Of course procreation has never been a requirement, it wasnt necessary.<quoted text>
That we accept disabled vets that cannot have children to marry is not a loophole, that we accept people that have had surgeries that make having children an impossibility is not a loophole. That we allow elderly couples to marry that cannot have children is not a loophole
The fact is, procreation is not now nor has ever been a requirement for a marriage license.
You are hanging onto something that doesnít even exist as an argument, It is completely worthless.
It has already been trashed in court multiple times, it is not a valid argument, you need to try and find a different tack because no one of any intelligence is going to buy that one.
If that is all you have in your arguments against same sex marrage, it is no wonder you are losing so badly and so quickly
But the fact remains that marriage has been the best setting for procreation IN EVERY culture.
Ss couples can never equate to that.
To call ss couples married is no different than calling a tail on a dog a leg.
I sympathize with the desperate attempt of homosexuals to be normal, but this denial simply makes you look foolish.