Greg Jennings Could Still Return to Green Bay Packers

Mar 12, 2013 Full story: Rant Sports 91

As we near the end of the first day of NFL free agency, the top wide receiver left on the board is Greg Jennings .

Full Story
First Prev
of 5
Next Last
Laughing Bear Fan

Denver, CO

#1 Mar 13, 2013
because he found out he has little worth on the FA market
viking nation

Madera, CA

#2 Mar 13, 2013
I would think Jennings wouldn't want to go back to to the Packers after all he & his sister said about Aaron & the team.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#3 Mar 13, 2013
IF he does come back to GB I believe some of it is having Rodgers as his qb instead of Ponder.He did mention qb is important( i read that part).
His sister wanted him to go to South Beach,well,Miami signed a WR so that door closed real quick.
I dont think Jennings alone is what he once was ( still very good but,,,) its the combo of having Jones,Cobb or Nelson ( any combo of the 2 of 3) and the fact Rodgers is his qb that makes him so good, and he doesnt or wouldnt have that much of a luxury in Minn.Sure he has AP and Kyle Rudolph but no other WR ( obviously Minn with draft one and may sign one in FA) but its the devil you know over the devil you dont in this case
GBPmies

Finland

#4 Mar 13, 2013
viking nation wrote:
I would think Jennings wouldn't want to go back to to the Packers after all he & his sister said about Aaron & the team.
What did Jennings say bad about the Packers? I know his sister got upset about something but that is his sister. Jennings hasn't burned any bridges or said anything bad about the Pack that I am aware off. I and I am aware of most things Packer related. Send me some quotes and links if you have anything 'real' to offer.
viking nation

Madera, CA

#5 Mar 13, 2013
Did you hear Jennings say he doesnt know where his sister got that from? I didn't, She didnt just make it all up & from I hear she dont look at the games so where did she get it from. I mean two & two is 4. I guess im taking it for granite that Jennings told her.
GBPmies

Finland

#6 Mar 14, 2013
viking nation wrote:
Did you hear Jennings say he doesnt know where his sister got that from? I didn't, She didnt just make it all up & from I hear she dont look at the games so where did she get it from. I mean two & two is 4. I guess im taking it for granite that Jennings told her.
Well no,“taking it for granted” means something else all together, YOU ARE ASSUMING Jennings told her bad things. The truth is you made up the fact Jennings has been saying bad things about the Packers. Just simply say you have no idea what you are talking about and you are assuming based on nothing. Or else give me some facts not your delusional opinions.

For all you know (which in this case is jacksh**) it could have been Jennings uncle Skippy that told her bad things about the Pack.
Plus you wrote “from I hear she don’t look at the games “. How the hell would you know that? Com’on! When she went off on twitter it was DURING the game, talking about the game, while WATCHING the game! Do some research.

Once again you are just making stuff up just like your comment about Winfield not 'excepting' a pay cut before his release, before he was cut. It was clearly stated he was not offered a pay cut and was bilnd sided by the move. If a player is asked to take a pay cut, and refuses too it wouldn't be a suprise they then get cut!

Maybe you just like to believe what you want to and ignore any facts or known truths to make you feel better about something. Sure everyone makes mistakes and that is fine but it seems you like to make stuff up like that little POS ezg.

“Lying scumbags need not apply”

Since: Jan 08

Yorktown, VA

#7 Mar 14, 2013
viking nation is the scumbag who used to call himself ezg357 who claimed false military service and to have won a Purple Heart and Medal of Honor. He is a stolen valor lying scumbag.
GBPmies

Finland

#8 Mar 14, 2013
I just heard Jennings is interveiwing in MN today. Maybe he signs with the Vikings today... I know they talked about money already so maybe something is in place or he is trying drive up the Packers... interesting stuff!
Packluv1

