Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311629 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Guppy

Bloomfield Hills, MI

#286073 Feb 23, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
You know, just because someone is not a prude, doesn't mean they think about/have sex all the time. You're being ridiculous.
Peter does.

Do you read his comments?
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286074 Feb 23, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
Form letters? I would like to see you try to prove this. Since I know you cannot, we can chalk your foolishness up to sheer pettyness.
According to the Associated Press:


In stripping Neuhaus of her license, the board accepted the findings of an administrative judge, who concluded in February that Neuhaus “seriously jeopardized” the care of her patients. The case against her involved mental health exams done in 2003 on 11 patients, ages 10 to 18. The judge said Neuhaus’ records didn’t contain enough information to show that she did thorough exams….

Neuhaus’ reports for Tiller, compiled with a “PsychManager Lite” computer program, were five pages or less and don’t cite details from patients’ statements or data gleaned from her exams. The administrative judge concluded Neuhaus simply “answered yes/no questions” using the computer program and assigned whatever diagnosis the computer gave.

The judge also said that in some cases, the young patients were described as suicidal, but Neuhaus didn’t recommend further treatment.

Hugely important but summarily ignored in all mainstream media reports thus far is that all records used to revoke Neuhaus’s medical license came from evidence obtained in former Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline’s investigation of Tiller.

Responding to today’s news, Kline noted the following points in an email:

1.Tiller committed all the aforementioned abortions for temporary mental health concerns.
2.The mental health diagnosis was not supported by the record.
3.There was no evidence Neuhaus ever saw a patient.
4.There was no evidence Neuhaus was in the clinic at any time to see the aforementioned patients.
5.Neuhaus simply signed a form letter printed by Dr. Tiller that read “I find there will be severe an irreversible damage to a major bodily function of the mother….”
6.Neuhuas received about $350 for every letter she signed.
7.In deposition Neuhaus could not recall any patient she had rejected, although she claimed she was certain she had.
8.Neuhaus was recommended to Tiller by Larry Beuning, then Executive Director of the Kansas Board of Healing Arts, who was appointed by then Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. His wife is Vicki Buening, who at the time was Sebelius’s director of constituent affairs. Beuning is now gone.
9.The board action confirmed the findings of an administrative law judge. The ALJ made his findings after numerous days of hearings. The board took only 30 minutes to confirm the Judge’s recommendation.

Guppy

Bloomfield Hills, MI

#286075 Feb 23, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Peter is obsessed. He weaves it into every comment. He needs to take a vacation from it.
I'm worried that Peter will get aides. I don't want that to happen. He needs to cut back, that would lessen his chances.
worships reality

United States

#286076 Feb 23, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
And somehow you are trying to equate this to mean it's based on "someone's" emotions. Their ideals. As if there were no basis in law included.
Will you, just once, post without deception of one sort or another?
not emotion sweetheart, personal belief. let's not change what you said OK?
.I'm not "trying" to do anything. I speak only fact. perhaps you need a refresher course on laws and how they are created. they start off as bills that are written as a result of someone's "personal belief" or at least what they believe the majority of their constituents personal beliefs are regarding what rules and guidelines we should live by as a society. The House and then the Senate vote on whether they agree that this bill based on someone's personal belief, should be law.
now I'll ask you again. do all laws disconcert you?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#286077 Feb 23, 2013
The real Ladilulu wrote:
<quoted text>You couldn't do what I do , your too fat. You lay on an old sofa smelling of cat urine with cat feces in between the couch cushions and eating butter N bacon sandwiches all day long. You yell at your poor poor mullet topped children to get your fix of butter N bacon sandwiches. Your only exercise is taking your *magic wand* and impaling the mice in your house.
Any fool can watch TV and lie on a message board all day long. The above post is a perfect example of the latter. There is not one true word in it.

I have better things to do with my time that watch the idiot box.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#286078 Feb 23, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
I never bring it up, but Peter always does. I'm just trying to prove a point. He's obsessed with it.
Don't be so bitter.
Bull.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286079 Feb 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Bacon Bit: "What her choice IS , is irrelivant."
Her choice is not "irrelevant" to the baby in her womb.
This from the spelling nazi.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286080 Feb 23, 2013
Guppy wrote:
They should build a prison just for priests. It would be overflowing.
The guards could be the crazy nuns.
For being homosexual?
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#286081 Feb 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
For being homosexual?
No for being pedphiles. But I suspect you know that, and are just being obnoxious on purpose - much like you're stupid on purpose.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#286082 Feb 23, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
I never bring it up, but Peter always does. I'm just trying to prove a point. He's obsessed with it.
Don't be so bitter.
You're not doing the *stupendous* job you think you're doing, though. Better luck next time.
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#286083 Feb 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
There is a waiting list for couples waiting to adopt a baby.
There's thousands of children waiting for homes. But those children aren't healthy whites.

So according to the logic of extremists like yourself, to hell with THOSE children, and lets force women to gestate against their will, just so those people can have their lilly white babies.

