Greg Jennings Could Still Return to Green Bay Packers

Mar 12, 2013 Full story: Rant Sports 91

As we near the end of the first day of NFL free agency, the top wide receiver left on the board is Greg Jennings .

Full Story
GBPmies

Finland

#61 Mar 17, 2013
Come one, come all!!!!
Step right up and see The amazing human pretzel!!!

ezg has his foot in his mouth while his head is up his azzzzzz!!!

Greg Jennings was offer 8 million.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/jennin... (see ezg I have a link, you should try it someday)
viking nation

Madera, CA

#62 Mar 17, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
Come one, come all!!!!
Step right up and see The amazing human pretzel!!!
ezg has his foot in his mouth while his head is up his azzzzzz!!!
Greg Jennings was offer 8 million.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/jennin... (see ezg I have a link, you should try it someday)
The thing is What news article is right! mine that is NFL.com or yours that is JSonline lol my self I will take the word of NFL.com . I don't know why your trying to prove me wrong, When all I did was show you what NFL.com was saying, how much the packers offer to jennings was. I didnt make it up You sound to me like your not all there. let it go. Wow
viking nation

Madera, CA

#63 Mar 17, 2013
viking nation

Madera, CA

#64 Mar 17, 2013
Thats the offer on NFL.com
GBPmies

Finland

#65 Mar 17, 2013
viking nation wrote:
<quoted text>The thing is What news article is right! mine that is NFL.com or yours that is JSonline lol my self I will take the word of NFL.com .
This is not NFL.com vs JSonline

NFL.com used the JSoline article too. If it was not a creditable source they wouldn't use it, neither would other major sports news sites. LOSER!
http://www.nfl.com/news/around-the-league...

Your link is from the 13th, today is the 17th. Your link says and I quote "“The Green Bay Packers offered wide receiver Greg Jennings about $10 million per year "a while ago,"

You link says -----A WHILE AGO!---- HELLO!!!!– AWHILE AGO---- DO YOU COPY? I repeat AWHILE AGO!

That is not this week. Like every single report says about the 10 million was from last year, not this year.

JSoline gave the info, they follow the Packers news for living, it is their job and a trusted site by all sports news sites.

Do us a favor and go play in traffic!

“Expect No Mercy”

Since: Jun 09

Pensacola, FL

#66 Mar 17, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
<quoted text>
This is not NFL.com vs JSonline
NFL.com used the JSoline article too. If it was not a creditable source they wouldn't use it, neither would other major sports news sites. LOSER!
http://www.nfl.com/news/around-the-league...
Your link is from the 13th, today is the 17th. Your link says and I quote "“The Green Bay Packers offered wide receiver Greg Jennings about $10 million per year "a while ago,"
You link says -----A WHILE AGO!---- HELLO!!!!– AWHILE AGO---- DO YOU COPY? I repeat AWHILE AGO!
That is not this week. Like every single report says about the 10 million was from last year, not this year.
JSoline gave the info, they follow the Packers news for living, it is their job and a trusted site by all sports news sites.
Do us a favor and go play in traffic!
LOL! I see you are still terrorizing VN or whoever he is, and completely ignoring the foolish posts of avant. Keep up the good work. By the way...looking forward to the RIVALRY that has grown between the Pack and the Vikes over the years.
GBPmies

Finland

#67 Mar 17, 2013
ProCynic wrote:
<quoted text>LOL! I see you are still terrorizing VN or whoever he is, and completely ignoring the foolish posts of avant. Keep up the good work. By the way...looking forward to the RIVALRY that has grown between the Pack and the Vikes over the years.
The Vikings have been improving quicker than I thought they would. Speilman is doing a great job now that he has full control. That will make the future of the NFC North more interesting. They have some talent and sh** load of draft picks coming in to replace some of thier aging vets.

VN=ezg, I have had the same type of pointless arguments over and over, I can't help myself I guess, I am not even sure avant is a Vikings fan, I think he is an Avant fan. He will cheer for the Packers if helps him prove he was right about something. Either way both are delusional window lickers IMO!

