Armstrong says he's happy investigati...

Armstrong says he's happy investigation over

There are 7 comments on the KMPH-TV Fresno story from Feb 9, 2012, titled Armstrong says he's happy investigation over. In it, KMPH-TV Fresno reports that:

The stress, the waiting, the whispers about whether he doped during his stellar cycling career, all of it ended when - after nearly two years - federal prosecutors closed an investigation of him last week without bringing any charges.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KMPH-TV Fresno.

Jim Bob


#1 Feb 11, 2012
Me too,also as well.
My Opinion_El Paso_Texas

El Paso, TX

#2 Jun 20, 2012
Makes me wonder why the feds even began this evant, only to close it up afterwards when everyone was claiming that Lance Aremstrong was so guilty. Teds certainly didn't provide any decent reason for their ending it this way.

Now USADA is going to start this case all over again because Taygart is still chomping at the bit and he really wants a piece of Lance Armstrongs ass.
My Opinion_El Paso_Texas

United States

#3 Jun 21, 2012
As my wife does the "Facebook" thing, she has been sharing any of the cycling info that she gets there from her page with me and I found the latrest blog quite interesting, so I figured that I'd share it here.

Since it's a little lengthy, I'll break it down in a few parts.

Cheers Everyone
My Opinion_El Paso_Texas

United States

#4 Jun 21, 2012
USADA’s Travis Tygart Plays Prosecutor, Jury and Judge in Lance Armstrong Case---Part I

Submitted by Tim Dockery on Jun 21, 2012

Imagine walking into a courtroom as the defendant in a lawsuit. The prosecuting attorney reads the charges against you citing nothing more than the testimony of anonymous witnesses as evidence. You object, claiming this is unjust! To your surprise the prosecutor walks to the judge’s bench, puts on a judge’s robe and denies your motion. The prosecutor, still wearing his judge’s robe, then takes out his cell phone and calls three of his friends to serve on your “independent” jury.

This fictitious, but obviously unjust situation is incredibly similar to the case Lance Armstrong currently faces from the United States Anti-doping Agency and its CEO Travis T. Tygart.
A similar investigation led by the United States Department of Justice concluded in February, 2012. After almost two years of investigation, and millions of US tax dollars spent researching Armstrong’s past, the USDOJ decided there wasn’t enough evidence to continue the investigation. So is this just another branch of the Federal government wasting millions of more tax dollars on the same investigation?

No, despite the officially sounding name, it turns out the “United States Anti-doping Agency is not a part of the federal government. Although it receives almost 90 percent of its funding from the federal grants, the USADA is a government program masquerading as a non-profit organization. This non-profit status allows it to investigate and prosecute athletes without affording them the constitutional and due process protections required of other federal agencies. This status also allows it to prosecute athletes with a lower burden of proof than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard that would have been required in the previous investigation by the USDOJ. Finally, it allows a situation where the same man, Mr. Travis T. Tygart is allowed to serve as Prosecutor, Jury and Judge in the investigation of Lance Armstrong.
My Opinion_El Paso_Texas

United States

#5 Jun 21, 2012
USADA’s Travis Tygart Plays Prosecutor, Jury and Judge in Lance Armstrong Case---Part II

Submitted by Tim Dockery on Jun 21, 2012

PROSECUTOR: Tygart initiated the charges.

On June 12, 2012, Travis Tygart and his staff at the USADA sent a letter to Armstrong accusing him of violating anti-doping rules. As evidence of this violation, Mr. Tygart and his staff were only able to cite previous drug tests that Armstrong had passed and the testimony of anonymous witnesses.

In the letter, Mr. Tygart informs Armstrong that he has 10 days to submit evidence to a Review Board that will determine if there is “sufficient evidence of doping” to continue with a full hearing. In his defense, Armstrong can only offer written materials to the Review Board. He will not even be allowed to know the names of the cyclists that have allegedly testified against him.

