Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,820

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
LaidOut

Covina, CA

#192937 May 23, 2013
May 22, 2013 - a news helicopter has been hovering for about an hour over the big dig area. The house in question is located at the end of a cul-de-sac, three owners have occupied this house since Robert Byron sold it and moved to Covina, Ca. we have tracked down the first owner to buy this house and are currently investigating.

Glendora, California 1978 a 24 year old lady went missing, now the LA County Sheriffs Department is on the job and digging up a back yard in the city of Glendora, California 91740.

The person who reported her missing was her husband, the house has been sold three times since then.

Glad to see some real police department work is being carried out by the sheriffs department on Essex Street at 555.

The neighborhood kids like the husband, but no wife? Wonder what happened to her remains?
More insider information to follow;

According to sources the back yard of this house in questions was not landscaped and only consisted of tall weeds and hard pack bare soil, dead pets were buried in the backyard before someone landscaped the entire backyard.

Glad to see the GPD is doing crowd and traffic control.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#192938 May 23, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Since all you have are slogans, you won't mind if I do nothing more than mock you for the rest of your miserable existence?
Thank you.
I am not the sheep spewing the same crap for the last couple thousand years.

I am in the majority of Americans that actually believe in the values of this country.

Your laughing at me is a complement, I would be embarrassed if you werenít, people might think I was also an ignorant moron.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#192939 May 23, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not the sheep spewing the same crap for the last couple thousand years.
I am in the majority of Americans that actually believe in the values of this country.
Your laughing at me is a complement, I would be embarrassed if you werenít, people might think I was also an ignorant moron.
There's really no need to have anyone laugh at you to be the ignorant moron that you are. You would be an ignorant moron even without the laughs.
LaidOut

Covina, CA

#192940 May 23, 2013
News update May 23, 2013 - Corner moves it's team in.

May 22, 2013 - a news helicopter has been hovering for about an hour over the big dig area. The house in question is located at the end of a cul-de-sac, three owners have occupied this house since Robert Byron sold it and moved to Covina, Ca. we have tracked down the first owner to buy this house and are currently investigating.

Glendora, California 1978 a 24 year old lady went missing, now the LA County Sheriffs Department is on the job and digging up a back yard in the city of Glendora, California 91740.

The person who reported her missing was her husband, the house has been sold three times since then.

Glad to see some real police department work is being carried out by the sheriffs department on 555 Essex Street.

The neighborhood kids like the husband, but no wife? Wonder what happened to her remains?
More insider information to follow.

According to sources the back yard of this house in questions was not landscaped and only consisted of tall weeds and hard pack bare soil, dead pets were buried in the backyard before someone landscaped the entire backyard.

Glad to see the GPD is doing crowd and traffic control.

Stand back, the Corner has brought out the dogs and shovels to start unearthing something buried in this houses backyard.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#192941 May 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Same-sex marriages that are built on love, mutual respect, monogamy, and life-long commitment are equal to any opposite-sex marriage.
Close, but no cigar.
As you have said many times before, the potential for children in a relationship IS NOT a basis for marriage.
Why you continue your "What about the children?" campaign continues to baffle me.
Your TIRED "mutually sterile duplicate", "cross-cultural constraint", and "failure of mating behavior" material has gotten really old. Nobody believes it.
It's the reason marriage, as a distinct privileged relationship, exists in the first place. Otherwise why would it matter who married who, or didn't marry who?
Why should we deny same-sex couples access to legal marriage based on your opinions?
Now, I've answered your question. You answer mine...
Individuals can access legal marriage as part of a pairing recognized by law, not couples. Why should marriage be fundamentally redefined?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#192942 May 23, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not the sheep spewing the same crap for the last couple thousand years.
I am in the majority of Americans that actually believe in the values of this country.
Your laughing at me is a complement, I would be embarrassed if you werenít, people might think I was also an ignorant moron.
But not the value of Americans expressing their will through the voting process, as in votes for prop 22, and prop 8. Apparently that value is not part of Big D's patriotism.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#192943 May 23, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Close, but no cigar.
<quoted text>
It's the reason marriage, as a distinct privileged relationship, exists in the first place. Otherwise why would it matter who married who, or didn't marry who?
<quoted text>
Individuals can access legal marriage as part of a pairing recognized by law, not couples. Why should marriage be fundamentally redefined?
It isnít being fundamentally re-defined, we are just making it more inclusive.

The thousands upon thousands of same sex couples legally married in the US today certainly did not re-define my marriage in any way at all.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#192944 May 23, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
But not the value of Americans expressing their will through the voting process, as in votes for prop 22, and prop 8. Apparently that value is not part of Big D's patriotism.
I have also noticed that Big D's patriotism tends to be very authoritarian and very selective.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#192945 May 23, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It isnít being fundamentally re-defined, we are just making it more inclusive.
The thousands upon thousands of same sex couples legally married in the US today certainly did not re-define my marriage in any way at all.
If you make it too inclusive it will include everyone and then everyone will be married and marriage will mean absolutely nothing.
Brew Cee

Tempe, AZ

#192946 May 23, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am in the majority of Americans that actually believe in the values of this country.
My sphincter has value!!!!
Brew Cee Hypocreete

Tempe, AZ

#192947 May 23, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It isnít being fundamentally re-defined, we are just making it more inclusive.
Our inclusive club allows sphincters!!!!

