Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310652 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#286750 Feb 25, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think there is any truth in this article?
http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/14...
It backs up what we have been saying.
Theres nothing there that states PP is falsifying the numbers, which is what wacko sapphire and never relevant have claimed.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#286751 Feb 25, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah the wording is biased but the PP annual report is offical or do you think they made it up?
You can't go by the numbers of abortions, referrals, and exams, then pretend that the one figure you don't like is "made up".
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#286752 Feb 25, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah the wording is biased but the PP annual report is offical or do you think they made it up?
PP provides whatever service the person chooses. If someone chooses not to have a child, it would be silly to provide an adoption referral, wouldn't you say?
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286753 Feb 25, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Theres nothing there that states PP is falsifying the numbers, which is what wacko sapphire and never relevant have claimed.
Nobody said anything about falsifying. We said that one woman could receive several 'services' along with her abortion making the percentages of abortion to 'services' lower. It's all in the way you want the stats to look.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286754 Feb 25, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
PP provides whatever service the person chooses. If someone chooses not to have a child, it would be silly to provide an adoption referral, wouldn't you say?
I already answered this but I do think adoption should be mentioned as an option in the consultation 'service'.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#286755 Feb 25, 2013
SapphireBlue wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if I said rape was no exception, I'd never hear the end of that either.
Just askin' a question.

Why do you personally see a difference between a zef conceived due to rape and a zef conceived due to consensual sex?

Why not answer?

lucy

UK

#286756 Feb 25, 2013
Shoud the muslim race get away with this check it out on my youtube www.youtube.com/lucygreytv

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#286757 Feb 25, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody said anything about falsifying. We said that one woman could receive several 'services' along with her abortion making the percentages of abortion to 'services' lower. It's all in the way you want the stats to look.
A service is a service. No matter how many services one woman receives, they are still separate services?

One, what other "services" COULD she be receiving at the same time as an abortion? Are they handing her BC pills while she's on the table? Doing cancer screenings while the abortion is going on? Is she watching videos on sex ed during? Reading pamphlets? Getting an adoption referral?

Two, are they not supposed to ennumerate the other services just because she is ALSO having abortion?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#286758 Feb 25, 2013
Too many questions marks, sorry.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#286759 Feb 25, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I already answered this but I do think adoption should be mentioned as an option in the consultation 'service'.
And you know it's not, how?

Are you too stupid to realize that the numbers for adoption referrals are for the women who accepted them? It says nothing about what is offered.

Nevermind, yes you are that stupid.
Gtown71

United States

#286760 Feb 25, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Do Mormons reject Christianity? Some Christians would say yes, but the Mormons would say no.
Get it?
I had an angel hand me 2 gold plates, but I couldn't read them, so I sent them off to cash for gold :)
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#286761 Feb 25, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody said anything about falsifying. We said that one woman could receive several 'services' along with her abortion making the percentages of abortion to 'services' lower. It's all in the way you want the stats to look.
Both sapphire and no relevance have said that PPs numbers were fixed or falsified.

Yes, well a pregnancy test is not an abortion.
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#286762 Feb 25, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I already answered this but I do think adoption should be mentioned as an option in the consultation 'service'.
If someone comes in for a consultation, I would imagine adoption is given as an option, but that would not count as a referral. All You fundies want to look at the stats with you own personal slant. Again, a pregnancy test or check up is not an abortion, but you seem to want to count it like as one. How silly.
someoneuknow

Akron, OH

#286763 Feb 25, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Both sapphire and no relevance have said that PPs numbers were fixed or falsified.
Yes, well a pregnancy test is not an abortion.
You ignorant sob posting with a name like that. STFU, you are a PIG! A total pos under MY shoe.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#286764 Feb 25, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody said anything about falsifying. We said that one woman could receive several 'services' along with her abortion making the percentages of abortion to 'services' lower. It's all in the way you want the stats to look.
You asked if they were "made up". WTF is "made up" if not "falsifying"?

Every time I think you can't get any dumber, you do.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286765 Feb 25, 2013
someoneuknow wrote:
<quoted text>
You ignorant sob posting with a name like that. STFU, you are a PIG! A total pos under MY shoe.
I have asked her before, why she wants to call herself 'feces'. I think it is low self esteem.
No Relativism

West Lafayette, IN

#286766 Feb 25, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
That was my point. It's not fully formed.
I'll repeat the question since you must have missed it:

Are you saying at 14-weeks gestation, the human in utero is not at a stage of life?
STO

Vallejo, CA

#286767 Feb 25, 2013
SapphireBlue wrote:
<quoted text>
Only two choices. Leave them alone or toss them. What's done is done.
I'm glad to hear you don't want to force women to gestate them.

That's a start.
No Relativism

West Lafayette, IN

#286768 Feb 25, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you be kind enough to provide a link to that report?
"To arrive at that 3 percent figure, Planned Parenthood does some fudging and misdirection. Planned Parenthood depreciates the role abortion plays by defining its “services” in such a way that it avoids accounting for their time and expense. A single pregnancy test is designated by Planned Parenthood as a “service” and thus given equal weight to a far more time-consuming and expensive surgical abortion procedure, another Planned Parenthood “service.” Likewise, each pack of birth control pills is considered a service and carries the same weight in the calculation as an abortion. Using this rubric, Planned Parenthood justifies the claim the President of Planned Parenthood, Cecile Richards, has made that abortion is,'a very small part of what we do.'"

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/10/05/false-abor...
No Relativism

West Lafayette, IN

#286769 Feb 25, 2013
Several “whistleblower” lawsuits call into question whether the 3 percent claim is true even under Planned Parenthood’s formula, as the lawsuits allege over-reporting of other “services.”[vi])

Though you won’t hear Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards offer this statistic in an interview, her organization’s own materials acknowledge that 11 to 12 percent of its patients receive abortion services.[vii] Although a more honest depiction than a breakdown by “services,” this figure still does not capture what abortion means to Planned Parenthood’s bottom-line.

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/10/05/false-abor...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New York Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Drop a Word, Add a Word (Jan '10) 10 min rainmaker2016 12,756
Add a word, Drop a word (Dec '09) 11 min rainmaker2016 13,966
"Walking Dead" Starts Feb 9th (Jan '14) 18 min jimi-yank 576
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 19 min Russell797 57,219
Word Association (Jul '10) 32 min Roxie Darling 7,573
Time to go? (Jun '15) 32 min Injudgement 7,679
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Dec '14) 34 min Guinness Drinker 8,977
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 1 hr jimi-yank 324,863
More from around the web

Personal Finance

New York Mortgages