Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Big D

Modesto, CA

#191843 May 11, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Huge difference between skin color, and equating a sterile redumbant gendered couple with marriage.
It is clear your bigotry brought religion in, I was speaking about simple common sense.
Future generations will laugh at another brief excursion into denial. Children deprived of nature's provision of a mother and father will not laugh.
Like they laughed at freeing slaves
Like they laughed at getting rid of the Jim Crow laws
like they laughed at women getting the vote

Yes... they will be laughing at you
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#191846 May 11, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Like they laughed at freeing slaves
Like they laughed at getting rid of the Jim Crow laws
like they laughed at women getting the vote
Yes... they will be laughing at you
YUK!YUK!YUK!
HAR!HAR!HAR!
@ Big D!

Try to relax.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#191848 May 11, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Gall? It grieves me for the sake of a child deprived of a parent to satisfy the vain attempt by a ss couple to imitate a real family.
How can I be against ss 'marriage'? There is no such thing to be against!
How can it be called a 'natural continuum' when the cause and purpose has not been determined?
The Tea Party stands for small government. Benghazi and the IRS despotism is exactly why that is the basis of our Constitution. Something you admit having no problem abusing.
Smirk.
It grieves a lot of us to see a child raised in an environment of ignorance, bigotry and hatred. Should we keep your kind from having or adpoting children?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#191850 May 11, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It grieves a lot of us to see a child raised in an environment of ignorance, bigotry and hatred. Should we keep your kind from having or adpoting children?
Nice! King Big D decides who cannot have or "adpot" children for political reasons.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#191851 May 11, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It grieves a lot of us to see a child raised in an environment of ignorance, bigotry and hatred. Should we keep your kind from having or adpoting children?
"......your kind...."? Really Big D....tsk tsk
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#191852 May 11, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It grieves a lot of us to see a child raised in an environment of ignorance, bigotry and hatred. Should we keep your kind from having or adpoting children?
It grieves me a lot to see you.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#191854 May 11, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
"......your kind...."? Really Big D....tsk tsk
Big D gets all upset and overheated and his inner tyrant comes out.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#191855 May 11, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting. This slander from a supposed professional social worker...
You prove my point VV.
Hey, I'm using my professional opinion based on the events that I believe to be true.

Moving a child from one state to another, then another can be very traumatizing. It interferes with his/her ability to establish roots. It keeps them from being able to regularly see their extended family. It leaves them in a constant state of upheaval.

You did this to them. I'm simply pointing out the facts.

There's nothing slanderous about that.
tumkins

Los Angeles, CA

#191859 May 11, 2013
Big D wrote:
So we can dispense with the ignorance now?
There is no question that a majority of Americans support same sex marriage, which means widespread support of heterosexuals as well
You're nuts, you modesto phaggett.
Big D

Los Angeles, CA

#191860 May 11, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D gets all upset and overheated and his inner tyrant comes out.
Shut up you homsosexual blowhard.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#191861 May 11, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It grieves a lot of us to see a child raised in an environment of ignorance, bigotry and hatred. Should we keep your kind from having or adpoting children?
That's funny, my two sons and 10 plus foster children never felt that way.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#191863 May 11, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, I'm using my professional opinion based on the events that I believe to be true.
Moving a child from one state to another, then another can be very traumatizing. It interferes with his/her ability to establish roots. It keeps them from being able to regularly see their extended family. It leaves them in a constant state of upheaval.
You did this to them. I'm simply pointing out the facts.
There's nothing slanderous about that.
So you want to continue the slander, not only confirming your lack of professionalism, but exposing your ignorance and lack of character to boot.

Again.

Here, let me help you;

Both my boys were born and raised in Hawaii. The oldest is still there. The youngest just finished his second year of college in TN. My wife and I (and the slut lesbian) are empty-nesters in PA.

It was hard for the oldest to leave initially. Now he thanks us for it.

You might consider coming to me about marriage and family issues, you clearly have no clue...

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#191864 May 11, 2013
Thanks Frankie & Pietro.

If I dish it out, I've got to be willing to take it.

The problem is, they have a limp wrist shooting blanks.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#191865 May 11, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Thanks Frankie & Pietro.
If I dish it out, I've got to be willing to take it.
The problem is, they have a limp wrist shooting blanks.
Shucks. I feel all shy and stuff. I never get much positive feedback on this tolerant and diverse forum.

