Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

[lil Lily]

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
We are talking physiologically. Quit moving the goal posts in this long ago discussion that shoulda been over when I gave my answer the first time.
What is your objective here? To discredit me? To win? To prove something?

Physiologically, it's a newborn infant upon exiting mother's body. No longer fetus, no matter how many times you want to claim that cord cut and breathing is when changes occur from fetus to infant. NOTHING MEDICAL backs your claim. Are you brain damaged? WTH?

[lil Lily]

Katie: "What is your objective here? To discredit me? To win? To prove something?"

LOL, what is YOUR objective, Toots?

You've already discredited yourself; you lost this debate from the first post you made with your opinion, based on what you claimed was fact which wasn't; and you haven't proven a thing except that you're an uneducated and ingorant buffoon who thinks she knows it all and keeps proving she doesn't know anything.

It's beyond you to stop defending your stupidity. When you PCers post stupidity, PLers wiull reply with the proven facts. Don't like it? Stop posting ignorance and stupidity.

[Katie]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
Physiologically, it's a newborn infant upon exiting mother's body. No longer fetus, no matter how many times you want to claim that cord cut and breathing is when changes occur from fetus to infant. NOTHING MEDICAL backs your claim. Are you brain damaged? WTH?

How is any newborn physiologically different than a fetus whose cord hasn't been detached and who hasn't begun to breathe without it, yet?

[lil Lily]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
ROFLMAO Isn't it cute when Lynne tries (and fails) so DESPERATLY to justify "someone ELSES" life issues?
BTW Lynne, you were NOT LEGALLY an adult when these things happened. Having a kid, getting pregnant or marrying young doesn't make one LEGALLY an adult. Age of majority was STILL 21 back then....?

I reply with facts on whatever topic I have some facts. The facts of Lynne's life have been posted by Lynne, and linked several times.

Foo: "Having a kid, getting pregnant or marrying young doesn't make one LEGALLY an adult. Age of majority was STILL 21 back then."

Yes, you ignorant buffoon, it does. Once MARRIED, the minor is then legally an adult. In order to GET married, legally, they have to be considered an adult first, in most states, often parents have to sign to allow the marriage. But once married, that person is considered a legal adult able to make their own legal decisions in their life.

The rest of your post ignored because it's more of your uneducated stupidity.

[lil Lily]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
ROFLMAO Isn't it cute when Lynne (sic) tries (and fails) so DESPERATLY to justify "someone ELSES" life issues?
...

Not like you do that, right? You're not justifying Gerri Santoro's
"life issues", are you?

You're so inept in discussion.

[lil Lily]

Kenose wrote:

<quoted text>
and how many have you adopted?

Are you against child abuse? How many children have you removed and saved from abusive parents, hypocrite?

You think because people don't adopt that they don't have a right to speak against something, you nitwit?

[Gtown71]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
ROFLMAO You're full of shit.
<quoted text>
Sorry Chuckles, no, there are NO absolutes when it comes to faith and religion.
That's what makes each relationship so private and unique.
<quoted text>
Nope.
<quoted text>
I dont keep Him locked away from others in the appropriate situations during appropriate times and discussions. Appropriate suitations include those for whom I have love and respect. I have neither for you.
I dont keep my Lord, my child, my wife, or any person I love locked away from others either, as many here can attest.
<quoted text>
See? THere you go LYING and bearing false witness AGAIN.
<quoted text>
No, its a PRIVATE relationship. Privacy and the appropriacy of keeping some things private is something you dont seem to have a good grasp on.
<quoted text>
I'm not uncomfortable at all talking about real issues. I dont have any issues regarding my relationship with my Lord.
I'm 1000%+ comfortable with my relationship with G-d. I simply dont feel a need to discuss Him with the likes of you, OR to babble on endlessly about it. You clearly have ZERO respect for others beliefs, so why SHOULD I?

You've not told me anything about your god, for me not to respect.

Plus are you absolutly sure that there are no absolutes?

[Gtown71]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
You're LYING yet again. Where EXACTLY did I ever "blame" ANYONE other than how the LAW let her down?
And where EXACTLY did I "DEFEND" the picture of Gerri Santoro? I posted it as a FACTUAL example of what happens and how women died when religious fools briefly took away the right of CHOICE from them. Period. There's no defense necessary.
Correcting yours and Lynne's stupidity is not defencse, its refuting garbage with FACTS.
<quoted text>
Clearly you are, or you woudldnt feel a need to babble on endlessly about it ALL the time as if it matters at the end of the day to anyone BUT you.
Clearly you ARE extremely insecure about the strength of your faith, or you wouldn't be so OBVIOUSLY threatened when people of OTHER faiths tell you frankly, that you're full of shit.
To US, you ARE 100000% full of crap. Your faith is YOURS. Your story is YOURS. Not anyone elses. After the first 10 times hearing it, its old. Topix is NOT your personal pulpit, and we are NOT your parishoners.
Want to preach? Go find a church. You've testified. Endlessly. Can you even express a thought WITHOUT going on about how you 'found g-d'? I doubt it. YOU are the poster child for an uneducated extremist, someone that's incapable of rational, independant, intellectually honest thought.
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO Clearly many's sarcasm goes over your head and between your knees. LOLOL! To Skanky and the one or two other idiots that egg you on, you're a useful idiot, nothing more. Hell, the ones that are giving you 'positive feed back" @@(Feedback is one word by the way moron) are as phonly in their "faiths" as you are turning out to be.
People can be both religious AND faithful, or simply just spiritual and be able to have whole discussions WITHOUT having to rant on about their religion incessently.
Now you're free to rant on endlessly, and uselessly here - that's your right and America is great that way. But WE are in return, free to call you out for the asshole you are. Deal with it.