Lake In The Hills, IL

#9 Mar 14, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
<quoted text>
What did Jennings say bad about the Packers? I know his sister got upset about something but that is his sister. Jennings hasn't burned any bridges or said anything bad about the Pack that I am aware off. I and I am aware of most things Packer related. Send me some quotes and links if you have anything 'real' to offer.
he said that when he does the lamebeau leap fans(male) are grabbing his junk. But I guess it's part of the tradition and nobody in greenbay is upset that he complained about it.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#10 Mar 14, 2013
I read Jennings and the Vikes met on Wednesday but Jennings was asking for more money then what the Vikings were willing to pay,so Minn. ended the nego. but obvioiusly something is up,if they are meeting again.
Quite possible Jennings overated his value to start with,OR after trading Harvin,Minn. decided its better to go with a player you know,rather then maybe draft one.I thing is for sure,TT ( going by past actions) has a number and wont go past it,SO if Jennings didnt want to play in Minn but is using them to hike the price,well, he just may be stuck there as TT ( again,going on his past) wont play that game.OF Course if Jennings didnt mind playing in Minn,well, then he gets the best of both worlds,meaning he plays where he will enjoy playing and hes getting paid.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#11 Mar 14, 2013
If its between Steven Jackson or Greg Jennings,id go with Jackson.
We have Randall Cobb,James Jones, Jordy Nelson,Jeremy Boykins ( young kid,who has a nice future ahead of him hopefully) and TT finds WRS in the draft as proven.
GB needs to run better!
THE only problem i can see is ( besides the obvious,injuries)
JaMichael Finley and his camp stating the Packers are trying to pull a quick one.. nad Finley is in limbo SO if GB signs GJ,Finley is gone ( and i would think Finley knows this and the TE market dried up pretty much) or Finley would be asked to take a paycut or would ask,as he would still make more cash in GB then in the open market now.BUT, we know his act and he can end up being pissed enough to become a distraction.
IF they sign Jackson,Finley prob. stays for his 8.5M,they still have the cash to sign a few biggies within the team but Finley is prob gone after the season..We know GB is a pass first team,but, if Don Barclay run blocks like he did the final weeks last year and very well may be better with some experience and throw in Steven Jackson,GB might become that running and screen team,,Teams like Chicago and Minn and Det for that matter ( all great run defenses) will have to respect GB running game and imagine Rodgers and the remaining WR with open field now that Minn or Chi are respecting the run,you think Rodgers put up numbers before?
viking nation

Madera, CA

#12 Mar 14, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
<quoted text>
Well no,“taking it for granted” means something else all together, YOU ARE Jennings told her bad things. The truth is you made up the fact Jennings has been saying bad things about the Packers. Just simply say you have no idea what you are talking about and you are assuming based on nothing. Or else give me some facts not your delusional opinions.
For all you know (which in this case is jacksh**) it could have been Jennings uncle Skippy that told her bad things about the Pack.
Plus you wrote “from I hear she don’t look at the games “. How the hell would you know that? Com’on! When she went off on twitter it was DURING the game, talking about the game, while WATCHING the game! Do some research.
Once again you are just making stuff up just like your comment about Winfield not 'excepting' a pay cut before his release, before he was cut. It was clearly stated he was not offered a pay cut and was bilnd sided by the move. If a player is asked to take a pay cut, and refuses too it wouldn't be a suprise they then get cut!
Maybe you just like to believe what you want to and ignore any facts or known truths to make you feel better about something. Sure everyone makes mistakes and that is fine but it seems you like to make stuff up like that little POS ezg.
I didnt make up anything & Just as I didnt make up anything about Winfield I posted the page that shows that the Vikings made winfield a offer for a pay cut & he turned it down. Your talking off the top of your head. I did show you the facts on winfield look up my post. & taking it for "granted" means one assumes. I took it for "granted" you would be there meaning I assume you would be. Your right about the spelling. it isnt granite I was wrong but my statement wasnt wrong.
viking nation

Madera, CA

#13 Mar 14, 2013
Stubby I am going to avoid your negative energy. your a guy that is always negative & when you do talk about football you have no stats to back up your facts.
GBPmies

Finland

#14 Mar 14, 2013
viking nation wrote:
<quoted text>I didnt make up anything & Just as I didnt make up anything about Winfield I posted the page that shows that the Vikings made winfield a offer for a pay cut & he turned it down. Your talking off the top of your head. I did show you the facts on winfield look up my post. & taking it for "granted" means one assumes. I took it for "granted" you would be there meaning I assume you would be. Your right about the spelling. it isnt granite I was wrong but my statement wasnt wrong.
I looked at your post and link you gave about Winfield, go look at my reply. At the bottom of your link it states in the ‘Author Notes’ that there are conflicting reports, and the author doesn't know the truth. Check the bottom of the page. So you got your “facts” and info from someone that has admitted they don't know the truth or what they are talking about! That means you don't know the truth or what you are talking about!