Good luck and all the best!
eric

Marshfield, WI

#68 Mar 17, 2013
Actually I was reading where last year GB offered over 10M and Jennings was looking for nearly 15M.
It also says Clearly in English,Jennings turned down GBs 8M offer to sign with Minn.
Sources also said Minn. paid a bit more then they wanted to but they paid Jennings 2.5M LESS then what they would have paid Harvin
viking nation

Madera, CA

#69 Mar 17, 2013
eric wrote:
Actually I was reading where last year GB offered over 10M and Jennings was looking for nearly 15M.
It also says Clearly in English,Jennings turned down GBs 8M offer to sign with Minn.
Sources also said Minn. paid a bit more then they wanted to but they paid Jennings 2.5M LESS then what they would have paid Harvin
Thats right & now you see new reports once jennings has signed But NF.com did show that the Packers made a offer of 10 million. Arguing on the internet is annoying enough without people shouting fallacy all the time. The guy is to much.
GBPmies

Finland

#70 Mar 18, 2013
viking nation wrote:
<quoted text>Thats right & now you see new reports once jennings has signed But NF.com did show that the Packers made a offer of 10 million. Arguing on the internet is annoying enough without people shouting fallacy all the time. The guy is to much.
One last time...

Eric just said the offer was 10 million LASY YEAR! Now you agree it was LAST YEAR.

I agree the Packers offered 10 million LAST YEAR, why would I not it is written plain as day. But nothing is writen that they offered 10 million THIS YEAR before he signed with the Vikings like you said the Packers did.

All of these links say Packers offered 8 million. NFL, ESPN, NBC, CBS. ALL OF THEM!

NFL.com ---“the Packers proposed a deal that averaged $8 million per year. McGinn added the New England Patriots were willing to put up $6 million per year”
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100000015142...

ESPN --- Kevin Siefert-“several people I trust said it averaged $8 million per season.”
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/54...

NBC’s Pro Football Talk “Jennings rejected (per McGinn) a reduced offer of $8 million per year from the Packers, and a $6 million annual flier from the Patriots.”
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/...

CBS Sports –“Report: Packers offered Greg Jennings $8 million a season”
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-foot...

I am done unless you have a link that clearly states Jennings was offered 10 million last week. I have all the links I need above that state 8 million was the offer last week.

The end!

“Lying scumbags need not apply”

Since: Jan 08

Yorktown, VA

#71 Mar 18, 2013
ezg/viking nation is a liar so why do you expect him to believe any of your sources.

The truth is he is a punk kid living at home with no social skills, no football knowledge and has apparently failed freshman English several times given his crappy grammer.

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#72 Mar 18, 2013
Stubby wrote:
ezg/viking nation is a liar so why do you expect him to believe any of your sources.
The truth is he is a punk kid living at home with no social skills, no football knowledge and has apparently failed freshman English several times given his crappy grammer.
Why do you care so much who people talk to? You guys have got your own site with people you only agree with. Don't worry about topix and who talks to who.
viking nation

Madera, CA

#73 Mar 18, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
<quoted text>
One last time...
Eric just said the offer was 10 million LASY YEAR! Now you agree it was LAST YEAR.
I agree the Packers offered 10 million LAST YEAR, why would I not it is written plain as day. But nothing is writen that they offered 10 million THIS YEAR before he signed with the Vikings like you said the Packers did.
All of these links say Packers offered 8 million. NFL, ESPN, NBC, CBS. ALL OF THEM!
NFL.com ---“the Packers proposed a deal that averaged $8 million per year. McGinn added the New England Patriots were willing to put up $6 million per year”
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100000015142...
ESPN --- Kevin Siefert-“several people I trust said it averaged $8 million per season.”
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/54...
NBC’s Pro Football Talk “Jennings rejected (per McGinn) a reduced offer of $8 million per year from the Packers, and a $6 million annual flier from the Patriots.”
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/...
CBS Sports –“Report: Packers offered Greg Jennings $8 million a season”
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-foot...
I am done unless you have a link that clearly states Jennings was offered 10 million last week. I have all the links I need above that state 8 million was the offer last week.
The end!
Mine was the first report of the packers offer, sure now you see others. what does it matter now?? we are both right here there is no one thats wrong.
viking nation

