Randall Cobb Injury: Green Bay Packer...

Randall Cobb Injury: Green Bay Packers WR has 'real chance' of playing

There are 24 comments on the NFLSpinZone story from Dec 26, 2013, titled Randall Cobb Injury: Green Bay Packers WR has 'real chance' of playing. In it, NFLSpinZone reports that:

Green Bay Packers wide receiver Randall Cobb runs away from Washington Redskins linebacker Perry Riley and safety Brandon Meriweather for a touchdown in the first quarter at Lambeau Field.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NFLSpinZone.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1 Dec 26, 2013
I don't get it. Where are all of the so-called Packer fans whining about how the Packers should sit Randall Cobb because he MIGHT get reinjured? ROFLMAO I've heard a bunch of losers declare the season a loss already. So why should Cobb play? In fact, why should anybody play?
eric

Verona, WI

#2 Dec 26, 2013
Whats with the ROFLMAO? Are you trying to tell uss that there is actually 1 moron that actually thinks your lame attempt at humor is actually funny?
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#3 Dec 26, 2013
actually, I don't think it is funny for so many Packer fans to think, talk and act like losers. However, it IS funny that they make their stupidity and hypocrisy sooooo obvious by saying such stupid things about one player but not any others.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#4 Dec 26, 2013
Obviously, I WAS RIGHT! Aaron was already medically cleared. Aaron is playing on Sunday.
Packer Backer WichitaKs

Wichita, KS

#5 Dec 26, 2013
GBPfan wrote:
Obviously, I WAS RIGHT! Aaron was already medically cleared. Aaron is playing on Sunday.
You are just a grumpy, negative person all the time. Any Packer fan with any common sense knows that players will return when medically cleared and physically capable of playing. As I am sure you every injury is different and the healing time is different. Cobb practiced today and will be evaluated tomorrow to see if he is available for Sunday. It's called "due diligence" which I am quite sure every NFL team does before letting an injured player return. Your conspiracy theory by the Packers on the Rodgers' injury was thwarted today because they went through the process, did their due diligence and waited on medical clearance just as they will do on Cobb and any injured player. It is really pretty simple.
Packer Backer WichitaKs

Wichita, KS

#6 Dec 26, 2013
GBPfan wrote:
I don't get it. Where are all of the so-called Packer fans whining about how the Packers should sit Randall Cobb because he MIGHT get reinjured? ROFLMAO I've heard a bunch of losers declare the season a loss already. So why should Cobb play? In fact, why should anybody play?
As far as us so-called Packer fans are concerned we seem to forget just how much of righteous Packer fan you are. All of the 6-8 Packer fans I watch the games agreed that no player should play unless medically cleared regardless of the situation. Matthews played with a broken thumb, Lacy with a bum ankle and on and on. I imagine the were cleared by the medical staff to do so. None of us fully understands the extent of Rodgers shoulder injury. Obviously, the medical staff thought that his collarbone was not healed enough to play until today. Pretty simple, huh? We all know there is a chance that players may reinjure their old injuries. Hell, they play in the most injury prone game in all of sports. We get that. No team should put a player at risk if not cleared by medical staff that their current injury has healed sufficiently.
eric

Verona, WI

#7 Dec 26, 2013
GBPfan wrote:
I don't get it. Where are all of the so-called Packer fans whining about how the Packers should sit Randall Cobb because he MIGHT get reinjured? ROFLMAO I've heard a bunch of losers declare the season a loss already. So why should Cobb play? In fact, why should anybody play?
So called Packer fans,while you were spewing a red. conspiracy theory and mentioning how you were prouder of the Vikings organization because at least they wanted to win and accusing Packer management of not wanting to win.real nice!
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#8 Dec 27, 2013
Packer Backer WichitaKs wrote:
<quoted text>You are just a grumpy, negative person all the time. Any Packer fan with any common sense knows that players will return when medically cleared and physically capable of playing. As I am sure you every injury is different and the healing time is different. Cobb practiced today and will be evaluated tomorrow to see if he is available for Sunday. It's called "due diligence" which I am quite sure every NFL team does before letting an injured player return. Your conspiracy theory by the Packers on the Rodgers' injury was thwarted today because they went through the process, did their due diligence and waited on medical clearance just as they will do on Cobb and any injured player. It is really pretty simple.
Read it and weep MORON:''Aaron wants to play, has wanted to play for the last couple of weeks. He fully accepts, understands everything going on with his injury, so this is really a decision for Ted Thompson and I representing the organization. That's how it works.''

It means the same today that it meant when McCarthy first said it: It means Aaron had been medically cleared. ROFLMAO It was no "conspiracy theory" and I never said it was. I simply stated a FACT! Why are you upset that Aaron had been medically cleared?

GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#9 Dec 27, 2013
Aaron Rodgers is playing! I know how much that upsets some people. But trying to win is the right decision.

