Hague prosecutor disappointed at Croats' acquittal

There are 34 comments on the Bellingham Herald story from Nov 21, 2012, titled Hague prosecutor disappointed at Croats' acquittal. In it, Bellingham Herald reports that:

Protesters burn a Croatian flag during the protest in front of the presidency building in Belgrade, Serbia, Saturday, Nov.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Bellingham Herald.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Serbonazis

Buffalo, NY

#1 Nov 21, 2012
Prosecutor is wrong and the court is right by overturnig the injust sentence to Gotovina and Markac. In WWII, only the Nazis, the aggressors paid the price, not the Allies. The aggressors in 1991 war were the Serbs. Fact!!!!
Serbonazis

Buffalo, NY

#2 Nov 21, 2012
Look the name of the contributing writer for this newspaper, a Serb. They never write anything objectively. This is how the Serbs oparate since 19th century.
Karolcik

Czech Republic

#3 Nov 21, 2012
Serbonazis wrote:
Prosecutor is wrong and the court is right by overturnig the injust sentence to Gotovina and Markac. In WWII, only the Nazis, the aggressors paid the price, not the Allies. The aggressors in 1991 war were the Serbs. Fact!!!!
May be from the point of view of your country. But fom the Czech and Slovak point of view, things look somewhat different. We couldn't regard the JNA as an aggressor in 1991 (as regards Croatia) or in 1992 (as regards Bosnia), as these countries were unrecognized by our MFA in those years and it was actually them who had violated the Yugoslav constitution (that consitution not allowing the Yugoslav republics to secede). Since Croatia's and Bosnia's recognition in 1992 and 1993 respectively, we have considered their actions legal and legitimate (and their actions prior to that recognitions may surely be regarded as retroactively legalized), but certain consequences of the pre-recognition status quo remain, such as that Yugoslavia's representatives can't be held responsible for waging aggressive war.
But I'am talking merely on behalf of us.
Serbonazis

Buffalo, NY

#4 Nov 21, 2012
Karolcik wrote:
<quoted text>
May be from the point of view of your country. But fom the Czech and Slovak point of view, things look somewhat different. We couldn't regard the JNA as an aggressor in 1991 (as regards Croatia) or in 1992 (as regards Bosnia), as these countries were unrecognized by our MFA in those years and it was actually them who had violated the Yugoslav constitution (that consitution not allowing the Yugoslav republics to secede). Since Croatia's and Bosnia's recognition in 1992 and 1993 respectively, we have considered their actions legal and legitimate (and their actions prior to that recognitions may surely be regarded as retroactively legalized), but certain consequences of the pre-recognition status quo remain, such as that Yugoslavia's representatives can't be held responsible for waging aggressive war.
But I'am talking merely on behalf of us.
your premises are absolutely wrong. Slovak do not like the Czech and vice versa. Slovakia is a separate country. Communist Constitution allowed secession. Read again the Constitution. Serbs and the JNA were not the protector of country of communist yugoslavia. Serbs are the aggressor like Nazis in WWII. Fact and period!!!!
bwin

Albania

#5 Nov 21, 2012
Serbonazis wrote:
<quoted text>your premises are absolutely wrong. Slovak do not like the Czech and vice versa. Slovakia is a separate country. Communist Constitution allowed secession. Read again the Constitution. Serbs and the JNA were not the protector of country of communist yugoslavia. Serbs are the aggressor like Nazis in WWII. Fact and period!!!!
Exactly! Being a republic allows an entity the secession. Republic is a state.

“A man's character is his fate”

Since: Jun 10

Heraclitus

#6 Nov 21, 2012
Serbonazis wrote:
<quoted text>your premises are absolutely wrong. Slovak do not like the Czech and vice versa. Slovakia is a separate country. Communist Constitution allowed secession. Read again the Constitution. Serbs and the JNA were not the protector of country of communist yugoslavia. Serbs are the aggressor like Nazis in WWII. Fact and period!!!!
Da nece ti da gu objasnis, majke ti ga bezobrazne

“A man's character is his fate”

Since: Jun 10

Heraclitus

#7 Nov 21, 2012
Serbonazis wrote:
<quoted text>your premises are absolutely wrong. Slovak do not like the Czech and vice versa. Slovakia is a separate country. Communist Constitution allowed secession. Read again the Constitution. Serbs and the JNA were not the protector of country of communist yugoslavia. Serbs are the aggressor like Nazis in WWII. Fact and period!!!!
Which nationality you are ?
CCCC