JURY: Tygart gets to hand pick the Review Board

The “Review Board” will decide whether charges should be brought against Armstrong from the USADA, and whether the case shall go to a full arbitration hearing. Who serves on this review Board? According to USADA protocol 11(b) The independent “review board” shall be appointed by the USADA’s CEO. You read that correctly, Mr. Tygart is allowed to handpick the individuals that serve as the “Jury”, and decide if these charges should move forward. If an athlete had failed a drug test and the board was looking at objective evidence this process might make sense; however, Armstrong has never failed a drug test. All of the evidence in this case is subjective. Mr. Tygart has allegedly caught several other cyclists doping, and offered them immunity in exchange for their testimony against Lance. Shouldn’t the credibility of such a witness be at least considered? Well, let’s assume that Mr. Tygart’s buddies, I mean, the independent “review board” find enough evidence to move the investigation forward, what happens next?
My Opinion_El Paso_Texas

United States

#6 Jun 21, 2012
USADA’s Travis Tygart Plays Prosecutor, Jury and Judge in Lance Armstrong Case---Part III

Submitted by Tim Dockery on Jun 21, 2012

JUDGE: Tygart and USADA staff recommends sanction

Under the Applicable rules, Travis Tygart and his staff at the USADA, will recommend a sanction that will be imposed which may include up to a lifetime of ineligibility from sport. Finally, if Armstrong disagrees with the sanction imposed on him by Mr. Tygart, he can appeal for a full arbitration hearing.

USADA lacks internal and external controls

If Mr. Tygart and staff have the power it appears, what are the internal and external controls at USADA? What would restrict an overly ambitious CEO with an “axe to grind?”According to USADA bylaws, the organization has a very small ten member board of directors. The current director’s are apparently impressed with Tygart and his “Tygarthian” prosecution style of accusing first and looking for evidence later. Unless Mr. Tygart received a pay cut last year, he’s been paid a total of over $1.2 million in compensation and $100,000 in bonuses over the past four years. The spokesperson at the USADA did respond to my e-mail, but she declined to comment whether Tygart’s bonuses were tied to finding a certain number of athletes or a particularly high profile athlete guilty of doping.

So, how are the USADA’s directors chosen? Although the Bylaws allow other organizations to nominate potential directors, the USADA Board essentially has the power to elect their own replacements. This could ensure that only directors sympathetic to the Tygart are ever elected, and removes the accountability that a non-profit board should provide.

Finally, there’s the office of National Drug Control Policy. This is the branch of the Federal government that funds the USADA $10 million a year of federal tax dollars to operate. According to legal counsel for the NDCP office, the $10 million grant is an “unsupervised non-competitive” grant. So, Tygart and staff are guaranteed $10 million a year in funding from the Federal government, but must answer to no one.


Do I think Mr. Tygart has some kind of personal vendetta against Lance? My personal opinion is yes, but I also think actions sometime speak louder than words. The 2012 London Olympic Games are a little more than a month away. Mr. Tygart and his staff are responsible for testing all US athletes headed to the games. However, he has chosen to use the majority of his offices resources investigating whether a retired cyclist doped 16 years ago.

The investigation and sanctioning process at the USADA is unconscionable. The partiality of the prosecutor, the lack of due process for the accused, and the lack of an independent fact finder are completely at odds with our American system of justice and fairness.

In the words of Heinlein,“To give a man power without accountability is to establish a tyrant.”
My Opinion_El Paso_Texas

United States

#7 Jun 21, 2012
Curious to see how many people will take the time in reading the above, more curious to see how many are fed up with this Soap Opera Circis and will actually complain to their political representatives as I and a few others here have done.

Big difference in doing the TALK and doning the Walk!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Triathlon Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Craig Alexander wins 2015 Port of Tauranga Half (Jan '15) Jan '15 bennisonpa 1
News 10 Crazy City Races Competing for Weirdness (Feb '14) Feb '14 Fundies R Mentall... 1
News Premier visits Milton (Feb '14) Feb '14 GTA 1
News One thousand signatures in a week in bid to sav... (Jan '14) Jan '14 nice going 1
News 4 Ways to Get Better Lungs and Make Exercise Ea... (Oct '13) Oct '13 fitnesstips 1
News Lesley Paterson's 12 Trail Running Tips (Oct '13) Oct '13 fitnesstips 1
News Rochester man dies during triathlon (Jul '13) Jul '13 FTW Yall 2
More from around the web