Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311358 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Anonymous

Hudson, OH

#292412 Apr 14, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Gtown, you can take your clock and shove it straight up your ass. Thanks sincerely in advance for your cooperation.
Listen you, how hypocritical is it for old JEWISH you to claim that this guy is full of it for needing a savior? dont jews need a savior too?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#292413 Apr 14, 2013
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen you, how hypocritical is it for old JEWISH you to claim that this guy is full of it for needing a savior? dont jews need a savior too?
First off moron, I dind't say he's full of shit becuase he NEEDS a savior. Go back. Read. Pay attention this time.

As for "dont jews need a savior too"?

Educate yourself boy.

http://www.aish.com/jw/s/48892792.html
Anonymous

Hudson, OH

#292414 Apr 14, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
First off moron, I dind't say he's full of shit becuase he NEEDS a savior. Go back. Read. Pay attention this time.
As for "dont jews need a savior too"?
Educate yourself boy.
http://www.aish.com/jw/s/48892792.html
a LINK? i gotta read 9 pages on Judiaisism? Aint nobody got time for dat!

Point is you critizised her for claiming we need a savior, why?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#292415 Apr 14, 2013
And you have the right to call my mother "cold-hearted" because she didn't wallow in the miscarriages like you?

We weren't discussing stillboirns, either, you psychopathic moron.

Ist amendment. I have every right to say what I did.

Yes, I suck, and I'm betting a helluva lot better than you can.
Jodi wrote:
<quoted text>
I've had five kids and one full term stillborn. We named that child and gave it a full service. Your mother was/is either a cold hearted person or you made that story up to promote your cause. Either way you have no right saying that what I and others have lost is anything less than a child we loved. You suck.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#292416 Apr 14, 2013
"Messiah" means "anointed", not "savior", specially in the christian context.
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen you, how hypocritical is it for old JEWISH you to claim that this guy is full of it for needing a savior? dont jews need a savior too?
The Prince

Allentown, PA

#292417 Apr 14, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Many actually. As you've been told AND shown before, MANY women wont claim their "child" died after a miscarriage.
I can't imagine ANY woman saying "my baby died", when it wasn't even born.
"We lost the pregnancy" is the most common I've ever heard, including from my mother. In FACT, most Orthodox Jewish women will NEVER say that a baby died, because its NOT a baby. A baby is born.
"I lost a baby" or "my baby died" and "I lost a pregnancy" is two VERY different things.
The closest you ever came to "Orthodox Jewish", is a jewish trick you turned to feed your drug habit, pagan.
The Prince

Allentown, PA

#292418 Apr 14, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
First off Skanky, I dont have to prove SHIT to your stupid ass.
Since I never said anyone was "dragged in his office by force", I CERTAINLY dont have to prove that.
Why would you ask me to prove YOUR LIES y'dumb thing? LOL
<quoted text>
WRONG you stupid bitch. Its known, and is being testified to (which you'd know if you were following the case) that a number of the women did NOT pay for abortions - in two cases, three if you count the woman he murdered - they were not there for abortions AT ALL.
You really should STFU when you dont even know what the hell you're talking about.
<quoted text>
Says the stupid bitch that is using these woman in a negative way for her own agenda.
Gosnell was at the top of the iceberg of the abortion industry. The difference between him and the ones you promote is, he got caught, pagan

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292419 Apr 14, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
This is very similar to your claim that using two or more forms of birth control is 100% effective against preventing pregnancy. No birth control is 100% effective, even when combined with other forms. And it took you a lonnnng time to understand what was being said to you and what you thought was being said to you.
This conversation, regarding pre-eclampsia and abortion or early delivery. Please note the medical sites will state induced delivery will cure the pre-eclampsia. Even on a previability fetus.
So, try to figure out what that actually means. What people have actually been saying to you.
I know exactly what you idiots have been saying.

