Ranking The NFC North: First Place, T...

Ranking The NFC North: First Place, The Green Bay Packers

There are 2136 comments on the SidelionReport story from Jun 1, 2013, titled Ranking The NFC North: First Place, The Green Bay Packers. In it, SidelionReport reports that:

The NFC North has been one of the most competitive division in the NFL for the last three seasons with each team registering at least one 10 win season over that time.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at SidelionReport.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1152 Sep 7, 2013
CHECK THIS OUT....ABC's Good Morning America, this morning introduced the segment on his plea, introduced Aaron Hernandez as former New England Patriot and future Hall of Famer......wait?...WHAT??? How stupid is that? Media sucks sometimes.....
Packer Backer WichitaKs

Wichita, KS

#1153 Sep 7, 2013
viking nation wrote:
<quoted text>lol OK lets see If I can say this right, "my bad" I said it wrong. I mean the Vikings won 7 years out of the last 10 years played the Lions have won 3 of the last 10 years played I hope I am clearer this time. I know a lot of time I'm not real clear. This year will be the eleventh year & I hope the Vikes will make it their 8th years of winning We all know how many games each year they play But that isn't what I trying to say I think I said it right this time If not let me know lol
Once again Ezg, clear as mud. I think you are trying to say that the Vikings have gone 2-0 against the Lions in 7 of the last 10 seasons. Just like your SOS argument of a couple seasons ago, you managed to screw up something that is simple to figure out.
Packer Backer WichitaKs

Wichita, KS

#1154 Sep 7, 2013
viking nation wrote:
http://lombardiave.com/2013/09 /06/jermichael-finley-green-ba y-packers-tight-end/?utm_sourc e=FanSided+Daily&utm_mediu m=email
It is time to "put up or shut up" for Finley. The guy has all the physical tools to be one of the best TE's in the NFL. He wants to be paid WR money. Don't know if he is a "flop", but he needs to catch the ball in tough situations. My gut feeling is that he will leave the Packers after this season.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1155 Sep 7, 2013
Packer Backer WichitaKs wrote:
<quoted text>It is time to "put up or shut up" for Finley. The guy has all the physical tools to be one of the best TE's in the NFL. He wants to be paid WR money. Don't know if he is a "flop", but he needs to catch the ball in tough situations. My gut feeling is that he will leave the Packers after this season.
I think that Finley needs compromising photos of Ted Thompson in order to stay.
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1156 Sep 7, 2013
As if I didn't have enough reason to root for Finley, he is my fantasy TE.

“Pillars of Creation....”

Since: Jan 11

Into this world we're thrown

#1157 Sep 7, 2013
GBPfan wrote:
As if I didn't have enough reason to root for Finley, he is my fantasy TE.
He's mine to. I need 7 touchdowns out of him Sunday, so I can keep up with my opponent for this week who had Manning for a QB..........
eric

Verona, WI

#1158 Sep 7, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
CHECK THIS OUT....ABC's Good Morning America, this morning introduced the segment on his plea, introduced Aaron Hernandez as former New England Patriot and future Hall of Famer......wait?...WHAT??? How stupid is that? Media sucks sometimes.....
Guess no one care if he is just plain Aaron Hernendez but HOF A.H. WOW right!!!!!!!!!
Good call,,how stupid is that! Media flat out sucks for sure!
eric

Verona, WI

#1159 Sep 7, 2013
Packer Backer WichitaKs wrote:
<quoted text>It is time to "put up or shut up" for Finley. The guy has all the physical tools to be one of the best TE's in the NFL. He wants to be paid WR money. Don't know if he is a "flop", but he needs to catch the ball in tough situations. My gut feeling is that he will leave the Packers after this season.
My gut tells me,he will have a contract type Career year and someone else will be stupid enough to pay him 12M.Although if Aaron Rodgers wants him around,they work well together ect, they must try to sign him..My fear is,if he does have a career year, then the BS about Finley hitting his potential,maturity ect all starts and if TT pays him the big bucks and he goes back to old Finley ways. Many FA to resign,so who knows if they have the money for him anyway even if they wanted to sign Finley,,( dont forget Aaron Rodgers and Clay Mathews eats 11M MORE in cap space next year as compared to this year)
GBPmies

Finland

#1160 Sep 7, 2013
Packer Backer WichitaKs wrote:
<quoted text>Once again Ezg, clear as mud. I think you are trying to say that the Vikings have gone 2-0 against the Lions in 7 of the last 10 seasons. Just like your SOS argument of a couple seasons ago, you managed to screw up something that is simple to figure out.
Yeah what you are saying is right and makes sense, unlike the stupid shit he tried to say. I guess it was his dyslexia getting in the way of rational thought again.
For the life of me I cannot understand why I or anyone has ever bothered to figure out what the fool is saying. He gets so worked up about being wrong and goes crazy with stupid shit single every day.