Madera, CA

#74 Mar 18, 2013
Do you ever talk about your Team & your teams needs or what they are doing in free agency? I hear they are interested in ex Giant RB Ahmad Bradshaw. I myself would go after Dallas Cowboys RB Felix Jones. Jones is a little more elusive then Bradshaw.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#75 Mar 18, 2013
Bradshaw is a banger who would come cheaper and prob be as effective,although im not holding my breath on either,but, at least,Ted brought in Steven Jackson, the kid from KC,now Bradshaw ( at least interest in him) SO its clear TT is thinking about running backs,which is a good thing
KEY THING! We need Bulaga to survive at LT so Barclay can remain at RT,he was much better run blocker then Bulaga and Bulaga is a much better pass blocker
OR
Datko at RT instead of Barclay but Bulaga must survive succesfully at LT ( unless Sherrod proves hes 100%) and before he got hurt,he didnt play that well at the start,infact, he was pretty much benched until slumps and whatever.Sherrod was getting better when he suffered that horrific injury,IF hes 100%( HUGE IF) then Bulaga,Barclay or Datko at RT..GB ( coach Mc no doubt would choose Bulaga) id take Barclay over Bulaga ( again better run blocker) but maybe Datko could out block both for all we know.
viking nation

Madera, CA

#76 Mar 18, 2013
True Brsdshaw is a banger if thats what the Packers are looking for. I always thought the packers was more of a elusive team & not the banger & thats why I suggesed Jones. True Bulaga needs to improve at LT & like you said he isnt bad at pass blocking. The packers can keep Bulaga at LT even if he is weak at run blocking & bring in LG to help push the defense. im not sure if its a need there or how good your LG is in green bay but you got to have more then the LT that can run block. From games I seen the line didnt run block near as good as their pass blocking so maybe bringing in a LG to help out on the side would be a good idea.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#77 Mar 18, 2013
Packers need help at the Center spot.I think Bulaga can handle LT..GB running game improved greatly after Bulaga left RT and Barclay took over and actually Mc called more screens ect with Harris after Barclay took over.GB needs that short yardage banger.GB had to many 4th quarter drives where GB had a lead with a few minutes left and for some stupid reason,Mc would call running plays instead of letting a HOFer ( qb AR) take over and put the game away,Coach Mc wants that running game to kill the clock and to many times GB would get that 1st down or 2 but not the game clincher,well,Bradshaw maybe that Banger to make it happen! Of course RB can be found around the draft,so at least TT is looking for one which is a good sign.
GBPmies

Finland

#78 Mar 18, 2013
viking nation wrote:
<quoted text> Mine was the first report of the packers offer, sure now you see others. what does it matter now?? we are both right here there is no one thats wrong.
Well you are half right, which means you are wrong again.
Why does it matter? Because, you said I was wrong. Because you were running your mouth off like an azz and didn't know what you were talking about. It matters because you cannot admit you were wrong even after being proved wrong you just kept argueing, just like every post you had under ezg.
Yes yours was the first report of the Packers offer of 10 million --- NOW PAY ATTENTION --- but it was from last year, NOT this year like I said!!!
1. You argued it was 10 million and the offer was still on the table this year and he turned it down to sign with the Vikings for less.
2. You argued against my links proving to you that 10 million was last years offer and that it was 8 million offered this year
3. Only now after all the links I gave do you agree with me. The only right thing you have done.
Why do have a hard time admitting you were wrong?
Next time just pay attention to what the articles say and not what you want to hear.

“Lying scumbags need not apply”

Since: Jan 08

Yorktown, VA

#79 Mar 18, 2013
Avant wrote:
<quoted text>Why do you care so much who people talk to? You guys have got your own site with people you only agree with. Don't worry about topix and who talks to who.
You are a veteran. Why do you talk with someone who lied about military service and military honors. He claimed to have won the Medal of Honor. You know I don't have much respect for your football opinions but I do have respect for your stint in the Air Force. Did you not absorb any military values like honor or integrity. ezg/viking nation has none of those qualities and should be regarded like something foul that you stepped in and have to scrape off your shoe.

“Lying scumbags need not apply”

Since: Jan 08

Yorktown, VA

#80 Mar 18, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
<quoted text>
Well you are half right, which means you are wrong again.
.......
Why do have a hard time admitting you were wrong?
Next time just pay attention to what the articles say and not what you want to hear.
Admit is was wrong? He can't even admit he is the lying stolen valor scumbag ezg. He lives in a delusional world filled with his own lies.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minnesota Vikings Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Get On The Vikings Bandwagon (Jun '14) 1 hr Magnum Man II 51
Ben Tate is history 8 hr Magnum Man II 1
Culpepper/Moss era 8 hr Magnum Man II 6
Merry Christmas 20 hr viking nation 1
Merry Christmas Wed Avant 1
who to cut and who to keep Wed eric 7
6 viking nation has Won NFL.com Fantasy Footbal... Wed Stubby 12
More from around the web