Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,743

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189681 Apr 21, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
You rarely participate in a discussion, youíre too busy verbally Gay bashing Gay Americans. Iíve told you this before I support marriage rights for Gay Americans and no others (btw, I donít have to). If you want marriage rights for those who donít currently have it then go fight for it. But, if you think you can suck off the teat of Gay Americans your mistaken. You do realize itís haters like you that backed Gay Americans in to a corner. We got organized, we got funded, weíre smarter and weíre fighting back. The problem with ďmouth piecesĒ like you is that all you do is run your mouth. Youíre not fooling anyone with your hollow support of all forms of marriage. So continue to pat yourself on the back for your childish quips and Gay Americans will continue to fight for and get marriage rights before all is said and done.
What possible harm would a marriage of three consenting adult men cause you? I support those three guys right to equality and a shot at happiness. You do not. I rest my case fruitcake. You are a hater.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#189682 Apr 21, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
I am being cyber bullied on this thread by Marram, VV, Jizzy and Rose_NoHo.
Bullied?!? OH NO!!

Well that does it! I'm going to Walgreen's right now and buy you a sympathy card!

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#189683 Apr 21, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What possible harm would a marriage of three consenting adult men cause you? I support those three guys right to equality and a shot at happiness. You do not. I rest my case fruitcake. You are a hater.
Lolo, the term "fruitcake" went out with Archie Bunker. Update your lexicon.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189684 Apr 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullied?!? OH NO!!
Well that does it! I'm going to Walgreen's right now and buy you a sympathy card!
Yes. Jizzy is stalking me. And he also bullies me. Bill is worse. Bill says it's time for my "dirt nap". He posts a picture of a tombstone with my name on it. He often issues death threats and/or threats of violent homosexual mouth and/or anal rape.

P.S. I like those cards that talk or sing a song when you open them.

P.P.S. Slip some cash in there too!

P.P.S. Walgreens? Real classy. Like Tennessee.

YUK!YUK!YUK! VV!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189685 Apr 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Lolo, the term "fruitcake" went out with Archie Bunker. Update your lexicon.
OK, gotcha Fruitloops!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#189686 Apr 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Baby, I'm an EXCELLENT social worker.
I bet you are, your post's really show your genius.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#189687 Apr 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
As I said before, I read the article in its entirety. Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's study looked at the impact of the anxiety produced from the threat of an electrical shock would have on the sexual responses of a small group of men. They theorize that some men had a sexual response to the possibility of receiving an electric shock.
Having had a penis all my life, I can tell you from personal experience that when I become anxious or frightened, the last thing that happens to my dork is for it to start getting erect.
Now this might not be the case for those few people who get excited by torture.
Now Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's study did not look at erections as it relates to visual stimuli.
Adams, Wright, and Lohr's study DID look at this connection.
Every good study tries to provide a possible theory (or theories) for the results they encountered. It provides a leaping-off point for future research.
But their article still stands as proof that heterosexual men who self-report a strong distaste for homosexuality may have a tendency to become sexually aroused when presented with visual stimulation of homosexual acts.
Their work has not be disproven.
So you like everything about the study except the part where they say our results may be skewed?

Yeah, you are a pro.

Oh, and I would expect someone with a master's degree to use better English. "Their work has not be disproven." Really?

Try this- Their work has not been disproved.

Pick up a dictionary sometime.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189688 Apr 21, 2013
VV has been cyber-bullying me and my whole town.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#189689 Apr 21, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
So you like everything about the study except the part where they say our results may be skewed?
Yeah, you are a pro.
Oh, and I would expect someone with a master's degree to use better English. "Their work has not be disproven." Really?
Try this- Their work has not been disproved.
Pick up a dictionary sometime.
Their data was not skewed by the findings of another group of researchers.

They suggested that there "may be" another explanation for their findings.

After I looked at the work of the other researchers I am of the opinion that a penile reaction due to fear of an electric shock is not the same as a penile reaction due to homoerotic films or pictures.

Why do you have such a problem with this? There are many public figures who have a history of vehemently speaking out against homosexuality, but were then found tapping their toes in public toilets, hiring gay escorts, or having beers at a gay bar.

How do we know you're not another one of "those"? How do we know that any of you regulars aren't some self-loathing, deeply closeted gay or bisexual man?

I think it's an appropriate question.

