriage equality.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196184 Jun 15, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>No dippy. WE DO NOT base our laws on religious doctrine.
I'm asking to bse laws on their religion. I'm asking to allow them the free exercise of their religion like the 1st amendment says.

I'm also asking to give power rangers, spice boys and clam divers the right to marry the partner(s) of their choice. It's the 21st century Jizzy! Damn boy! Oh snap! Cool beans.

And no, before you get a brilliant inspiration, no one wants to marry a goat or a tree. Nor should they be able to. Animals and trees cannot enter into contracts, it's absurd.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196185 Jun 15, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
There was a time when religious folk shouted "sinner" and "heathen" and "Repent!"
Now it's "homophobe" and "bigot" and "racist" (?!?) and all kinds of things to make you "see the light" and come out of the "darkness" or "dark ages".
Their bible is a script. "homophobe" is an invented word aimed at tweens who mimic anything and everything in order to "fit in".
How am I doing so far, Fundie Polyp-wrangler?
*snicker*
Zoro's religion (atheism) requires as much or more faith as any other religion. And Zoro is one of it most fundie adherents.

The jackass thinks he's real cute and worships the flying bowl of spaghetti. ha ha.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196186 Jun 15, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm asking to bse laws on their religion. I'm asking to allow them the free exercise of their religion like the 1st amendment says.
I'm also asking to give power rangers, spice boys and clam divers the right to marry the partner(s) of their choice. It's the 21st century Jizzy! Damn boy! Oh snap! Cool beans.
And no, before you get a brilliant inspiration, no one wants to marry a goat or a tree. Nor should they be able to. Animals and trees cannot enter into contracts, it's absurd.
*First sentence should read: I'm NOT asking to base laws on their religion.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196189 Jun 15, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>So what religious sect shall we base marriage laws on????? If we allow polygamy because a Jack version of the Mormon church want's it, but that law offends the FSM church who do then side with? No idiot we don't change our laws based on the whims of a handfull of religious zealots. We governed by a Theocracy.
Get religion out of your head fundie. We should allow polygamy because we allow marriage equality. And it won't hurt your fundie ass. Always with your religion shtick.

It's not an ala carte menu dummy. Equality means everyone. Even people you hate. Why should we give 2 men the right to marry but not 3 men?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196192 Jun 15, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose you meant "Republicans" with your oh-so witty pre-tween repartee? Did you get that in your GLAAD package along with "homophobe" and "bigot"?
I have no use whatsoever for the spineless GOP either, who have looked the other way while you Caligulas have received Special Status.
I'm still laughing at you, zit grrrl.
He's just about trotted out his whole dopey repertoire. Now he'll get humiliated, slink away and come back with another sock puppet but the same old schtick. Then when you call him on it he'll lie. I got Jizzy's number.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196193 Jun 15, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>I see you got your stupid going today. Atheism is not a religion. Go back to brooooklim ya moron.
Your brand of fundie hateful atheism is a religion.

We, as rational individuals, all know its true except the atheists themselves. When, and only when, you understand that you indeed belong to a religion, then we can get down as to who holds the most accurate and truthful religion out there. For Atheists to attempt to claim "neutrality", in reference to God, is a complete cop out and disingenuous intellectually.