It is like an rtard with rabies!

Vikings against Lions W and L for last 10 yrs.
2003 W and W
2004 W and W
2005 W and W
2006 W and W
2007 L and W
2008 W and W
2009 W and W
2010 W and L
2011 L and L
2012 W and W

Maybe what the rtard wanted to say was the vikes have ‘swept’ the Lions in 7 of the last 10 years.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscor...

FUCK AN A MAN!!!!!!! How hard is it to say that?
viking nation

Madera, CA

#1161 Sep 7, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah what you are saying is right and makes sense, unlike the stupid shit he tried to say. I guess it was his dyslexia getting in the way of rational thought again.
For the life of me I cannot understand why I or anyone has ever bothered to figure out what the fool is saying. He gets so worked up about being wrong and goes crazy with stupid shit single every day.
It is like an rtard with rabies!
Vikings against Lions W and L for last 10 yrs.
2003 W and W
2004 W and W
2005 W and W
2006 W and W
2007 L and W
2008 W and W
2009 W and W
2010 W and L
2011 L and L
2012 W and W
Maybe what the rtard wanted to say was the vikes have ‘swept’ the Lions in 7 of the last 10 years.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscor...
FUCK AN A MAN!!!!!!! How hard is it to say that?
lol He didn't have a problem understanding me:) The point here is - I was right once again & you like always are made to eat crow. hehe
GBPfan

Colorado Springs, CO

#1162 Sep 7, 2013
Rider on the Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
He's mine to. I need 7 touchdowns out of him Sunday, so I can keep up with my opponent for this week who had Manning for a QB..........
Unfortunately, Finley is more likely to drop 7 TD passes than to catch that many.
viking nation

Madera, CA

#1163 Sep 7, 2013
Packer Backer WichitaKs wrote:
<quoted text>It is time to "put up or shut up" for Finley. The guy has all the physical tools to be one of the best TE's in the NFL. He wants to be paid WR money. Don't know if he is a "flop", but he needs to catch the ball in tough situations. My gut feeling is that he will leave the Packers after this season.
I agree finley is a Good TE I think his real problem is he isn't gel-ing with Rodgers like he should be. For one Rodgers dosn't look for him with his first look like most QBs do with their TE. Rodgers first look is with Cobb & then Jones, Finley his is third look. I was reading someplace on here the coaches want Rodgers to look at his TE first this year & in doing so it will cut down on the unnecessary sacks Rodgers takes by holding onto the ball.
GBPmies

Finland

#1164 Sep 7, 2013
GBPfan wrote:
As if I didn't have enough reason to root for Finley, he is my fantasy TE.
I think Finley will get every opportunity to prove himself this year. Rodgers will look his way often as they have really started to gel, unlike previous seasons.

If the run game gets going and more LBs start looking into the backfield to stop Lacy you can count on Finley being wide open (as shown in previous posts of mine). I think he will have big year and then he will be gone as a FA who is over paid. Fine with me as long as he has the big year first.

I was about to take Finley in my FF league but the guy right before me took him. I took my TE two rounds later....TE Jarod Cook and then took TE Julius Thomas after that. I sat Thomas this week.. oops :)
GBPmies

Finland

#1165 Sep 7, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah what you are saying is right and makes sense, unlike the stupid shit he tried to say. I guess it was his dyslexia getting in the way of rational thought again.
For the life of me I cannot understand why I or anyone has ever bothered to figure out what the fool is saying. He gets so worked up about being wrong and goes crazy with stupid shit single every day.
It is like an rtard with rabies!
Vikings against Lions W and L for last 10 yrs.
2003 W and W
2004 W and W
2005 W and W
2006 W and W
2007 L and W
2008 W and W
2009 W and W
2010 W and L
2011 L and L
2012 W and W
Maybe what the rtard wanted to say was the vikes have ‘swept’ the Lions in 7 of the last 10 years.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscor...
FUCK AN A MAN!!!!!!! How hard is it to say that?
"vikings have swept the Lions 7 out of the last 10 seasons."

- How easy was that to make clear?
- Clear and to the point. No stupid shit involved. Easy peasy Japanessy!
- 1 sentence, 12 words.
GBPmies

Finland

#1166 Sep 7, 2013
I am happy to see the 40 whiners coach is all worked up about the rules concerning the read option and hitting the QB.

Harbaugh tends to react strongly and overly bitchy to everything that does not go his way. Glad to see this upsets him.

I hope it upsets the every coach that plans to run the read option and it makes them think twice about putting their QB put in harms way if they do run it.

Is it targeting? Yes, it is targeting the ball carrier. But when have teams not targeted the QB anyway? It is not like the Packers said we are going for his head or knees. They just plan on hitting if he has the ball or pretends to have it.