You seem to love to rant more then any, but at the same time you use words like us and we, as if all others are in agreement with you. Lol

And I'm the insecure one?

You seem to have graduated from the school of Bill and Hilliary Clinton.

You say things like you never blamed anyone for the ladies death, but then say it was religeous idiots who took away her right?

I truly think you have done this for sooo long. That even you believe what you say to be true.

You still haven't talked about a god, for me to either respect or not, and the only time you speak of religion, it is in a very negative note.

I believe all that you write toward me, is no more than your inner person trying to send you a message.

What "we " call a not from the counter of the obvious.

[lil Lily]

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
How is any newborn physiologically different than a fetus whose cord hasn't been detached and who hasn't begun to breathe without it, yet?

The cord not being detached has nothing to do with. I've already posted before that the changes (circulatory) occur at first breath, and that first breath can happen as soon as baby is expelled from mother's body and placed on her abdomen/chest, cord is still attached. Physiologically, no longer a fetus but newborn infant still attached to cord. Your claims about a "process" that takes "24-48 hours" has nothing to do with a newborn infant still "technically" being anything but a newborn infant.

[Katie]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
The cord not being detached has nothing to do with. I've already posted before that the changes (circulatory) occur at first breath, and that first breath can happen as soon as baby is expelled from mother's body and placed on her abdomen/chest, cord is still attached. Physiologically, no longer a fetus but newborn infant still attached to cord. Your claims about a "process" that takes "24-48 hours" has nothing to do with a newborn infant still "technically" being anything but a newborn infant.

You are changing the parameters again. I clearly stated cord not cut, not exchange of gases except through the cord. Newborn hasn't breathed on its own. Therefore, you agree with what I've said since the beginning. Took you long enough.

Good night.

The End!

[Anonymous]

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:

<quoted text>
"banks"
Do banks still get robbed?
"office buildings"
Did the World Trade Center have armed guards?
"the white hosue"
Cuz Dick Cheney might be lurking in the bushes.

exactly.........so since those places still get attaced, you're admitting to everyone one here that security guards do absolutely NOTHING and are therefore useless........

?????

[Anonymous]

Guppy wrote:

<quoted text>
I'll refresh your memory.
What should a 16 year old girl do if she gets pregnant from a one night stand with an 18 year old boy?
Honestly, I have no idea what you are talking about.
If you have enough money to get wasted every night, you have enough money to adopt kid/s.
You must be very young.
Wait, wait, wait. If you need money, go the foster care route. OMG, those poor kids........

if "I" get wasted every night? "I" do not, but if i did, i still wouldnt have the vast amount of money it would take to adopt/raise a kid

"What should a 16 year old girl do if she gets pregnant from a one night stand with an 18 year old boy?" - what? wait, so b/c a guy happens to be 2 years older than the mother the mother should therefore kill the unborn, not allow it a chance to live? b/c the dad is TWO years older ?

[Ocean56]

Conservative Democrat wrote:

I wonder how many catholic idolaters would be willing to adopt this woman's kids, just so the kids can have an enjoyable life.
Probably not one of them. Their "job," as they see it, is done; the kids were born. Who cares about them after they're born.
That's their f*cked up M.O.

Exactly, C.D. But what else can we expect of a religious ideology that forbids all forms of reliable birth control to prevent unwanted pregnancy in the first place? Very little, if anything at all.

[holdencolfield75]

What's more boring, abortion or Islam?

[Conservative Democrat]

Bitners ex husband wrote:

<quoted text>The coward can't answer the question LMAO.

Isn't I don't know an answer??

How about you answer my question dweeb; were you there???

[Conservative Democrat]

Bitners ex husband wrote:

<quoted text>Why did your wife leave you? She met a hung brother down there in Boca? Your kind of women are known for that

How original!!

[Conservative Democrat]

worships reality wrote:

<quoted text>scary, scary post. such anger and hatred directed toward the young. do you work or live anywhere that brings you in any proximity whatasoever with children? if so you need to be reported immediately.

Go right ahead. I have a 9 year old of whom I have custody and I drive her to school every day. Since you know my location, you can figure out who to call.

So, get to calling.

[Conservative Democrat]

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>Why, why, why are you having this discussion with a poster on topix that calls himself God? You look as silly as Foo.

Entertainment Inkstain.

[Conservative Democrat]

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>There are long lists of would be parents waiting for babies, even those with colic. Why weren't they put up for adoption so that they could share a life with people who want them?

That's a question I can't answer Inkstain. Can't you figure not out for yourself??

[Conservative Democrat]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>CD 'Lawyer': Abortion is a pre-emptive strike. Prevention of another criminal being brought into society, prevention of extreme emotional distress to the mother for having to raise the byproduct.
Why don't you get a sex change operation; get a uterus implanted in you, get raped, conceive, then you can raise the f*cking bastard on your own? Deal?

I have to ask again: Were you raised by rabid monkeys?

Your post is inhumane, and is a direct assault on the dignity of human life.

Did it piss you off? Good!!!