You are sickening.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#286084 Feb 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
There is a waiting list for couples waiting to adopt a baby.
Proaborts should automatically be placed at the end of the waiting list. Prolifers move in front of proaborts on waiting list.
Proaborts don't value human life.
So, accept the consequences baby-killers.
Where is the logic here?

You make no sense, NR. Bad day?
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#286085 Feb 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Bacon Bit: "What her choice IS , is irrelivant."
Her choice is not "irrelevant" to the baby in her womb.
Actually, it is, since what's in the womb isn't capable of having choices.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#286086 Feb 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
According to the Associated Press:
In stripping Neuhaus of her license, the board accepted the findings of an administrative judge, who concluded in February that Neuhaus “seriously jeopardized” the care of her patients. The case against her involved mental health exams done in 2003 on 11 patients, ages 10 to 18. The judge said Neuhaus’ records didn’t contain enough information to show that she did thorough exams….
Neuhaus’ reports for Tiller, compiled with a “PsychManager Lite” computer program, were five pages or less and don’t cite details from patients’ statements or data gleaned from her exams. The administrative judge concluded Neuhaus simply “answered yes/no questions” using the computer program and assigned whatever diagnosis the computer gave.
The judge also said that in some cases, the young patients were described as suicidal, but Neuhaus didn’t recommend further treatment.
Hugely important but summarily ignored in all mainstream media reports thus far is that all records used to revoke Neuhaus’s medical license came from evidence obtained in former Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline’s investigation of Tiller.
Responding to today’s news, Kline noted the following points in an email:
1.Tiller committed all the aforementioned abortions for temporary mental health concerns.
2.The mental health diagnosis was not supported by the record.
3.There was no evidence Neuhaus ever saw a patient.
4.There was no evidence Neuhaus was in the clinic at any time to see the aforementioned patients.
5.Neuhaus simply signed a form letter printed by Dr. Tiller that read “I find there will be severe an irreversible damage to a major bodily function of the mother….”
6.Neuhuas received about $350 for every letter she signed.
7.In deposition Neuhaus could not recall any patient she had rejected, although she claimed she was certain she had.
8.Neuhaus was recommended to Tiller by Larry Beuning, then Executive Director of the Kansas Board of Healing Arts, who was appointed by then Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. His wife is Vicki Buening, who at the time was Sebelius’s director of constituent affairs. Beuning is now gone.
9.The board action confirmed the findings of an administrative law judge. The ALJ made his findings after numerous days of hearings. The board took only 30 minutes to confirm the Judge’s recommendation.
Where's your link? I provided a link earlier. And the info is not matching yours. It matches PLM sites, though. You gave credit to the AP, so show a link.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286087 Feb 23, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
No for being pedphiles. But I suspect you know that, and are just being obnoxious on purpose - much like you're stupid on purpose.
No he was talking about gay priests having sex with other young men. Pay attention to the subject matter.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#286088 Feb 23, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
not emotion sweetheart, personal belief. let's not change what you said OK?
.I'm not "trying" to do anything. I speak only fact. perhaps you need a refresher course on laws and how they are created. they start off as bills that are written as a result of someone's "personal belief" or at least what they believe the majority of their constituents personal beliefs are regarding what rules and guidelines we should live by as a society. The House and then the Senate vote on whether they agree that this bill based on someone's personal belief, should be law.
now I'll ask you again. do all laws disconcert you?
What are you talking about now? Perhaps you need to refresh my memory of what you're talking about. It's been a long day.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286089 Feb 23, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
No for being pedphiles. But I suspect you know that, and are just being obnoxious on purpose - much like you're stupid on purpose.
He didn't mention pedophiles, did he?

Guppy said:

The catholic church is against abortion etc.

BUT

They're not against priests going out with male escorts and doing drugs etc. etc. etc.

I wonder if they go to confession?

He wants them in jail because they are sexually active gays.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#286090 Feb 23, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's your link? I provided a link earlier. And the info is not matching yours. It matches PLM sites, though. You gave credit to the AP, so show a link.
I would be happy to see your infomation that doesn't match mine.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#286091 Feb 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I would be happy to see your infomation that doesn't match mine.
Scroll back a page or two, maybe three.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#286092 Feb 23, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
Ward came home after work and his wife looked really pissed. As he sat down with the family to eat, he finally asked, Whats the matter June". June replied, "I'm sore, you were really hard on the beaver last night".
Did you hear that one from your priest? Did he slip it into his homily during Mass?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New York Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Human Sexuality Forum Discontinued 9 min Jennifer 57
Giants talk back (Dec '06) 14 min About Face 5,128
Poll 2015 topix biggest loser (Jan '15) 22 min Sonya 54
Poll Which one is the biggest Obama lover on topix, ... (Nov '14) 23 min Sonya 9
Poll Momma chamberlin, what was his biggest secret e... (Aug '12) 24 min Sonya 105
Poll Most laughable threats made by Tman_mets/Momma ... (Jun '15) 26 min Sonya 62
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Dec '14) 43 min NEMO RINO Republican 11,970
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 17 hr jimi-yank 332,103
Nassau/Suffolk High School Football (Nov '11) Sun ChiefFan1 13,371

New York Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

New York Mortgages