Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 314719 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#309005 Aug 23, 2013
The subject is the woman's right to choose whether or not to gestate--not gestation itself.

Cur.
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
of course it was. it wasn't about anything "but" gestation.
308537 -
"if the fetus is 'gestating' at the woman's will then it is a wanted pregnancy"
308539 -
"no woman has to 'gestate' that fetus against her will"
308586 -
"why is it a problem that there is no right to 'gestate'?
not about gestation? mutt.
<quoted text>
that's just fabulous.
mutt.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#309006 Aug 23, 2013
He won't get the kid; he's a felon on parole and I would presume also now a registered sex offender. But she can keep him in court for a very long time and at tremendous cost.

The question in my mind is, why the hell did they allow a 14yo rape victim to have a kid to begin with?
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>What happens to the child if the judge takes her seriously, and grants full custody to the rapist who fathered it?
I can't get behind your idea, simply because that possibility even exists.
No Relativism

United States

#309007 Aug 23, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
Lucky for FREEDOMS sake abortion is legal and always will be. Now tell me how a women controlling her own body hurts you.
Duh Huh posted: "tell me how a women controlling her own body hurts you"

1. The baby's body is not mom's body. DNA analysis is definitive regarding this fact.

2. How did Casey Anthony killing her daughter Caylee during her 12th trimester of life hurt you?
No Relativism

United States

#309008 Aug 23, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
The subject is the woman's right to choose whether or not to gestate--not gestation itself.
Cur.
<quoted text>
Actually, the subject is the woman's right to intentionally kill her baby or not.
No Relativism

United States

#309009 Aug 23, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
He won't get the kid; he's a felon on parole and I would presume also now a registered sex offender. But she can keep him in court for a very long time and at tremendous cost.
The question in my mind is, why the hell did they allow a 14yo rape victim to have a kid to begin with?
<quoted text>
cPeterPrance: "The question in my mind is, why the hell did they allow a 14yo rape victim to have a kid to begin with?"

I guess you're not "prochoice" after all.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#309010 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Playa: "Women have the right to life."
So do baby women.
There are no such things. Women are adults, not "babies".

And just by the way, Moron, yes female babies have civil rights too.

Fetuses of either gender, do not.
No Relativism

United States

#309011 Aug 23, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
You can't overlook what doesn't exist.
<quoted text>
cPeterPrance: "You can't overlook what doesn't exist."

A unique, distinct human being most definitely exists in the womb. If s/he didn't exist, why would an abortionist be paid by mom to KILL her/him?

No Relativism

United States

#309012 Aug 23, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
There are no such things. Women are adults, not "babies".
And just by the way, Moron, yes female babies have civil rights too.
Fetuses of either gender, do not.
I do not forget that YOU conceded that "humans" (noun) exist in the womb.

You knowingly & willingly promote killing baby humans.

You are immoral, pathetic trailer trash.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#309014 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
cPeterPrance: "You can't overlook what doesn't exist."
A unique, distinct human being most definitely exists in the womb. If s/he didn't exist, why would an abortionist be paid by mom to KILL her/him?
He was talking about rights, Idiot, not the fetus.
worships reality

United States

#309015 Aug 23, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
The subject is the woman's right to choose whether or not to gestate--not gestation itself.
Cur.
<quoted text>
exactly mutt. which is why if you were truly celebrating a woman exercising her rights, you would have mentioned that during that period "x' number of women also "chose" to continue gestating. you were clearly celebrating only the choice to kill.

uber mutt

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#309016 Aug 23, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
She was under the age of consent for her state. And, IMO, he's only doing it to get out of jail time. It's the judge who should be questioned here. Why they allowed his original decision to stand, I have no idea.
To get child support for the baby ..

Admittedly the guy was a jerk..But then guys,mature much slower
The girls parents well..

That baby still has needs to be met .

The guy is still a jerk ..as he's using the visitation to try to get out of child support..But the girl wants a settlement it says

They both Now that they are adults..need to think of the child IMO.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#309017 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not forget that YOU conceded that "humans" (noun) exist in the womb.
You knowingly & willingly promote killing baby humans.
You are immoral, pathetic trailer trash.
No, but YOU have lived up to your name, No Relevance.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#309018 Aug 23, 2013
Forum wrote:
<quoted text>
Priests and nuns are called by God to live
in his heaven. A euphoria of peace that only
they know. They are close to his angels.
They have to pass the same criteria as any person. It's not enough to be ordained priest or nun.They have to be more enlightened human beings than laypeople, in order to be teachers and leaders.They often fail, as do many holy-men and holy-women.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#309019 Aug 23, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
To get child support for the baby ..
Admittedly the guy was a jerk..But then guys,mature much slower
The girls parents well..
That baby still has needs to be met .
The guy is still a jerk ..as he's using the visitation to try to get out of child support..But the girl wants a settlement it says
They both Now that they are adults..need to think of the child IMO.
He's using the whole situation to try to stay out of jail.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#309020 Aug 23, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
He won't get the kid; he's a felon on parole and I would presume also now a registered sex offender. But she can keep him in court for a very long time and at tremendous cost.
The question in my mind is, why the hell did they allow a 14yo rape victim to have a kid to begin with?
<quoted text>
Sad as the fact is young girls have older boyfriends ..he did not force her ..But she was too young .

