Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311604 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Tom Tom

Allentown, PA

#279218 Jan 22, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
They have no sense of humor...
<quoted text>
The comissioner of "massage therapists", Thong Long Dong, MTD. Would disagree with you.
Tom Tom

Allentown, PA

#279219 Jan 22, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I agree with your last statement!
Tell me, can you name just one person on this topic who opposes you, that you have not called a liar?
Yet I caught you in a lie more then a few times, but that doesn't matter, becouse I'm certain you've told other lies and it only takes one lie to make you a liar.
Thia is why you need a savior.
Your God sent you one.
You reject Him.
Of course she rejects God. She is a faux-jew, who uses that platform as cover for her proabportion pagan attacks on
Chrisitns and unborn children.
She isn't fooling anyone. She lives the most non-jewish life one can live. She denies God and his rule. She is anger, hate and dispair personified. She is indeed a sad caricature and I feel sorry for her. I really do.
I pray God has mercy on her soul as she knows not what she does.
Independent voter

Hollywood, FL

#279220 Jan 23, 2013
What a woman does with her OWN body is ONLY her business.

Let us not allow Christian "sharia" to govern us.

Since: Jan 13

Houston, TX

#279221 Jan 23, 2013
VoteVetsOrg, There were way more pressing things going on during his term in office. I'm a Pro-Lifer for sure, but that doesn't mean I have any right to decide what an expecting mother is to do with her, or her unborn child. I do think it is a shame! That woman who willfully procreate, then decide they do not want the child anymore, so they just end his/her life is a shame.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" -John Locke
Ocean56

AOL

#279222 Jan 23, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
Young people are impressionable. If you can implant the idea into the minds of young women that motherhood is nothing but hardships than this will implant the idea that motherhood is a bad thing.
So you would prefer that people LIE to women about motherhood and deliberately keep the hardships it involves from them, I suppose. Sorry, sparky (not really), I'm not going to do that just to make anti-choice imbeciles like you happy.

IMO girls and women need to make an INFORMED decision about motherhood, and they can't make an informed choice when they don't know ALL the facts.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#279223 Jan 23, 2013
Tondaleyo wrote:
<quoted text>Your conscience is bothering you soooooo much your sweatin' bullits.
ROFLMAO I hope that's a nice fantasy for ya Knutbar! LOL

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#279224 Jan 23, 2013
Tondaleyo wrote:
<quoted text>You need to know something... NO ONE LIKES Mahoney, not even the Pope, Mahoney is not welcomed anywhere. Mahoney gets what he deserves.
I'm sure. He made a good sacrifical lamb for the RCC. Toss his ass to the wind and claim denial.
Ocean56

AOL

#279225 Jan 23, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
There are some things in life you should do despite the risks involved and having children is one of them.
That's not YOUR call to make, goofy, and this is the kind of PRESSURE of girls/women I was talking about earlier.

Contrary to your BACKWARD belief that "having children is something you should do," girls and women DO need to have ALL the facts about motherhood so they can make an INFORMED choice. Otherwise, they make the decision in ignorance, which is never a desirable outcome.
Ocean56

AOL

#279226 Jan 23, 2013
Bitner wrote:
Why, when your side does nothing BUT point out the good things? Given your...ahem....."logic "....THEY should also be pointing out the hardships, right? Then why aren't you fussing about it to them as well?
Exactly, Bitner. The anti-choice crowd want girls and women to know ONLY the good things about motherhood, not the hardships of it. Because, according to their "logic," if girls/women know "too much" about these hardships, some or even many of them might decide never to be mothers at all.

Wouldn't THAT be anathema to the backward-thinking idiots who think women are good for ONE thing only; reproduction.

Katie

Seattle, WA

#279228 Jan 23, 2013
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>
".You are not involved in any of this" - so b/c im not a woman im not entitled to at least TALK/debate about it? BS...
"cares what anyone's opinion of the baby" - actually they DO, MILLIONS of us who believe its a person BEFORE birth not just when the last foot passes the vaginal canal......
"Why are you asking me?" - i told you, b/c i want to know why/how nuts like you can believe it isnt a person until birth, or worse, once its FULLY birthed
so, 3/4ths born, PERSON or NOT???
It isn't about how "nuts like you can believe it isn't a person until birth". It's about how our laws are applied to a ZEF before and after birth.

After a complete birth, baby has personhood and civil rights. I don't make up the rules. So my opinion of it doesn't matter one iota. You wanna talk about it to someone, and create some involvement through conversation, talk to someone else. I am not interested in this.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#279229 Jan 23, 2013
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>
There, TRASH………happy? still wanna claim you NEVER SAID these things?
p. 13091, post 278220
“See above post about how you are no longer going to be able to purchase your favorite phallac symbol, tiny.”
p.13084, post 278062
“people want to own weapons of mass destruction and corporations want to get rich selling them. It can not be allowed to continue.”
p. 13091, post 278218
“you keep all that in mind while we ban your guns and ammo, Princess.
p. 13082, post 278030
“Again, delusions of grandeur, and straw men aside, watch as your guns of mass destruction are banned”
p. 13082, post 278032
“Say bye bye to the semi automatics and high capacity clips, dummy”
And my personal favorite, in response to my THREE paragraph “non argument,” Chicky’s ONLY response was:
“Yeah, again, nonsense and straw men aside, watch as we ban your murder weapons.”
p. 13081, post 278014
Should I repost this to each individual liberal friend of yours on here? I think I might…..turd &#61514;
None of this means working to remove your civil right to bear arms. It's involving semi-automatic weapons. We don't have a right to bear semi-automatic weapons.