I am glad the rules have been made clear week 1
viking nation

Madera, CA

#1167 Sep 7, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
<quoted text>
"vikings have swept the Lions 7 out of the last 10 seasons."
- How easy was that to make clear?
- Clear and to the point. No stupid shit involved. Easy peasy Japanessy!
- 1 sentence, 12 words.
lol True GBPmies Sometimes my post are hard for even me to understand so I can imagine how hard it is for others. I also have Jered Cook as one of my TEs he is a solid player for the Ramsmy other TE is Vikings Kyle Rudolph.
eric

Verona, WI

#1168 Sep 7, 2013
viking nation wrote:
<quoted text>I agree finley is a Good TE I think his real problem is he isn't gel-ing with Rodgers like he should be. For one Rodgers dosn't look for him with his first look like most QBs do with their TE. Rodgers first look is with Cobb & then Jones, Finley his is third look. I was reading someplace on here the coaches want Rodgers to look at his TE first this year & in doing so it will cut down on the unnecessary sacks Rodgers takes by holding onto the ball.
Rodgers doesnt look for Finley as much as he should because he has dropped to many passes and some big ones at that! I believe its a confidence issue,not a game plan issue,,AR would love to throw short and quick passes to the TE and not get hit or sacked as much ( IMO) but again,Finley ( for some reason) lacks concentration and or suffers lapses from time to time..Example,he did shit last year UNTIL the story of Green Bay letting him walk after the season ( right before the Chicago game the story came out) THEN the final 4 of 5 games ( after the story came out) Finley played much better,cut back on the drops.He got his head into the game..This year,hes back 10 lbs more Muscle and quicker ( in a contract year! Imagine that!).The Packers SHOULD benefit bigtime from a monster year from Finley this year but again the concentration must improve and his consistency has to be there
GBPmies

Finland

#1169 Sep 7, 2013
In a span of 100 minutes I was told by the same fool that...

1 I was eating crow because ezg’s thinks everyone understands his posts
2 ezg says he cannot even understand his own posts.

See what I mean? It is rtard meets rabies
Dr Jerkyl meets Mr Dumbass!
eric

Verona, WI

#1170 Sep 7, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
I am happy to see the 40 whiners coach is all worked up about the rules concerning the read option and hitting the QB.
Harbaugh tends to react strongly and overly bitchy to everything that does not go his way. Glad to see this upsets him.
I hope it upsets the every coach that plans to run the read option and it makes them think twice about putting their QB put in harms way if they do run it.
Is it targeting? Yes, it is targeting the ball carrier. But when have teams not targeted the QB anyway? It is not like the Packers said we are going for his head or knees. They just plan on hitting if he has the ball or pretends to have it.
I am glad the rules have been made clear week 1
IT is a game here,He is pissing and moaning how unfair and bias it is, angling for the refs to call it tighter limiting the hits and trying to give Colin K. every advantage he can and not take hits ect.Its a good game plan on his part,I dont know if it will work for him or if it will have to work for him,but, why not try it.Just proves he is a whiner though or willing to be a whiner.IF you remember,ATL almost beat SF in the NFC title game,if not for a shitty call in the last minute,ATL had 1st and goal at SF 7 with just under 1 Minute left.SF offense killed GB defense,then after the offense being on film,ATL adjusted and almost beat them and got screwed out of a chance to beat them.( would they have? No way of knowing BUT,ATL should have had 1st and goal inside SF 10 if not for a very obvious bad call)again who knows but point is ATL adjusted after the SF off. being on tape and The Packers made their game plan clear, if C.K. runs the option, hit him and make him trade yards for hits.Nothing dirty,nothing mean,,nothing to take him out but it pissed SF's coach off to the point it is in their head enough that SF mentioned that it sounds like GB is targeting the qb.
viking nation

Madera, CA

#1171 Sep 7, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
In a span of 100 minutes I was told by the same fool that...
1 I was eating crow because ezg’s thinks everyone understands his posts
2 ezg says he cannot even understand his own posts.
See what I mean? It is rtard meets rabies
Dr Jerkyl meets Mr Dumbass!
You was eating crow & sometimes I do have a hard time understanding my own post That is'nt what is called a jekyll & Hide If anything your post are closer to that then me. Mr Kiss Ass hahaha

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minnesota Vikings Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
National Anthem Mon SFB phart 2
News Breakfast: The Quarterback Domino Effect Feb 18 SFB phart 2
News The Case for Sam Bradford Feb 13 SFB pharts 23
News Minnesota Vikings: Should They Trade for Nick F... Feb 12 SFB phart 13
News Agent: Vikings to sign ex-Eagles OL Josh Andrews Feb 12 SFB pharts 3
Quick look ahead............... Feb 11 SFB phart 43
News Giants denied interview with Vikes OC Stefanski... Feb 11 Viking Shart Snif... 2
More from around the web