Allow her? To have the baby .

I thought the idea was the choice ..even to abort or not was a least with the mom.

Anyway ..She is considered an adult ...now
He is an adult .

If they get the child support thin g worked out..he will probably never
Even want to zed the child..But as the baby's mom

If she has to fight for the CHILD'S right to be supported..then she has to.

It should be automatic..She SHOUKD never have to see the guy ..if she does not want to

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#309021 Aug 23, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
He's using the whole situation to try to stay out of jail.
Well looks like he's using it to get her to Not fight for support which
Is the CHILD'S right not hers .

He's,been ordered to take care of the child ..it is,His,DUTY to do so .

Yes,he's playing the system.

They were both stupid kids,..he should have known better.

The baby SHOULD not have to suffer for the whole mess.

Men who won't pay for their kids,..should go to jail

In this,case the courts have a real club over the guy .

The baby still needs its needs met

The court SHOUKD just say ..hey man. You pay ..that's it or you go to jail ..I agree with that .

Once that was fixed I'm betting he has no real desire to be a pareny
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#309022 Aug 23, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
The "FETUS" is not a life and is living tissue only but not alive... So yea there is the fact.
Duh Huh posted: "The 'FETUS' is not a life and is living tissue only but not alive"
_______

Under oath (Doc.#4:97CV3205) in July 1997, abortionist Leroy Carhart:

*Question: In that situation, when you pull on the arm and remove it, is the fetus still ALIVE?

Carhart: Yes
__________

So, that happened.......

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#309023 Aug 23, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Well looks like he's using it to get her to Not fight for support which
Is the CHILD'S right not hers .
He's,been ordered to take care of the child ..it is,His,DUTY to do so .
Yes,he's playing the system.
They were both stupid kids,..he should have known better.
The baby SHOULD not have to suffer for the whole mess.
Men who won't pay for their kids,..should go to jail
In this,case the courts have a real club over the guy .
The baby still needs its needs met
The court SHOUKD just say ..hey man. You pay ..that's it or you go to jail ..I agree with that .
Once that was fixed I'm betting he has no real desire to be a pareny
She's not the one fighting for child support. She told them she didn't want it. It's the state doing so.

He should go to jail because he molested a 14 year old, don't you think?

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#309025 Aug 23, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
She's not the one fighting for child support. She told them she didn't want it. It's the state doing so.
He should go to jail because he molested a 14 year old, don't you think?
He was,older yes ..She was too young yes.

It says,she does not want support but a,settlement .which sounds,like a lawyer is involved.

The CHILD has the right to support ..it may be paid by either mom or dad,

If she had Bern my kid yes,I'd want him in jail.

They gave him probation because the sex was,consensual..no force involved .

My baby's,dad was 20 I was 16

I was stupid ..he was a jerk

But it's not the same as if some 30 year old teacher talked her into sex or thankfully not that he raped her ..

Thing is,..She is now an adult and a mom .

What I think is the court should tell him

MOM cannot waive child support
YOU HAVE TO PAY .blackmailing this,girl will not get the support waived
As SHE has nothing to do with it..it's,the right of the CHILD ..

I'm betting he,would stop bugging her ..as he probably isn't dad material .
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#309026 Aug 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>They get especially euphoric when they're buried in the rumps of little altar boys....that's a bit TOO close to His Angels, don't you think?
The priests you are talking about
are German.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New York Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Breastfeeding in public? (Feb '16) 8 min Mammals Uber Alles 116
Why do FOX News woman dress like hookers (Jul '15) 11 min BLACKDONGS BLACKS... 291
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 12 min the don 337,984
Whine and Cheese: Where are the crackers (Dec '09) 13 min Little Beaver 1,461
President Trump's first 100 days - Roadmap to D... (Nov '16) 15 min NEMO 4,257
NBC fake news 1 hr friend of robyn hood 2
The United Hates of America (Sep '10) 1 hr friend of robyn hood 2,961
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 2 hr Paul Yanks 45,086

New York Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

New York Mortgages