Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310332 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Katie

Spanaway, WA

#286084 Feb 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
There is a waiting list for couples waiting to adopt a baby.
Proaborts should automatically be placed at the end of the waiting list. Prolifers move in front of proaborts on waiting list.
Proaborts don't value human life.
So, accept the consequences baby-killers.
Where is the logic here?

You make no sense, NR. Bad day?
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#286085 Feb 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Bacon Bit: "What her choice IS , is irrelivant."
Her choice is not "irrelevant" to the baby in her womb.
Actually, it is, since what's in the womb isn't capable of having choices.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#286086 Feb 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
According to the Associated Press:
In stripping Neuhaus of her license, the board accepted the findings of an administrative judge, who concluded in February that Neuhaus “seriously jeopardized” the care of her patients. The case against her involved mental health exams done in 2003 on 11 patients, ages 10 to 18. The judge said Neuhaus’ records didn’t contain enough information to show that she did thorough exams….
Neuhaus’ reports for Tiller, compiled with a “PsychManager Lite” computer program, were five pages or less and don’t cite details from patients’ statements or data gleaned from her exams. The administrative judge concluded Neuhaus simply “answered yes/no questions” using the computer program and assigned whatever diagnosis the computer gave.
The judge also said that in some cases, the young patients were described as suicidal, but Neuhaus didn’t recommend further treatment.
Hugely important but summarily ignored in all mainstream media reports thus far is that all records used to revoke Neuhaus’s medical license came from evidence obtained in former Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline’s investigation of Tiller.
Responding to today’s news, Kline noted the following points in an email:
1.Tiller committed all the aforementioned abortions for temporary mental health concerns.
2.The mental health diagnosis was not supported by the record.
3.There was no evidence Neuhaus ever saw a patient.
4.There was no evidence Neuhaus was in the clinic at any time to see the aforementioned patients.
5.Neuhaus simply signed a form letter printed by Dr. Tiller that read “I find there will be severe an irreversible damage to a major bodily function of the mother….”
6.Neuhuas received about $350 for every letter she signed.
7.In deposition Neuhaus could not recall any patient she had rejected, although she claimed she was certain she had.
8.Neuhaus was recommended to Tiller by Larry Beuning, then Executive Director of the Kansas Board of Healing Arts, who was appointed by then Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. His wife is Vicki Buening, who at the time was Sebelius’s director of constituent affairs. Beuning is now gone.
9.The board action confirmed the findings of an administrative law judge. The ALJ made his findings after numerous days of hearings. The board took only 30 minutes to confirm the Judge’s recommendation.
Where's your link? I provided a link earlier. And the info is not matching yours. It matches PLM sites, though. You gave credit to the AP, so show a link.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286087 Feb 23, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
No for being pedphiles. But I suspect you know that, and are just being obnoxious on purpose - much like you're stupid on purpose.
No he was talking about gay priests having sex with other young men. Pay attention to the subject matter.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#286088 Feb 23, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
not emotion sweetheart, personal belief. let's not change what you said OK?
.I'm not "trying" to do anything. I speak only fact. perhaps you need a refresher course on laws and how they are created. they start off as bills that are written as a result of someone's "personal belief" or at least what they believe the majority of their constituents personal beliefs are regarding what rules and guidelines we should live by as a society. The House and then the Senate vote on whether they agree that this bill based on someone's personal belief, should be law.
now I'll ask you again. do all laws disconcert you?
What are you talking about now? Perhaps you need to refresh my memory of what you're talking about. It's been a long day.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286089 Feb 23, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
No for being pedphiles. But I suspect you know that, and are just being obnoxious on purpose - much like you're stupid on purpose.
He didn't mention pedophiles, did he?

Guppy said:

The catholic church is against abortion etc.

BUT

They're not against priests going out with male escorts and doing drugs etc. etc. etc.

I wonder if they go to confession?

He wants them in jail because they are sexually active gays.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286090 Feb 23, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's your link? I provided a link earlier. And the info is not matching yours. It matches PLM sites, though. You gave credit to the AP, so show a link.
I would be happy to see your infomation that doesn't match mine.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#286091 Feb 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I would be happy to see your infomation that doesn't match mine.
Scroll back a page or two, maybe three.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#286092 Feb 23, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
Ward came home after work and his wife looked really pissed. As he sat down with the family to eat, he finally asked, Whats the matter June". June replied, "I'm sore, you were really hard on the beaver last night".
Did you hear that one from your priest? Did he slip it into his homily during Mass?
grumpy

Stony Point, NY

#286094 Feb 23, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
"Pro-choicers support choice. Not a particular choice."
To support all choices, is to support each choice.
To support a ballot with more than one choice is to support all the names on the ballot?????
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#286095 Feb 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
This from the spelling nazi.
?? When have I corrected anyone's spelling??