You have no knowledge or facts about Jennings saying anything bad about the Packers. But you said he did. So you made that up!

This is the definition of “to take for granted"
--to expect someone or something to be always available to serve in some way without thanks or recognition; to value someone or something too lightly--
That phase makes no sense in your post and you do not understand the phrase.

Are you ezg? I have had a million mind numbing conversations just like this with that little loser. If not there must be something in the water in your guys city....
viking nation

Madera, CA

#15 Mar 14, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
<quoted text>
I looked at your post and link you gave about Winfield, go look at my reply. At the bottom of your link it states in the ‘Author Notes’ that there are conflicting reports, and the author doesn't know the truth. Check the bottom of the page. So you got your “facts” and info from someone that has admitted they don't know the truth or what they are talking about! That means you don't know the truth or what you are talking about!
You have no knowledge or facts about Jennings saying anything bad about the Packers. But you said he did. So you made that up!
This is the definition of “to take for granted"
--to expect someone or something to be always available to serve in some way without thanks or recognition; to value someone or something too lightly--
That phase makes no sense in your post and you do not understand the phrase.
Are you ezg? I have had a million mind numbing conversations just like this with that little loser. If not there must be something in the water in your guys city....
I am only telling you I didnt make it up like you said I did. It is something I was reading. be it right or not The thing is I didnt make it up .
viking nation

Madera, CA

#16 Mar 14, 2013
Jennings didnt deny not telling his his sister anyting. he said he was disappointed her thoughts put him in a awkward situation. The page also goes on to says It certainly isn’t outside the realm of possibility that Jennings, upset with his contract status and disappointed that the team he’s played for since 2006 has shown no interest in striking a long-term deal( & has voiced his frustration to family members.)
viking nation

Madera, CA

#17 Mar 14, 2013
I am not saying I am right about anything I know im not. But I sure didnt make anything up like your saying. If you want to talk football I will & I will give my opinion. Sometimes its in faver of someones post you dont like & sometimes I am agants that same person other post Its no big deal.
GBPmies

Finland

#18 Mar 14, 2013
viking nation wrote:
<quoted text>I am only telling you I didnt make it up like you said I did. It is something I was reading. be it right or not The thing is I didnt make it up .
True, I give you the benefit of the doubt on the Winfield case, you were misinformed. The end of the article did say there are conflicting reports so obviously it is not a known fact.
GBPmies

Finland

#19 Mar 14, 2013
viking nation wrote:
Jennings didnt deny not telling his his sister anyting. he said he was disappointed her thoughts put him in a awkward situation. The page also goes on to says It certainly isn’t outside the realm of possibility that Jennings, upset with his contract status and disappointed that the team he’s played for since 2006 has shown no interest in striking a long-term deal( & has voiced his frustration to family members.)
The FACT is you have NO FACT that he did say something bad against the Packers. But stated he did based on your opinions. You jumped to a conclusion based on your own ideas. You have nothing that shows Jennings said anything bad. You can have your opinion but don't try and make it FACT. In the future be careful how you state things because you stated Jennings was saying things about the Packers, when you don't know if he did or did not. That is making things up.
GBPmies

Finland

#20 Mar 14, 2013
1. I read Jackson was using the Packers to drum up his price to ATL, and the Packers were aware of it.

2. Jennings staying with the Packers talk was probably the same thing to put his price higher for the Vikings.

3. Both of them have the same agent...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minnesota Vikings Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Merry Christmas 14 min Avant 1
who to cut and who to keep 59 min eric 7
6 viking nation has Won NFL.com Fantasy Footbal... 13 hr Stubby 12
Vikings at Dolphins 13 hr Stubby 49
Viking Nation Wins NFL.com Fantasy Football Cha... Tue Magnum Man II 3
Teddy, Vikings Right on Track Dec 22 Laughing Bear Fan 10
Running Backs Dec 20 Stubby 23
More from around the web