Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 315230 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#293131 Apr 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
I am curious since I have not been on topix for a while til last week. What type of procedure besides a delivery or c section would be TERMED an abortion.
At 8 months. THIS is a serious question.
Whatever they now call the procedure where they have to make sure the baby is breech posdibly by manually turning it. and then partially deliver before killing it would seem to be a real STREss on a mother already in distress physically..really ramp up her blood pressure!!
HOW else to they ABORT that far along as opposed to delivering.. Can anyone answer??
Sure.

They usually DON'T.

I don't know what kind of abortion porn you're into, but it sounds pretty graphic.

Since the abortion of a fetus at 8 months is done most often when the fetus is already dead, and otherwise done to save the mother's life, any legal 8 month abortion is a medical necessity. Anyone performing or obtaining an abortion for another reason, or killing 'partially born' children, is already acting illegally. That's the point of the laws.

Which brings up an interesting point: who are these women letting movie cameras into the surgical theater, while they get an abortion?

My guess is, they're so-called 'pro-life' advocates, being paid to act in this propaganda.

Are you one of them?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#293132 Apr 23, 2013
razzmatazz wrote:
It would be awesome if this priest was doing this for the sex abuse victims. What a shame your church couldn't care less about them.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#293133 Apr 23, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>You still haven't provided in anything stating it never is. The LTA abortion procedure and the fact the law for life and health stands legal should logically tell you that it is an option of treatment.
NOT for PREeclmapsia in LATE pregnancy, and you just saying something doesn't make it a fact. I provided medical links, so have your PC peers by the way, all stating the facts and it's backed what I've been saying.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#293134 Apr 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Clearly, Lily wants children to be born to parents who won't even take care of them before they're born.
Clearly, Lily is not fit to give lessons in morality, because clearly, Lily is a sadist.
Clearly you don't have adult reading comprehension skills like the rest of the PC posters here.

My posts are only about challenging the LIE that a late term abortion is done for reasons of PREeclampsia in LATE pregnancy.

What you posted has nothing to do with that. Which is typical of PCers here; the masters of posting the irrelevant and of posting lies.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#293135 Apr 23, 2013
A bunch of cultists gathered in
a parking lot and had one of their silly rituals. In the meantime, abortion is still legal and the clinic conducted business as usual.

You standard for something being "awesome" is very low indeed.
razzmatazz wrote:

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#293136 Apr 23, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>All you did was repost the same thing I did. His initial question is not why called him a liar. That's irrelevant. You called him liar for the statement he made.
Anyway, no one looks more the fool than you for going on for days trying to prove why someone you don't know didn't have an abortion.
His initial question shows his AGENDA, like I said, and is very relevant.

I called him a liar for making this statement: "My mom's friend's daughter was 8 months along, and had to have an abortion. I was shocked and asked what happened. Preelampsia."

Abortions aren't done in late pregnancy because of preeclampsia.

Ayakaneo: "Anyway, no one looks more the fool than you for going on for days trying to prove why someone you don't know didn't have an abortion."

No the truth is it's you ignorant buffoons who went on for days arguing about something you don't know anything about, and did so even when info on the medical links proved what I stated was FACT, who look like fools.

I wasn't trying to prove she "didn't have an abortion" you ignorant fool, but that IF she did, it wasn't for preeclampsia.

The beginning, in-between and end of every one of your posts is filled with proof that you don't have adult intelligence or reading comprehension skills. You can't follow anything said here or on links correctly.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#293137 Apr 23, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
D&X procedure
Not for preeclampsia in late pregnancy. You keep going and going day in and out and nothing you post has anything to do with what I challenged STO about or the facts about preeclampsia/eclampsia in late pregnancy.

You're only proving you PCers are mind bogglingly ignorant and senseless.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#293138 Apr 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
I am curious since I have not been on topix for a while til last week. What type of procedure besides a delivery or c section would be TERMED an abortion.
At 8 months. THIS is a serious question.
Whatever they now call the procedure where they have to make sure the baby is breech posdibly by manually turning it. and then partially deliver before killing it would seem to be a real STREss on a mother already in distress physically..really ramp up her blood pressure!!
HOW else to they ABORT that far along as opposed to delivering.. Can anyone answer??
Delivery and c-section wouldn't be termed "abortion" except in the minds of mind bogglingly ignorant and senseless PCers who post here.

