Ah, I see. IF you have these contraindicating diseases and/or are on these medical regimens, "a specialist should advise you."
Hanson was traveling with a specialist. I'm having difficulty finding the reference now, but recall from former research that this specialist was not only a family friend but had treated Hanson's condition for some time prior to the trip the families took together. Also that Hanson had undergone prior hospitalizations due to reactions to SHS. Dr. Hanson had (as he had presented it to the airlines) documentation of his history of abreactions to SHS.
Of course, Dr. Hanson SHOULD have had some nicotine-addicted, denialist crank on Topix advise him, instead of relying on the advice and treatment of an allergist familiar with his medical history.
It said hanson had food borne reactions and he didnt have regular treatment for such at all. He was hospitalized 2 times for food reactions and there was one time he was around smoke for 10 minutes but he never was in the hospital for it. He is a smoke hater or was. He had never been hospitalized for being around smoke but for food borne antrphalaxis REACTIONS after his last bought he started carrying a epenephrine kit. He had emptied 2 bottles of inhaler during the trip plus 2 shots were given. The warnings are it can cause heart problems if to much is given to a person in essence his heart could have burst or went into tachycardia and then into arrythmias that resulted in his death.
The courts seemed to strictly want to stay with tobacco smoke alone and disregarded everything else and this is apparent all the way thru the case even at the USSC. The judge at the 9th circuit was brothers with Justice Breyer on the USSC and he recused himself of the case here.
The more I dig into this case the more it becomes apparent shs/ets was a political scapegoat for the courts and used it to push an agenda! No clear scientific forensic evidence was presented to say yes shs killed this man,the courts instead of just saying that wanted to use it in a diferent context to get to the real prize they were after, the Warsaw Convention is the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air,CH 17. In this they basically redefined what an accident was and delivered an ultra-liberal interpretation that justice scalia and sandra day oconnor were against.
The change was made to include shs in a chain of events that led to death thereby not having to say it was the cause of death but a part of! They couldnt dismiss the doctors own health failings but they sure did anyway....to lead a trail str8 to shs/ets!
This is what we would call a lynching by proxy where no evidence was given to actual cause of death just assumed!