You have indeed picked a side. You choose your religion based on what you believe is evidentiary to your presuppositions. Denying what you believe, and hold as truth, may be an easier pill for you to swallow but you are only attempting to deceive yourself.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196197 Jun 15, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>So you wish to over ride a law based on religion. Hummm nope idiot wont happen.
Religious Law and Its Application in U.S. Courts
Various religions have developed their own set of precepts to guide the actions and behaviors of
their particular religious community and followers. For the purposes of this report, these precepts
are generally referred to as religious law—that is, the rules of a particular religious community, as
opposed to secular law, which would be laws adopted by the government of a particular state or
nation. Sharia—often translated as Islamic law, which encompasses rules, norms, processes, and
practices to be followed by Muslims, has been of particular interest recently.4 However, it is not
the only religious legal structure that might intersect with issues before U.S. courts. For example,
in Judaism, the Halakhah and Haggadah comprise the norms by which individuals of the Jewish
faith are governed.5 Similarly, canon law is a body of law that applies to certain sects ofChristianity.6 These bodies of religious law may play as relevant a role in certain legal actions as
sharia might play in others.
In the United States, these religious laws have no legally binding effect on U.S. citizens because
religious laws cannot be adopted by federal, state, or local governments under the First
Amendment. Rather, individuals who identify with a particular religious group may voluntarily
subject themselves to such religious laws by their association with the community.7
You're such a fundie, always with your religion schtick. As you often insist, religion is totally irrelevant to marriage. Try again.

Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage. Tell me why you believe it doesn't. Hold the fundie atheism, your religion is irrelevant.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196199 Jun 15, 2013
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.

If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196201 Jun 15, 2013
I bet JazyBird58 changes sock puppets again soon. Wonder what dopey new name he'll come up with this time.

Old SniffsButt Billy calls him "Bird man" like he's cool or something. This stuff cracks me up.
LockUps

Covina, CA

#196202 Jun 15, 2013
I this the STUPID LOCKER?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196205 Jun 15, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Tell me Frank why are you two faced? Why didn't you respond to this post?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...
Why should I?

But as long as it's question and answer time bird man, I answered yours now it's you turn to answer mine! Why didn't you finish high school at least? Do you have a sad story or was it just sloth?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196206 Jun 15, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>
United States of America[edit]The United States was an association of former British Colonies which incorporated much of English law and culture in its Federal Constitution. Atheism in the USA is protected under the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause. In August 2005, in a case where a prison inmate was blocked by prison officials from creating an inmate group to study and discuss atheism, the court ruled this violated the inmate's rights under the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed previous Supreme Court precedent by ruling atheism be afforded equal protection with religions under the 1st amendment.[11][12]
Atheism is protected under the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed previous Supreme Court precedent by ruling atheism be afforded equal protection with religions under the 1st amendment
But it is not called a RELIGION.
Relax fruitloops.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196207 Jun 15, 2013
LockUps wrote:
I this the STUPID LOCKER?
Zoro is dumbing it down more than usual.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196211 Jun 15, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>For example,
in Judaism, the Halakhah and Haggadah comprise the norms by which individuals of the Jewish
faith are governed.5 Similarly, canon law is a body of law that applies to certain sects ofChristianity.6 These bodies of religious law may play as relevant a role in certain legal actions as
sharia might play in others.
In the United States, these religious laws have no legally binding effect on U.S. citizens because
religious laws cannot be adopted by federal, state, or local governments under the First
Amendment. Rather, individuals who identify with a particular religious group may voluntarily
subject themselves to such religious laws by their association with the community
Jeez Jiz, cut and paste is bad enough but at least learn how to do it.

Boring stuff. Why did you post it? Will you ever stop with your religion schtick? Take it to the fundie threads.

Besides your religion, what other objections do you have to marriage equality?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196212 Jun 15, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>POUND SAND
YUK!YUK!YUK! You mad spicecake?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gay/bi skype (Jun '16) 1 hr mel 235
News Man pleads not guilty in East Palo Alto cockfig... 9 hr un agenda 21 6
Ron Fleishman is the World's Most Underrated Ph... (Sep '15) 16 hr Jenny 240
HELP! Stop Unjust Persecutions of TAXPAYERS ove... Fri un agenda 21 7
Complaints Against Google+ (Jul '14) Apr 25 Ditto 117
News Mysterious door rattling reported in county; ea... (Mar '09) Apr 18 liza 108
Sunnyvale park on December 4th Apr 15 Fake n Real 5

Palo Alto Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palo Alto Mortgages