English Monarchy Defrauded People's R...

English Monarchy Defrauded People's Rights

SeekTheTruth

Jersey City, NJ

#1 Mar 21, 2008
English Monarchy Defrauded People's Rights

Any claim of absolute sovereignty rights by the English Monarchy was shown to be non-existent in the Magna Carta of 1215.[Actually 1225, as the 1215 Magna Carta was voided by the Pope.] Yet, over PERSONS, be they natural persons (man under contract of servitude with the Crown, and without right of free will - except for obedience) or artificial corporate bodies, as created by the Crown, there is absolute rights of the MASTER over the servant exhibited by the Crown over the People.

England has been under the Roman system since King John signed over England FOREVER as a vassal state to the Holy Roman Empire/Pontiff/Vatican in 1213. All human institutions are make-believe ships/incorporations in the Roman system. Thus, All corporations and corporate (crew) members are a legal fiction, and are SUBJECTS of the Crown. The British Crown is subject to, or under the Crown of the City of London, the Vatican owned financial, legal and professional controls capitol of the Holy Roman Empire.

The English Monarchy began the defrauding of the English people of their individual rights protecting Anglo-Saxon Common Law in a concerted effort by King Edward I in conspiracy with the Pope of Rome sometime around 1300 AD. The term "common law" and "English common law" was concocted as a fraud; and, is in fact, a system derived directly from Roman civil law - commonly called "dictator's law". As Roman Municipal Law, it points to Mercantile Law used against debtors, as 'municipal' means a debtor territory.

Considering that Anglo-Saxon Common Law period of England preceded the Norman Conquest of England by some 500 years, we have evidence of this fraud posted on the Canadian Federal Justice website:

"The common law, which developed in Great Britain after the Norman Conquest, was based on the decisions of judges in the royal courts. It is called judge-made law because it is a system of rules based on "precedent". Whenever a judge makes a decision that is to be legally enforced, this decision becomes a precedent: a rule that will guide judges in making subsequent decisions in similar cases. The common law is unique in the world because it cannot be found in any "code" or "legislation"; it exists only in past decisions. However, this also makes it flexible and adaptable to changing circumstances."

The primary feature of Roman Municipal Law, a variation of Roman Civil Law,[derived from Maritime Law], used by the deceitful English Monarchy, and it's so-called justice system, was/is the "notwithstanding clause". The Monarchy called this 'Equity'. This clause derives from the fact that Roman Law is based upon all commercial and political organizations, in fact all human institutions, being make-believe ships.

All 'ship's orders'- laws, rules and regulations concerning the ship, have within them the necessary right and duty of the captain to disregard any such rules or regulations when he deems it necessary for the 'good' of the ship. The complete "flexible and adaptable" feature of so-called English or British common law is nothing more than the common usage of the notwithstanding clause to insure that the Crown's pleasures, prerogatives and privileges come before the individual rights of the people.

Complete Magna Carta of 1215 A.D.(King John) version:
The 1215 Magna Carta was declared void by Pope Innocent III
The Pope approved version is the 1225 version signed by King Henry II
http://www.britannia.com/history/magna2.html

Complete Magna Carta of 1297 A.D.(King Edward 1) version:
In this version, we find "freeman" instead of "free man", as in the original,(freeman = slave granted some freedoms), and "person" - a false role or status imposed on a man, thus
showing the beginning of the deception by the King and Pope to Romanize and enslave the English people.
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_doc...
SeekTheTruth

Jersey City, NJ

#2 Mar 22, 2008
England is owned by the Catholic Church. YES that is right the Vatican owns England. The largest global ownership of LAND is the Vatican and the largest collection of MONEY is the British Crown.

Did you know that Queen Elizabeth I wiped out any residual LIBERTY of the Anglican Church in England by subjecting it to the CROWN through the Thirty Nine Articles of 1563?

"The British Crown is subject to, or under the Crown of the City of London, the Vatican owned financial, legal and professional controls capitol of the Holy Roman Empire."

Most people know about Vatican City being its own country with its own police etc. but did you know that the City of London (British Crown) is its own country, all with their own laws and police, and they are NOT SUBJECT to the Queen of England nor the British Parliament? Was everyone aware of that?

Sadly, the English people are the Queen's Subjects and Crown Puppets.
chad sexington

Methven, New Zealand

#3 Oct 28, 2009
my good lord man, you are like the biggest conspiracy dude ever
tigerbutter360

Worcester, MA

#4 Nov 29, 2009
As a US citizen, I have decided to commit treason against my country, give up on the concept of freedom, have sexually perverted hypocrites feed my wafers of bread, as well as serve the decedents of Egypt. It seems the thing to do – all of the intelligence services are doing it – please join us. The American flag is just a rag. The true flag is the three red stars. Please email me so we can conspire against the United States government – do worry! Everyone is doing it. The authorities like it, and so does are great pope and queen.
Kane

Melbourne, Australia

#5 Jul 7, 2013
Ibelieve most of what you say is correct ,but Ithink the Pope in about 1963 handed over all the symbols of Papal power and authority to the United Nations,so in fact the UN has all the prerogatives of the Vatican ,including England.Sometime following the Pope lost his authority as an"Emperor" type figure in the Vatican Court and His former powers became transferred through democracy those of the Senate or the Bishops.And I believe they have agreed to follow the UN in its political aspirations
Kane

Australia

#6 Jul 8, 2013
But if the Pope ,or Vatican already owned the Monarchy following King John 11 act,then Elizabeth 1 would have been their vassal ,so wouldnt have had a choice.Its all very legally convoluted and complicated though, because Acts are amended altered compromised following ,usually some conflict or War, and the shades of grey are overpowering any straight forward black and white statements.And of course at the highest levels everything would have been,and still is, totally secret anyway.All the real history is locked away from the publics view in the Monarchies libraries and the huge Vatican private records.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Christchurch, New Zealand Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Where the Best Green/Meds/Wee-d is found in Chr... 19 hr Montana 1
Discreet Quality Smoke/Hash/Wee-d/Coke & Meds i... Tue Luv 420 1
Is New Zealand really that bad?? Help... (Jun '09) Jul 7 Davids Blame 152
The murderer butcher from ilam Jul 7 Lamb Chop 2
News NZ ugly and full of fat people: book (Jan '08) Jun '16 tongangodz 321
Looking for relatives (Aug '15) May '16 loweann 4
News Bush, Clark and Key identified as possible 'tar... (Oct '07) Mar '16 Up My Ass 24
More from around the web