I would have thought it would ONLY be Bear fans upset about Aaron playing, but apparently some Packer fans are too! Who woulda thunk?
Packer Backer WichitaKs

Wichita, KS

#10 Dec 27, 2013
GBPfan wrote:
<quoted text>
Read it and weep MORON:''Aaron wants to play, has wanted to play for the last couple of weeks. He fully accepts, understands everything going on with his injury, so this is really a decision for Ted Thompson and I representing the organization. That's how it works.''
It means the same today that it meant when McCarthy first said it: It means Aaron had been medically cleared. ROFLMAO It was no "conspiracy theory" and I never said it was. I simply stated a FACT! Why are you upset that Aaron had been medically cleared?
I am glad Rodgers is playing like I'm sure every Packer fan is. Sure, Rodgers wanted to play the last couple of weeks. I get that. But, nowhere in that statement does it say he was "medically cleared". You have read into and twisted it around to make it what YOU wanted. I stand by the organization and the process they went through to allow Rodgers to play against the Bears. I trust they handled it the only way they should have, period. You go on believing he was cleared several weeks ago. Apparently, to you, all the media and the organization itself, was wrong. That's your opinion.
eric

Verona, WI

#11 Dec 27, 2013
Aaron wanted to play does not mean he wanted to play but was Cleared,So what part of Mike was waiting for medical reports did you not understand
eric

Verona, WI

#12 Dec 27, 2013
GBPfan wrote:
Aaron Rodgers is playing! I know how much that upsets some people. But trying to win is the right decision.
I would have thought it would ONLY be Bear fans upset about Aaron playing, but apparently some Packer fans are too! Who woulda thunk?
Dont be an arrogant Prick and put words in others mouths or spew red. bs opinions to cover your ass that you lied about the organization,Aaron wanted to play the past few weeks,well, any athlete would want to and it obviously was early,What part of Mc. saying he wanted to announce it on Tuesday but the medical info wasnt available? REPEAT THE MEDICAL INFO WAS NOT AVAILABLE..translation for the stupid..You were WRONG,he was not cleared,So, you can play the I.A.P. shit all you want but you were wrong and you got nailed on it,So in typical fashion,start twisting meanigs ect to stroke the huge ego..By the way,,Why is it when someone critsizes the org or a player,you call them all sorts of names but you call them liars ect but act like holier then thou Packer fan,,get over yourself and be a man for once,you got nailed,you were wrong,,deal with it.
Packer Backer WichitaKs

Wichita, KS

#13 Dec 27, 2013
eric wrote:
<quoted text> Dont be an arrogant Prick and put words in others mouths or spew red. bs opinions to cover your ass that you lied about the organization,Aaron wanted to play the past few weeks,well, any athlete would want to and it obviously was early,What part of Mc. saying he wanted to announce it on Tuesday but the medical info wasnt available? REPEAT THE MEDICAL INFO WAS NOT AVAILABLE..translation for the stupid..You were WRONG,he was not cleared,So, you can play the I.A.P. shit all you want but you were wrong and you got nailed on it,So in typical fashion,start twisting meanigs ect to stroke the huge ego..By the way,,Why is it when someone critsizes the org or a player,you call them all sorts of names but you call them liars ect but act like holier then thou Packer fan,,get over yourself and be a man for once,you got nailed,you were wrong,,deal with it.
Hit the nail right on the head Eric, couldn't agree more with what you just said.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#14 Dec 27, 2013
Packer Backer WichitaKs wrote:
<quoted text>I am glad Rodgers is playing like I'm sure every Packer fan is. Sure, Rodgers wanted to play the last couple of weeks. I get that. But, nowhere in that statement does it say he was "medically cleared". You have read into and twisted it around to make it what YOU wanted. I stand by the organization and the process they went through to allow Rodgers to play against the Bears. I trust they handled it the only way they should have, period. You go on believing he was cleared several weeks ago. Apparently, to you, all the media and the organization itself, was wrong. That's your opinion.
If it makes you morons happy to pretend that Aaron had not been medically cleared when McCarthy said: "'Aaron wants to play, has wanted to play for the last couple of weeks. He fully accepts, understands everything going on with his injury, so this is really a decision for Ted Thompson and I representing the organization. That's how it works.'' Then go ahead and tell yourselves that. I don't care if you take pleasure by keeping yourself bathed in ignorance. And the organization did handle it the right way. That is proved by the fact that Aaron is playing Sunday.

BTW we don't know exactly when Aaron was medically cleared. The only thing we know for sure is that it was before McCarthy made his statement. McCarthy and the Packers deceived the fans for a short period of time, at a minimum. Supposedly it was to inform the team first. I will accept McCarthy at his word that he lied for that reason. However, I don't agree with the lies and deception no matter what excuse he gives. He simply should have told the team sooner and then that would have eliminated the excuse he used to lie to everyone. Don't get mad at me simply because I was able to see through the deception and YOU were not!
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#15 Dec 27, 2013
eric wrote:
<quoted text> Dont be an arrogant Prick and put words in others mouths or spew red. bs opinions to cover your ass that you lied about the organization,Aaron wanted to play the past few weeks,well, any athlete would want to and it obviously was early,What part of Mc. saying he wanted to announce it on Tuesday but the medical info wasnt available? REPEAT THE MEDICAL INFO WAS NOT AVAILABLE..translation for the stupid..You were WRONG,he was not cleared,So, you can play the I.A.P. shit all you want but you were wrong and you got nailed on it,So in typical fashion,start twisting meanigs ect to stroke the huge ego..By the way,,Why is it when someone critsizes the org or a player,you call them all sorts of names but you call them liars ect but act like holier then thou Packer fan,,get over yourself and be a man for once,you got nailed,you were wrong,,deal with it.
Who is the arrogant prick? The person that was right? The person that saw through the lies? Or the jerks that insisted that Aaron had not been medically cleared and that still insisted that Aaron had not been medically cleared even though it's obvious he had been? You still are insisting he had not been cleared. You are a jerk and a moron! Grow up! Learn to admit when you are wrong.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#16 Dec 27, 2013
Morons, how many times will you need to read McCarthy's comment until you understand that Aaron was medically cleared when he said it?