And finally, I stand by "disproven". It's not like I made up the word. Maybe you haven't heard of "Google". You try looking up the word there.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#189690 Apr 21, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet you are, your post's really show your genius.
Why, thank you so much! I'll be sure to put you on my resume.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#189691 Apr 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Houses in San Francisco do not need air conditioning. Houses in Union City need air conditioning.
I don't like the weather when it gets above 65 degrees. To me, that's too hot. And if it gets in the 90s--forget about it.
What part of TN do you prefer? When I lived there 90 was regularly visited in the summer. Nashville and Knoxville. Memphis too, on the few occasions I went.
Jollo Herbst

Los Angeles, CA

#189692 Apr 21, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
VV has been cyber-bullying me and my whole town.
Uretha City is a run-down hovel and full of kokk slurpers like yourself, Frankie Jizzo.
Do us all a favor and attatch your mouth to the tailpipe of a running car.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#189693 Apr 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand that you just proved that the issues isn't closeted gays in denial, but heterophobia hatred toward anyone who disagrees with calling ss couples married.
Smile.
Do you realize you just typed a bunch of gibberish? I'm sure you had a point in there, somewhere, but I simply can't decipher the comments of a senile old man/lady.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189694 Apr 21, 2013
Jollo Herbst wrote:
<quoted text>
Uretha City is a run-down hovel and full of kokk slurpers like yourself, Frankie Jizzo.
Do us all a favor and attatch your mouth to the tailpipe of a running car.
Reported! Death threat! Bullying! Hate Crime! Homophobia!
SEYMOUR DUCK

United States

#189695 Apr 21, 2013
That dankie guy was invited to the pool party but pulled a O show NO show. sk8 sesh went off well with a barbieQ and bible study, SO FUN. Doing it again next weekend may try a friday night sesh, Aswell! Sk8 0N.

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

#189696 Apr 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullied?!? OH NO!!
Well that does it! I'm going to Walgreen's right now and buy you a sympathy card!
Very funny. I find it amusing when these haters with fragile egos get slapped down they start whining and name calling. Itís very telling about what they bring to this debate and life in general. Wait for it, I expect another tantrum will be coming soon.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189697 Apr 21, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Very funny. I find it amusing when these haters with fragile egos get slapped down they start whining and name calling. Itís very telling about what they bring to this debate and life in general. Wait for it, I expect another tantrum will be coming soon.
Reported! Bullying! Whining! Tantrum!

You are a hater. You wish to deny marriage equality to people you don't like.

I support marriage equality, you do not.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189698 Apr 21, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Very funny. I find it amusing when these haters with fragile egos get slapped down they start whining and name calling. Itís very telling about what they bring to this debate and life in general. Wait for it, I expect another tantrum will be coming soon.
Woops forgot one-

Reported! Name calling!

It's funny when a hater calls you a hater. And it's funny when a hater calls you a name caller. Also it's funny when a hater whines that you are a whining. And it's real funny when someone who wishes to deny marriage equality to marriages he doesn't approve of calls someone who doesn't a hater!

You are a hater.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189699 Apr 21, 2013
Maybe Rose_NoHo will awe "Marram" with one of her intelligent and insightful posts tonight!

Rose_NoHo is a hater. But she hates the same people Marram hates, so she's Marram's hero.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#189700 Apr 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Their data was not skewed by the findings of another group of researchers.
They suggested that there "may be" another explanation for their findings.
After I looked at the work of the other researchers I am of the opinion that a penile reaction due to fear of an electric shock is not the same as a penile reaction due to homoerotic films or pictures.
Why do you have such a problem with this? There are many public figures who have a history of vehemently speaking out against homosexuality, but were then found tapping their toes in public toilets, hiring gay escorts, or having beers at a gay bar.
How do we know you're not another one of "those"? How do we know that any of you regulars aren't some self-loathing, deeply closeted gay or bisexual man?
I think it's an appropriate question.
And finally, I stand by "disproven". It's not like I made up the word. Maybe you haven't heard of "Google". You try looking up the word there.
What on Earth do you mean by "how do you know..."? Are you for real? How about because we said we aren't? You've certainly slipped from accusations to questions, haven't you? I would imagine that in a few more posts, you'll be asking "Hey, any chance that any of you 'regulars' might be a closet case?" P-shah...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Soledad Canyon a " California Wed Ravenite Coffee 2
Need a place to stay asap! Wed Will 1
does anyone need a good dog walker (May '07) Wed chicagodawg 46
News Suddenly, water is everywhere in solar system Tue Beingreal999 2
Rogue Topix Moderators Mar 23 WTSenior 7
News Talking with ... One of the nation's leading di... Mar 23 Controversy 1
News Belmont outlines accomplishments: City Council ... Mar 21 Schmones 1
Palo Alto Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Palo Alto People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]