You pro-choicers have been saying that delivery of a pre-viable fetus, in cases of treating preeclampsia and eclampsia, is an abortion. You've been trying to make that claim by trying to use abortion meaning "ending of a pregnancy", and it being pre-viability as the basis for the claim. The treatment for those conditions is DELIVERY. The fetus isn't purposely being killed so what's done is in no way, shape or form an abortion as RvW ruled on and what the topic of this forum is about. You people might as well just say BIRTH is an "abortion", because it's "ending a pregnancy" and you'd make as much sense as you do making the claims you're making.

You people are unknowledgable, unable to read for comprehension and ignorant buffoons, not to mention irrational fools.



“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292421 Apr 15, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>No one said full term pregnancies required an abortion. 32 weeks is not full term, it's premature.
What the hell are you talking about? Katie did mention "full term" and preeclampsia, which is what I was talking about in my post you responded to with that dribble.

I never said 32 weeks was full term. I have, however, stated that abortion isn't how pre-eclampsia or eclampsia is treated LATE term.

Why do you post? You can't follow what's being said in the posts you respond, and you talk about things that weren't said in the posts you reply to, so you make yourself look like a dimwit.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292422 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
...Birth is A FORM of termination of a pregnancy, just as abortion is.
ALL termination means in this context is "end".
<quoted text>
Not its says "abortion" which you claim is NOT a treatment.
<quoted text>
So is abortion.
<quoted text>
Psssssssst...... ITS A MECICAL NEWS SITE YOU Jackwit! ROFLMAO!
<quoted text>
I never claimed birth is an abortion MORON.
I posted other MEDICAL sites as well. Funny how you ignore them.
Abortion is NOT the treatment for preeclampsia or eclampsia.

The news site you linked was not a medical site, you ignorant buffoon. Your link said after the "news item" you linked:
"This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Pre-eclampsia" All material adapted used from Wikipedia is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Wikipedia® itself is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc."

It was an article using info from Wikipedia about "Pre-eclampsia", which happens to be a site you pro-choicers constantly say is not credible. Oh, but it's only credible when you fools use it, right?

I didn't ignore the medical site you linked. It didn't say abortion was a treatment for those conditions, they all say delivery is.

What the medical site you linked constantly mentioned was consistant evaluation of "patient (and fetus)". In other words, the goal is not to kill the fetus in utero as in [abortion], but to be sure nothing happens toi the patient or the fetus while they're being monitored.

It also states "delivery" is what's mandated once eclmapsia occurs. NOT abortion but delivery.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292424 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
"TERMINATION" can mean birth OR abortion Lynne, you dumbass.
You're talking about a sentence I quoted from a medical site.
"The only cure is termination of the pregnancy at a time as favorable as possible for fetal survival."

"Termination" in the sentence I quoted about preeclampsia/eclampsia from a medical site is not in the context of abortion, dimwit. Anyone who can read for comprehension knows that, because we understand what the words, "at a time as [favorable as possible][for fetal survival]" means. That's the context the word "termination" is being used for those conditions in that sentence, and that means BIRTH not abortion.

Only a dumbass wouldn't get that, like the one who responded to me trying to claim the word "termination" in that sentence can also mean abortion.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292425 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
No Lynne, YOU are the 'ignorant buffon'@@ that's claiming ANYONE claimed abortion and birth are synonymous, since NOBODY has done that.
"TERMINATION" of a pregnancy is the ENDING of the pregnancy, either by birth or abortion.
That does not mean they're synonymous you dumbass ROFLMAO!
Gee, maybe if you'd have not dropped out, you'd know what these words mean! LOLOLOL
Termination in the sentence I quoted only meant DELIVERY/BIRTH.

You're the one who can't read a sentence for comprehension and who thinks the sentence which stated {termination} being "at a time as favorable for fetal survival" could include meaning abortion, when abortion (as in the topic of this forum) means killing a fetus in utero. You don't know diddly squat, Toots.

Keep trying to insult drop outs, while looking like an ignorant buffoon. Funny stuff.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292426 Apr 15, 2013
Pro-choicers think they can equate the term "abortion" as meaning the same thing when used as a term to define abortions just because a woman doesn't want to be pregnant, to having to end a pregnancy because mother WILL die if pregnancy isn't ended.