''Aaron wants to play, has wanted to play for the last couple of weeks. He fully accepts, understands everything going on with his injury, so this is really a decision for Ted Thompson and I representing the organization. That's how it works.''

That IS how it works AFTER Rodgers is medically cleared and that IS how it worked AFTER Rodgers was cleared! ROFLMAO Will it help more if you idiots read it another dozen times?

eric

Verona, WI

#17 Dec 27, 2013
GBPfan wrote:
<quoted text>
Who is the arrogant prick? The person that was right? The person that saw through the lies? Or the jerks that insisted that Aaron had not been medically cleared and that still insisted that Aaron had not been medically cleared even though it's obvious he had been? You still are insisting he had not been cleared. You are a jerk and a moron! Grow up! Learn to admit when you are wrong.
Who is the Arrogant Prick, I showed you where Mike McCarthy stated he couldnt announce anything until he got the Medical Info which he did not get on Tuesday ( which is why he couldnt announce anything) So, he announced it on Thursday as thats the day he got the Med. Info ( 1st thing when he got there) so with that PROOF he was not cleared,you still insist on calling us morons ( when we proved you wrong),so who is the arrogant prick,,look in the mirror and you should get a good look at him.Who is the arrogant Prick? well,maybe the one who bashes Fellow Packer fans for having an opinon about the Packers you may not agree with ( our predictions about TT andMM,,,when Favre got traded ect__) and you bash,name call ,accuse others of not being Packer fans and TT lovers,YET, you accuse the Packers falsly and a flat out lie of not wanting to win and being prouder of the Vikings ( as you would be on anyone else for much less and have been) BUT yet change words,subjects and namecall and treat folks like shit and act like an arrogant Prick and try to change the subject as to cover the fact you were exposed and nailed.Again,who is the arrogant prick,look in the mirror once again and take a good look
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#18 Dec 27, 2013
eric you can believe anything you want to believe. I don't care. I KNOW what McCarthy said:''Aaron wants to play, has wanted to play for the last couple of weeks. He fully accepts, understands everything going on with his injury, so this is really a decision for Ted Thompson and I representing the organization. That's how it works.'' He obviously knew that Aaron had already been medically cleared at that point. If it makes you feel better to convince yourself that McCarthy didn't know when he said that, I don't care. I KNOW that I was right. And I know that Aaron is playing Sunday! If you want to keep on reminding me that I was right while you argue stupid little points that mean nothing go ahead.

BTW moron why do you keep mentioning what was known on Tuesday? Check the first comment here. It was made YESTERDAY!
eric

Verona, WI

#19 Dec 27, 2013
Tuesday was the day he ( McCarthy) wanted to make an announcement but he needed to see the Medical Info and since he didnt get it on Tuesday and Christmas was Wednesday,they announced it on Thursday ( Yesterday),of course if you werent such an,arrogant Prick and actually listened to facts,you would have known that.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#20 Dec 27, 2013
Wrong moron! Didn't you see or read about the Press Conference?

"We're preparing for the Chicago Bears with Aaron Rodgers as our starting quarterback," coach Mike McCarthy said at his news conference Thursday afternoon.

"He's been getting ready for this moment, and the moment's here."

McCarthy said the decision was made Tuesday, but it was held secret until he announced to the team at 8:05 a.m. Thursday that Rodgers would start. McCarthy said it was business as usual for his team.

Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/23732895 ...

THE DECISION WAS MADE TUESDAY!

When are you going to pretend to be an adult and admit you are wrong? ROFLMA

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Washington Redskins Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Listen Washington fans Jan '16 Lil red lost 1
News NFL: Bailey's field goal lifts Cowboys against ... (Dec '15) Dec '15 Fart news 3
News Redskins could play consecutive '16 games in Lo... (Nov '15) Nov '15 Sam Testicles 8
News Turns out the NFC East isn't very good (Oct '15) Oct '15 Fart news 4
News No Moral Victory Monday at Redskins Park (Oct '15) Oct '15 Fart news 2
News Cornerback David Amerson finds aa (Oct '15) Oct '15 Farts seafood 1
News Defiant Chip Kelly isn't changing anything desp... (Oct '15) Oct '15 Farts chips 1
More from around the web