The abortion procedure you're talking about is, I believe, the D& X procedure and it's been banned, thankfully, due to the efforts of pro-lifers. Talk about inhumane. Killing a full term fetus and in that way. Unreal. But the PC idiots here would have supported it as long as it was legal.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#293139 Apr 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Sure.
They usually DON'T.
I don't know what kind of abortion porn you're into, but it sounds pretty graphic.
Since the abortion of a fetus at 8 months is done most often when the fetus is already dead, and otherwise done to save the mother's life, any legal 8 month abortion is a medical necessity. Anyone performing or obtaining an abortion for another reason, or killing 'partially born' children, is already acting illegally. That's the point of the laws.
Which brings up an interesting point: who are these women letting movie cameras into the surgical theater, while they get an abortion?
My guess is, they're so-called 'pro-life' advocates, being paid to act in this propaganda.
Are you one of them?
"I don't know what kind of abortion porn you're into, but it sounds pretty graphic."

Only one of you PC idiots would call any kind of abortion "porn". What, you people get sexually aroused seeing something so brutal and so term it "porn"? Because you're the only ones that do.

Apparently your vast knowledge doesn't include the D&X abortions, where the late term baby was pulled out of the vagina feet first; stabbed in the brain with a sharp instrument; head crushed and then the rest of the body delivered. Yeah, it's graphic, and it's also a disturbing truth about what PCers used to support being legal. It's no longer legal because of efforts by pro-lifers.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#293140 Apr 23, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Clearly you don't have adult reading comprehension skills like the rest of the PC posters here.
My posts are only about challenging the LIE that a late term abortion is done for reasons of PREeclampsia in LATE pregnancy.
What you posted has nothing to do with that. Which is typical of PCers here; the masters of posting the irrelevant and of posting lies.
Guess I need to turn up my hearing aid, cuz all I'm hearing outta you is "Blahblahblahblahblah... "

Kinda like the teacher in 'Peanuts', but without the horn...
but thanks for playing.
Sadist.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#293141 Apr 23, 2013
razzmatazz wrote:
No, it's stupid.

What did this gaggle of fetus worshipers accomplish at the clinic that day?

(other than proving they're a gaggle of fetus worshipers, that is)
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#293142 Apr 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Sure.
They usually DON'T.
I don't know what kind of abortion porn you're into, but it sounds pretty graphic.
Since the abortion of a fetus at 8 months is done most often when the fetus is already dead, and otherwise done to save the mother's life, any legal 8 month abortion is a medical necessity. Anyone performing or obtaining an abortion for another reason, or killing 'partially born' children, is already acting illegally. That's the point of the laws.
Which brings up an interesting point: who are these women letting movie cameras into the surgical theater, while they get an abortion?
My guess is, they're so-called 'pro-life' advocates, being paid to act in this propaganda.
Are you one of them?
There was a procedure termed partial birth abortion. One poster says it is now illegal. That is a fact. Look on old topix forums if that is your news source..Thankfully. and hope this is so..
Many Pc posters used to say this was ok
.Glad to see you think of this in a negative way ..it is disgusting that it was ever performed!!

I was really curious about what procedure is used. At 8 months that would be called an abortion..it wa an honest question.. I Abm not talking about dead babies..

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#293143 Apr 23, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"I don't know what kind of abortion porn you're into, but it sounds pretty graphic."
Only one of you PC idiots would call any kind of abortion "porn"..
Uh, we don't watch it. Why would anyone? Do you watch live liposuctions, and colonoscopies too?
Which brings us to your next question:
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>What, you people get sexually aroused seeing something so brutal and so term it "porn"? Because you're the only ones that do..
We refer to it that way, because you so-called 'pro-life'rs get all tiddly over it...and you're the only ones who ever bring it into the discussion.
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently your vast knowledge doesn't include the D&X abortions, where the late term baby was pulled out of the vagina feet first; stabbed in the brain with a sharp instrument; head crushed and then the rest of the body delivered. Yeah, it's graphic, and it's also a disturbing truth about what PCers used to support being legal. It's no longer legal because of efforts by pro-lifers.
Tell me, what does a 'live abortion' gig pay? I ask, because I have a feeling you've been an abortion porn star for years now...

Euww.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#293144 Apr 23, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"I don't know what kind of abortion porn you're into, but it sounds pretty graphic."
Only one of you PC idiots would call any kind of abortion "porn". What, you people get sexually aroused seeing something so brutal and so term it "porn"? Because you're the only ones that do.
Apparently your vast knowledge doesn't include the D&X abortions, where the late term baby was pulled out of the vagina feet first; stabbed in the brain with a sharp instrument; head crushed and then the rest of the body delivered. Yeah, it's graphic, and it's also a disturbing truth about what PCers used to support being legal. It's no longer legal because of efforts by pro-lifers.
It is still legal in extreme cases. It hasn't been performed in years, but if need necessitates, it could be.

Besides, one of the reasons for the gruesomeness of collapsing the skull was for easier delivery and to give the parents the opportunity to hold their dead WANTED baby.

You have no compassion for anything other than what you approve of and/or accept. All you see is what you wanna see -- something like Gosnell performed. Which is untrue; he performed a bastardized version of the D&X.