Often I even get threatened with violence by the people of tolerance for being perceived as not tolerant enough!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#191866 May 11, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Shucks. I feel all shy and stuff. I never get much positive feedback on this tolerant and diverse forum.
Often I even get threatened with violence by the people of tolerance for being perceived as not tolerant enough!
Comrades in arms with a lesbian trapped in a straight man.

Now you've done it all!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#191867 May 11, 2013
Interesting site;

http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/
uploads/2011/08/GeorgeFinal.pd f
Big D

Los Angeles, CA

#191868 May 11, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Shucks. I feel all shy and stuff. I never get much positive feedback on this tolerant and diverse forum.
Often I even get threatened with violence by the people of tolerance for being perceived as not tolerant enough!
So when are you three going to consummate your new same sex relationship? You three queers can pony up and get a decent room at Motel 6... drinks too.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#191869 May 11, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
So when are you three going to consummate your new same sex relationship? You three queers can pony up and get a decent room at Motel 6... drinks too.
Now that's not very nice Big D....it's not very tolerant...check the manual.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#191870 May 11, 2013
http://www.legalzoom.com/us-law/immigration/i...

Susan Funaro
Oct 2007


What happens when a family wants to immigrate to the U.S. and their country of origin allows polygamy? U.S. federal law clearly prohibits polygamy among both citizens and immigrants.

[1]

Does U.S. law bend or make exceptions for immigrants?

History of U.S. polygamy laws and immigration

U.S. immigration policies were fairly liberal until the late 1800s. State courts were responsible for the naturalization of U.S. citizens until 1875. It was at this point that the Supreme Court ruled immigration a federal responsibility. And, by 1891, the federal government began processing its first immigrants. That same year new limitations on immigration were clarified. In particular, polygamists were officially barred.

Now let's fast forward to the late twentieth-century. Polygamy crept back into the popular consciousness in the 1970s with the Thai Hmong refugee population. They began to receive public attention when Thai leaders met with a U.S. delegation to discuss that many prospective refugees practiced polygamy.

But it was not until a spokesman for the International Organization of Migration publicly stated that "in practice [polygamy] was negotiable...On paper; they can have one wife only," that controversy grew over polygamy.

Why now?

With greater numbers of immigrants from openly polygamous backgrounds immigrating to the U.S., it seems only natural that polygamy would again be raised as an issue.

What about refugees?

Although refugees have a certain protected status, refugees who resettle to the U.S. must still meet the government conditions for entry. Having refugee status does not guarantee admission. In fact, refugees may be denied entry into the US for a host of reasons; because of criminal records, serious health problems, or drug addiction.

What can a refugee do?

The Bantus of Somalia for example practice polygamy. Many families even have up to four wives. But a number of their other cultural practices may also bring them into direct conflict with the conditions of immigration. For example, the Bantu's practice burning or scarring as a form of healing, discipline their children physically, and perform female circumcision at puberty. All of these customs violate U.S. laws.

To prevent problems, refugee groups are educated about U.S. customs and laws well before immigration. U.S. sponsors also accept the responsibility to help immigrants acclimate to U.S. life and laws. Numerous agencies also exist to support immigrants.

Yet, issues like homeland security, quota control, and refugee policies all complicate immigration. One good starting point for immigration information is the worldwide web. The U.S. government has a portal to information, services, and transactions, including immigration. Immigration lawyers can also help interpret current laws and policies as one navigates to naturalization.

For now, there's no marriage between multiple spouses and U.S. law. But debates over marriage law are in the air thanks to gay marriage.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#191871 May 11, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Now that's not very nice Big D....it's not very tolerant...check the manual.
Someone is using my handle... not me

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ron Fleishman is the World's Most Underrated Ph... (Sep '15) Dec 2 Ron 151
News Man in car exposes himself to woman in Palo Alto Dec 1 Kevin from Michigan 1
Uber for Drones - "Palo Altitude" startup Nov 30 Palo Altitude 1
News Tesla competitor Lucid Motors picks Arizona for... Nov 30 I Got Your Jewels 5
News Trump deportation plan sends South Bay leaders ... Nov 29 spytheweb 2
Sunnyvale Parrot Study (Dec '09) Nov 27 lol 29
News Sunnyvale considers expanding smoking ban to mu... (Sep '15) Nov 19 Haha 30

Palo Alto Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palo Alto Mortgages