Those of your kind sure seem to love nazi's and their imagry.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#286096 Feb 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Here it is again. Please answer:
Katie shared that she is peri-menopausal.
When she enters the stage of post-menopausal, will you consider her no longer "fully formed"?
Yes or no?
Still makes no sense. You're comparing an adult woman to a fetus at 14 weeks gestation? A fetus that has approximately 26 more weeks to develop before being born? Maybe you should put the bottle away for awhile.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#286097 Feb 23, 2013
The real Ladilulu wrote:
LMAO!! Now we know you are the Knut.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#286098 Feb 23, 2013
The real Ladilulu wrote:
<quoted text>You couldn't do what I do , your too fat. You lay on an old sofa smelling of cat urine with cat feces in between the couch cushions and eating butter N bacon sandwiches all day long. You yell at your poor poor mullet topped children to get your fix of butter N bacon sandwiches. Your only exercise is taking your *magic wand* and impaling the mice in your house.
Another fine follower of Jesus.
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#286099 Feb 23, 2013
The real Ladilulu wrote:
<quoted text>You couldn't do what I do , your too fat. You lay on an old sofa smelling of cat urine with cat feces in between the couch cushions and eating butter N bacon sandwiches all day long. You yell at your poor poor mullet topped children to get your fix of butter N bacon sandwiches. Your only exercise is taking your *magic wand* and impaling the mice in your house.
I bet you claim to be christian.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286100 Feb 23, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
?? When have I corrected anyone's spelling??
Those of your kind sure seem to love nazi's and their imagry.
Had the wrong Bit, maybe. I can see that you might not recognize incorrect spelling.

The nazi reference was to the 'soup nazi' on the Jerry Seinfeld Show. Guess they loved the imagery too.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#286102 Feb 23, 2013
who="Katie"]<quot ed text>
And somehow you are trying to equate this to mean it's based on "someone's" emotions. Their ideals. As if there were no basis in law included.
Will you, just once, post without deception of one sort or another?
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
not emotion sweetheart, personal belief. let's not change what you said OK?
Let's not. So why did you forget to include my use of the words, "Their ideals,"? If you weren't trying to change what I said, okay.
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
.I'm not "trying" to do anything. I speak only fact. perhaps you need a refresher course on laws and how they are created. they start off as bills that are written as a result of someone's "personal belief" or at least what they believe the majority of their constituents personal beliefs are regarding what rules and guidelines we should live by as a society. The House and then the Senate vote on whether they agree that this bill based on someone's personal belief, should be law.
now I'll ask you again. do all laws disconcert you?
Is that what you think? Bills written as a result of someone's personal belief or the majority of personal beliefs? As in Mob Rule?? Because the way I was taught was different. It wasn't about personally held beliefs, but in solving the problem using already existing laws. Oh, there's that phrase I used earlier. The one you tried to argue against.

Well argue against this and see how far you get.

"Once a problem is identified, possible solutions for the problem must be identified and discussed. In the American political process, there are generally more than enough proposed solutions to the problems the nation faces. The difficulty lies in sorting through the proposed solution to find the one that will work best. When a member of Congress proposes a bill, he or she is essentially claiming to have found the best (or at least most practical) solution to the public policy problem in question."

"Writing legislation requires precision, attention to detail, an intimate understanding of existing laws and a clear understanding of the proposed policy solution."
http://www.thisnation.com/textbook/legislativ...

Again, I ask, will you just once not use deception as a means of making your point?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#286104 Feb 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Again.
Fine. Feel free to prove me wrong.

We'll wait.

***cue Jeopardy music**
Gtown71

United States

#286105 Feb 23, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>ll
You're socially retarded.
On the same scale, that you are spiritualy retarded?

I reread numbers 5 again, in a different version, but still no sign of your abortion :)
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#286106 Feb 23, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Was Tiller not aborted?:)
Sad, but to me it is the same deal, just a difference in time.
Yes it is the same deal. Tiller aborted thousands of humans lives and now somebody aborted his. What surprises me is the reaction from the proaborts.*His* life was *suppose* to be valued but the thousands that he killed somehow weren't?

How convenient?.

ALL human life is sacred. Location of that life has no bearing on that no matter what cockamamie excuse or *opinion* is given.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New York Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Time to go? 8 min CSA - Voice of Am... 2,399
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 30 min NYStateOfMind 319,303
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Dec '14) 48 min Younohoo 5,699
The most fact that discrimination is everywhere... 49 min dGo mDaedn lyHo i... 2
last post wins! (Jun '10) 2 hr Princess Hey 25,977
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Brian_G 54,351
News Cutting of pastor's role called 'vindictive' (Oct '08) 2 hr Bruser 8,003
More from around the web

Personal Finance

New York Mortgages