White right wing Christian heterosexuals who care for Life need not apply!!!!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#192948 May 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
If you make it too inclusive it will include everyone and then everyone will be married and marriage will mean absolutely nothing.
Your marriage perhaps

They did not harm mine in any way at all, I think it is odd that someones marriage is so terribly affected by others being able to marry.

In court the lawyers could not find a single couple whose marriage was harmed by others being able to marry, it was a critical flaw in their case. Not one single example was able to be given.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#192950 May 23, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Does it really take a bought and paid for "scientist" to see what a child can see?
Children see a lot of things... Children see cooked spinach and think you're trying to poison them. They see Harry Potter and believe in magic. Children can look up at the sky and think Heaven is just beyond the clouds--that their deceased grandparents are walking around on smoke, looking lovingly down on them from above.

That's why children aren't scientists.

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

#192952 May 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What a slut! She pulled a train "several times each" with two guys who were probably disgusted. Nice!
Didn't they ever hear of a turkey baster? Geez.
Well, you have never heard of minding your own business.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#192953 May 23, 2013
You said: Close, but no cigar.

--Other than gender, there is no difference between two same-sex people and opposite-sex people who decide to marry based on love, monogamy mutual respect, and lifelong commitment.

You said: It's the reason marriage, as a distinct privileged relationship, exists in the first place. Otherwise why would it matter who married who, or didn't marry who?

--You say that marriage is a "distinct privileged relationship" because of the potential for children. Yet hundreds of thousands (millions?) of opposite-sex couples either do not marry even though they create a child or they break apart their marriage even though they have children together.
As I've said before, if you want to tie children so closely to marriage, then you need to radically redefine marriage as being only available to those couples who wish to have children.
Sterile couples, older couples, and couples who do not wish to have children for whatever reason SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED to marry for any reason.
You realize the ridiculousness of this, yet you continue to yammer on about how closely bound children are to marriage.
Marriage is a legal contract between two people--not between two people and their children.
If children were a part of the legal contract between their parents, then if their parents divorce, then they too would be divorced from one or both parents.

You said: Individuals can access legal marriage as part of a pairing recognized by law, not couples. Why should marriage be fundamentally redefined?

--Marriage would not be fundamentally redefined. Marriage at its most basic level is a legal contract between two unrelated, consenting, adult people--two human beings. That is why 15 countries and 12 states and the District of Columbia have taken gender away from their marriage certificates.

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

#192954 May 23, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Since all you have are slogans, you won't mind if I do nothing more than mock you for the rest of your miserable existence?
Thank you.
Since mocking people is all you have you must sit home every Friday night, alone, by yourself.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#192955 May 23, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It isnít being fundamentally re-defined, we are just making it more inclusive.
By claiming the husband or the wife is expendable? There's only two sexes. Marriage is already inclusive, both sexes are included.
The thousands upon thousands of same sex couples legally married in the US today certainly did not re-define my marriage in any way at all.
Well as long as Big D's marriage is not "re-define"d it must be okay. Let's not stop there. Bring 'em all in.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#192956 May 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
If you make it too inclusive it will include everyone and then everyone will be married and marriage will mean absolutely nothing.
You guys want to keep marriage an exclusive action; a club for opposite gender people only.

That is the very definition of discrimination based on sexual orientation.

If you and others are so afraid of your particular marriages losing their "meaning", all because some same-sex partners being allowed to marry, then you didn't have much of a marriage to begin with.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#192957 May 23, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
By claiming the husband or the wife is expendable? There's only two sexes. Marriage is already inclusive, both sexes are included.
<quoted text>
Well as long as Big D's marriage is not "re-define"d it must be okay. Let's not stop there. Bring 'em all in.
Yeah, Pietro... I think you're finally seeing the light.

Will your own marriage be impacted by gays getting married? Please make us a list of all the ways it will change.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#192958 May 23, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
By claiming the husband or the wife is expendable? There's only two sexes. Marriage is already inclusive, both sexes are included.
<quoted text>
Well as long as Big D's marriage is not "re-define"d it must be okay. Let's not stop there. Bring 'em all in.
No I am not expendable in my marriage, my wife is not expendable in our marriage, as a non-religious person I may be unfamiliar with your terms of people as ďexpendableĒ in a marrage.

What I am saying is I am married, and my wife and I have not had to redefine our marriage in any way at all because same sex couples could marry, furthermore the court cases have been lost twice now by the supporters of Prop 8 and one of the many reasons for the loss is because they could not find a single married couple whose marriage was harmed by same sex couples being able to marry

Not one

Why donít you tell us.... in what way was your marriage harmed by same sex couples being able to marry?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What you have to say about the Rolling Stones i... Mon Dave 1
News Soledad Canyon a " California Mar 25 Ravenite Coffee 2
Need a place to stay asap! Mar 25 Will 1
does anyone need a good dog walker (May '07) Mar 25 chicagodawg 46
News Suddenly, water is everywhere in solar system Mar 24 Beingreal999 2
Rogue Topix Moderators Mar 23 WTSenior 7
News Talking with ... One of the nation's leading di... Mar 23 Controversy 1
Palo Alto Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Palo Alto People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]