There's a difference between "therapeutic abortion" like when an tubal pregnancy has to be removed, and an elective abortion because she doesn't want a baby.

There's a difference between an elective abortion because she doesn't want a baby, and a D&C to remove the remains of a fetus that died in utero.

Just like there's a difference between an elective abortion and a miscarriage/spontaneous abortion.

Pro-choice boneheads will reach for any straw to try to make it seem like medical emergencies are equivalent to "I don't want a baby so I'm going to have it killed".

The treatment for preeclampsia is not abortion, as STO claimed, and as my sites and the medical sites Foo linked stated.

Petey claimed awhile back that [late term] abortions were NEEDED for preeclampsia/eclampsia in [late] pregnancy because women WILL die without it, when facts is DELIVERY is what's done in [late term pregnancy].

That was a general statement Petey made and it was a lie. STO claimed abortion was needed for [preeclampsia]. That's a lie.

Nothing Foo provided proved their claims true.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#292427 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're full of shit as usual Lynne.
Clearly, we're EXTREMELY important to you.
If we weren't, you wouldn't be posting so OBVIOUSLY obsessively to try to discredit us.
See, the problem with your claims, is that its been well known you're full of shit since 2006 when you first started posting here, thus, you're credibility as to what you THINK about anyone else is worth less than the shit on your shoe.
ROFLAMO!
Foo: "Clearly, we're EXTREMELY important to you."

Wrong. The subject of abortion is important to me. You dimwits aren't.

Foo: "If we weren't, you wouldn't be posting so OBVIOUSLY obsessively to try to discredit us."

Wrong again. I post to prove facts.

You're someone who posts obsessively trying to discredit pro-lifers. You people discredit only yourselves.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#292429 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Bet our abortion rates wouldnt be in the millions annually if a woman faced prison. She SUDDENLY would have to learn to prevent pregnancy . I bet she'd learn fast.
Now...well...she can act irresponsibly ...because she can alway have a killing back up plan.
She...she...she...she...what about he?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#292430 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>Becasue she's not smart enough to spell it right twice in a row? <<GRIN>>
My personal opinion is Skanky thinks it makes her old posts harder to fine. She's wrong about that too LOL!
The games fundies play now...

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#292431 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I get it now....FORCE. woman to gestate an unwanted" "ZEF" if its after your deadline. NO choices for her and you support that.
You people are proabortion when you say so but anti -choice after that.
Hypocrites.
Sit down. You're a joke.
And you simply refuse to face reality in your desperate attempts to force your beliefs on women everywhere.

We ALL know that there are laws and restrictions on everything in our society...EVERYTHING. A woman has time to make her choice. She does get a choice at some point. That is the bottom line.

Keep making yourself look like a fool on this. That is your choice.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#292432 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey foo? Wanna answer this?
I will.

Depending on the stage of the pregnancy it was either an embryo, a zygote or a fetus.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#292433 Apr 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
That doesn't answer the question. Why is your god so cruel?
<quoted text>
The fundies don't bother to address the gross inconsistencies in their bible and their religion.

I guess they figure if they just ignore them they'll go away.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#292434 Apr 15, 2013
Jodi wrote:
<quoted text>
I've had five kids and one full term stillborn. We named that child and gave it a full service. Your mother was/is either a cold hearted person or you made that story up to promote your cause. Either way you have no right saying that what I and others have lost is anything less than a child we loved. You suck.
How dare you judge his mother. Everyone handles things differently.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New York Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 2 min FuMan Chu Yanks 329,779
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 15 min jimi-yank 40,261
Time to go? (Jun '15) 19 min Lacking 11,989
Nassau/Suffolk High School Football (Nov '11) 30 min HS Football Fan 13,333
Drop a Word, Add a Word (Jan '10) 59 min rainmaker2016 14,673
Add a word, Drop a word (Dec '09) 1 hr rainmaker2016 15,470
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr An NFL Fan 60,150
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Dec '14) 2 hr friend of shameless 11,007

New York Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

New York Mortgages