Hangar One advocates call on Navy to ...

Hangar One advocates call on Navy to maintain protective coating

There are 1 comment on the The Campbell Reporter story from Aug 24, 2013, titled Hangar One advocates call on Navy to maintain protective coating. In it, The Campbell Reporter reports that:

Pressure is mounting against the U.S. Navy to pony up the money needed to maintain a protective coating that was applied to the steel skeleton of Hangar One in Mountain View.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Campbell Reporter.

Bill Hough

San Jose, CA

#1 Aug 27, 2013
Since the summer of 2005, the Navy's position concerning Hangar One was made clear at many public meetings in the Mountain View area. For the past eight years, the reaction from the public continues to be strongly in favor of restoring the Hangar. Despite overwhelming public support for the hangar, a federal buck-passing exercise has been going on for almost a decade. Both the Navy and NASA have been metaphorically tossing the restoration of the hangar around like a hot potato. Everyone gives lip service to restoring the hangar but nobody wants to pay for it. It’s a national disgrace that NASA and the Navy have been blowing off fixing Hangar One.

An offer by the H211 to step up to preserve the hangar should have removed the cost argument from the discussion. You’d think that NASA would jump at the chance at free money to make this PR nightmare go away but you would be wrong.
NASA’s behavior sums up what’s wrong with government. An offer was made for private funding to re-skin the hangar. Paying for the re-skinning was the sticking point in the discussions Then money comes along, and what does NASA do? Stall, diddle and procrastinate. This is why people hate government.

A proper Restoration Alternative would involved re-skining Hangar One in addition to all of the environmental work described in Alternative 2-Implementation of Institutional Controls. As described in the July 2013 newsletter, the Navy's Alternative 2 is fundamentally flawed. It justifies an already-reached conclusion by ignoring the community's strong desire to see the hangar preserved as stated at numerous public forums since 2005. It's time to discard Alternative 2 and prepare an Alternative 3 that meets the joint goals of protecting the environment and preserving history. These goals need not be mutually exclusive.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palo Alto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Facebook's Zuckerberg admits mistakes - but no ... 12 hr FedBook 1
Facebook vs Twitter 14 hr Jimboe 126
News Facebook wants to keep fake news out of Mexico ... 17 hr Keep trolls out eh 1
Ron Fleishman is the World's Most Underrated Ph... (Sep '15) Tue Unique Romance 461
Ron Fleishman is the World's Most Colorful Digi... (Aug '17) Tue Unique Romance 178
Amazon Kindle barring for censorship selling to... Mar 18 Anellie 1
News 'Undocumented' but inspiring (Nov '12) Mar 18 ONLYONETERM 138

Palo Alto Jobs

Personal Finance

Palo Alto Mortgages