Unlike you who IS working to remove women's civil rights to personal privacy and bodily autonomy.

Hypocrite.
Ocean56

AOL

#279230 Jan 23, 2013
Katie wrote:
You're welcome, Ocean. It is a myth that "mothers never regret having their children" I agree. And personal anecdotes aside, I have observed many mothers exasperated by the sheer hard work involved, the sense of betrayal of not being given a full picture of mothering/parenting.
Yep. After reading that "mothers never regret having their children" MYTH from yet another anti-choicer, I decided to do a little online research. So I went to Google and typed in "women who regret becoming mothers."

There were quite a few sites with stories of many women who wish they had never become mothers in the first place and want their old life -- the life they had BEFORE having kids -- back. Many of them wrote that if they HAD known exactly how hard motherhood was, they would have made the childfree choice instead and would have made sure they never got pregnant at all.

I think one reason why many girls/women didn't know all the hard facts about motherhood before having a baby is because they relied on the wrong people to provide accurate information; the family members, who DIDN'T want them to know. As I said before, I think the practice of keeping girls/women ignorant of the hardships of motherhood is a bad practice that needs to change. So I'll do what I can to change it. Whether the anti-choice imbeciles approve of my doing that or not is irrelevant.


Ocean56

AOL

#279231 Jan 23, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
You PCers should encourage every young girl/women to try to raise a baby if/when she gets pregnant. They should never be encouraged to 'wimp out' and get an abortion if/when they get pregnant.
Awwwwwww, it must be so tough for you, dude, knowing you have NO power or authority to dictate what prochoicers "should" and "should not" say or do. Too bad for you, you DON'T have it.

Personally, I prefer that girls/women know ALL the facts about motherhood long before a pregnancy even happens. Unfortunately, no contraceptive method is 100% guaranteed against unwanted pregnancy, so even if a girl/woman is on birth control, there is still a small possibility that an unwanted pregnancy can occur.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#279232 Jan 23, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure. He made a good sacrifical lamb for the RCC. Toss his ass to the wind and claim denial.
Eenie meenie mienie moe, which one of our scummy priests will go...
Ocean56

AOL

#279233 Jan 23, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
You're not only not reading her right, your reading comprehension is for shit.
So true! The guy's hopelessly STUCK IN THE PAST, by at least a few decades if not two whole centuries. In the 19th century, the conservative guys didn't want girls educated beyond a certain level. In the beginning of the 19th century, I believe ALL colleges were closed to women students.

That was the time when many people really believed in the idiocy of the "woman's sphere," the "cult of true womanhood," and other such nonsense. This moron's "thinking" is right along those lines, judging from the idiocy of his posts.
Ocean56

AOL

#279234 Jan 23, 2013
sasssylicious wrote:
Of course you will. You are on a mission. You had a negative experience with pregnancy and motherhood. That's YOU. Speak for yourself, not as a fact.
WHERE did I say I had a negative experience with motherhood, sASSy? I'll tell you; NOWHERE. So that's another LIE you keep spewing because you don't like my saying that motherhood involves a lot of HARDSHIPS, something you obviously DON'T want girls/women to know about. You've demonstrated many times that you have no problem LYING about prochoicers who say things YOU don't like or approve of. This is just another such occasion.

The way I see it, girls and women NEED to know about these hardships, which ALL parents know about by the way, so they can make an INFORMED decision about motherhood rather than making it in ignorance and then deeply REGRET becoming mothers later. YOU prefer that they remain in ignorance. I'm not interested in your preferences, so I'll go on raising those facts as often as I think necessary. Deal with it.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#279235 Jan 23, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
It isn't about how "nuts like you can believe it isn't a person until birth". It's about how our laws are applied to a ZEF before and after birth.
After a complete birth, baby has personhood and civil rights. I don't make up the rules. So my opinion of it doesn't matter one iota. You wanna talk about it to someone, and create some involvement through conversation, talk to someone else. I am not interested in this.
lol. That's how fundies work... you state the truth as science or as law defines and they blame you for it's existence. How dare you.
feces for jesus

East Meadow, NY

#279236 Jan 23, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I take credit for when I mess up.
You telling someone how a christian is suppose to be is really an oximoron.
How would you know anything about the heart of a child of God, when you clearly don't have one.
You still have the same heart, like I had, before God changed it.
Typical christard judgement. You're lower than scum.
feces for jesus

East Meadow, NY

#279237 Jan 23, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
The One true God has always been and always will be.
He chose to call His only begotten son (God the son) Jesus.
Unprovable garbage.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#279239 Jan 23, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical christard judgement. You're lower than scum.
That's kind of harsh. I don't think he's scum. I think he's dumb... quite dumb.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New York Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Time to go? (Jun '15) 16 min Patriot 12,515
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 1 hr jimi-yank 331,884
Breastfeeding in public? (Feb '16) 1 hr Sally 25
News Ashley Garced, 18, aspiring nurse, loyal friend (Apr '07) 2 hr Ashieka82 5
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Dec '14) 2 hr Enough 11,890
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 2 hr jimi-yank 41,476
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Heretic 61,014
Nassau/Suffolk High School Football (Nov '11) Tue You are smoking 13,361

New York Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

New York Mortgages