Ljubljana, Slovenia

#9 Nov 21, 2012
The_Baron wrote:
<quoted text>
Which nationality you are ?
shiptar
Katana

Sliema, Malta

#10 Nov 21, 2012
Some shiptar jew whose ancestors escaped the holokaust of SS skanderbeg and fled to buffalo ny, usa
Katana

Sliema, Malta

#11 Nov 21, 2012
Ante popisam se na te wrote:
<quoted text>...this serb puppet Carla Deponte is retired, so who is asking her for any comment and judgement? No more than anyone is asking former president Jimmy Carter for his opinion on American politics!
You weren't saying that she's a Serb puppet when she gave order for Milosevic, Hadzic, Karadzic and Mladic to be arrested you two faced croat nazi f...k

And now she's a Serb puppet... die motherf...er
reality

Adelaide, Australia

#12 Nov 21, 2012
Karolcik wrote:
<quoted text>
May be from the point of view of your country. But fom the Czech and Slovak point of view, things look somewhat different. We couldn't regard the JNA as an aggressor in 1991 (as regards Croatia) or in 1992 (as regards Bosnia), as these countries were unrecognized by our MFA in those years and it was actually them who had violated the Yugoslav constitution (that consitution not allowing the Yugoslav republics to secede). Since Croatia's and Bosnia's recognition in 1992 and 1993 respectively, we have considered their actions legal and legitimate (and their actions prior to that recognitions may surely be regarded as retroactively legalized), but certain consequences of the pre-recognition status quo remain, such as that Yugoslavia's representatives can't be held responsible for waging aggressive war.
But I'am talking merely on behalf of us.
u are talking merely on behalf of urself, the jugo (1973) constitution allowed secession.
jugo was controlled by serbia at that time, they wanted complete control, which is against the stated principles of tito and every non serb in that ex cuntry.
reality

Adelaide, Australia

#13 Nov 21, 2012
Katana wrote:
<quoted text>
You weren't saying that she's a Serb puppet when she gave order for Milosevic, Hadzic, Karadzic and Mladic to be arrested you two faced croat nazi f...k
And now she's a Serb puppet... die motherf...er
she has money in serbistan now
Serbonazis

Buffalo, NY

#15 Nov 23, 2012
bwin wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly! Being a republic allows an entity the secession. Republic is a state.
I agree with you 100%.
NIKOLA

Pyrmont, Australia

#17 Nov 27, 2012
hahaha They Hate you as well as hat you hahaha
Serbonazis

Buffalo, NY

#18 Nov 27, 2012
NIKOLA wrote:
hahaha They Hate you as well as hat you hahaha
Vojvodina is next country that will be separating itself from former communist yugoslavia which collapsed in 1991.
Banovic

Ljubljana, Slovenia

#19 Nov 28, 2012
Serbonazis wrote:
<quoted text>Vojvodina is next country that will be separating itself from former communist yugoslavia which collapsed in 1991.
Vojvodina was is and always will be Serbian land
Serbonazis

Buffalo, NY

#20 Nov 28, 2012
Banovic wrote:
<quoted text>
Vojvodina was is and always will be Serbian land
Vojvodina was not a servian land, sir. It was Austrian and Hungarian until 1918. your servian memory is very short!!!!
truth

Perth, Australia

#21 Feb 14, 2013
Occupation Croatian historic land still goinggggggg.
corupt international justice support political economical as well war over Croatian historic land.

Human rights not yet exist for Croats.
&li st=PLEFD1176E73BFFB1A

1260 YEARS GENOCIDE
AND ECONOMICAL FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
truth

Perth, Australia

#22 Feb 14, 2013


ajde ptropali sude nazovi jos jedan put

ajde nazovi jos jedan put propali sude

http://www.youtube.com/watch...
truth

Perth, Australia

#23 Feb 14, 2013


neka zive obicaji nase Hrvatske srednje bosne

kuci djecice
negledajte propalih politicara i propalih sudovaaaaaaa

kuci djecice
nase sve nasre Hrvatskoooooooooooooooo

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

'S-Gravenhage (the Hague), Netherlands Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Jamaica woman brings attention to rapes targeti... May 19 stevencrump 2
News Macedonia factfile May 15 CANADEZOS 1
News V-E Day 2015 observed May 9 Hue 5
News King's Day: Holland turns into a sea of orange May 7 test 1
News 'No room' for gays in Kenya, says deputy president May 5 Wall 9
News Breaking one of Canada's best kept secrets: MMIW Apr 26 Eric 1
News Croatian Serb rebel in Belgrade on release for ... Apr '15 The Clarifier 2
More from around the web