But comfort yourself in knowing you've left women with the ever so just as gruesome D&E procedure. No holding dead baby afterward, though.

:|
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#293145 Apr 23, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
It is still legal in extreme cases. It hasn't been performed in years, but if need necessitates, it could be.
Besides, one of the reasons for the gruesomeness of collapsing the skull was for easier delivery and to give the parents the opportunity to hold their dead WANTED baby.
You have no compassion for anything other than what you approve of and/or accept. All you see is what you wanna see -- something like Gosnell performed. Which is untrue; he performed a bastardized version of the D&X.
But comfort yourself in knowing you've left women with the ever so just as gruesome D&E procedure. No holding dead baby afterward, though.
:|
WHY NOT DELIVER the baby who in your scenario is going to die anyway and let the mother and dad be with the child and hold and comfort the child as it takes its last breath. I realize some babies such as anencephalic or other genetically doomed children will die shortly after birth. Why make the only thing this baby ever knows be an act of violence..

I am using your example of a wanted child in dire circumstances. NO CHILD SHOULD SuFFER THAT Way..wanted or not.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#293146 Apr 23, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
A bunch of cultists gathered in
a parking lot and had one of their silly rituals. In the meantime, abortion is still legal and the clinic conducted business as usual.
You standard for something being "awesome" is very low indeed.
<quoted text>
Oooo, he said Mass! Take that, Planned Parenthood! Lol
Katie

Auburn, WA

#293147 Apr 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
WHY NOT DELIVER the baby who in your scenario is going to die anyway and let the mother and dad be with the child and hold and comfort the child as it takes its last breath. I realize some babies such as anencephalic or other genetically doomed children will die shortly after birth. Why make the only thing this baby ever knows be an act of violence..
I am using your example of a wanted child in dire circumstances. NO CHILD SHOULD SuFFER THAT Way..wanted or not.
The baby doesn't suffer. The amnio fluid is like an anesthetic. Ending pregnancy is about the woman's health. Unless it's her decision to refuse treatment. That's how these rights work. One pregnant woman at a time. Maybe somebody else would choose a way you describe above.

Why don't you research it yourself and read their stories? They're just as compelling as any other first hand experiences.
Gtown71

United States

#293148 Apr 23, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Oooo, he said Mass! Take that, Planned Parenthood! Lol
;)
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#293149 Apr 23, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
The baby doesn't suffer. The amnio fluid is like an anesthetic. Ending pregnancy is about the woman's health. Unless it's her decision to refuse treatment. That's how these rights work. One pregnant woman at a time. Maybe somebody else would choose a way you describe above.
Why don't you research it yourself and read their stories? They're just as compelling as any other first hand experiences.
You honestly believe that a late term baby. In this case 32 weeks would feel no pain if stabbed in the head before complete delivery?? This is the type of sentiment that kept these procedures legal.for so long until health care professionals gave testimony...

.Don't you think a mom would rather hold a live child as in this example in order to say goodbye as the Pc person who started this discussion about allowing the mom to hold her wanted dead baby.

Why don't they use this magical amniotic fluid for anesthetics..I am sorry. Trying not to get upset or rude. But your statement sounds illogical and very sad.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#293150 Apr 23, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
You honestly believe that a late term baby. In this case 32 weeks would feel no pain if stabbed in the head before complete delivery?? This is the type of sentiment that kept these procedures legal.for so long until health care professionals gave testimony...
.Don't you think a mom would rather hold a live child as in this example in order to say goodbye as the Pc person who started this discussion about allowing the mom to hold her wanted dead baby.
Why don't they use this magical amniotic fluid for anesthetics..I am sorry. Trying not to get upset or rude. But your statement sounds illogical and very sad.
It's a clinical view based on medical science. Unless you're the woman faced with such a difficult choice, you wouldn't have any idea how you'd handle it. But you'd want was safest and legal for yourself. Wouldn't you? You wouldn't want to be one of those women whom society seems to forget about and relegate to the fringes. Would you? All in the name subjective morality?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New York Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 2 min jimi-yank 338,864
President Trump's first 100 days - Roadmap to D... (Nov '16) 15 min Wall specialist 4,591
Drop a Word, Add a Word (Jan '10) 1 hr SweLL GirL 17,035
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 1 hr jimi-yank 45,388
Will OJ take a stab at pay per view to make money? 2 hr Minneapolis KILLS 4
Run,Run, Run, The Republicans are Coming! (Jan '11) 2 hr Marin County 2,261
Add a word, Drop a word (Dec '09) 3 hr Princess Hey 18,371
The United Hates of America (Sep '10) 3 hr DAVID27 3,024

New York Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

New York Mortgages