Judged:
1
Power rankings involve many things like strength of opponents in wins and quality of those wins. Like Vikings kicking Giants butt with D but not O was a low quality win but running wild over the Bears was a high quality win.
Comments (Page 9)
|
“Carl Eller still eats people!”
Joined: Jan 28, 2008
Comments: 355
Helena, Mt but living in VA
ISP Location:
Hampton, VA
|
Judged:
1 Power rankings involve many things like strength of opponents in wins and quality of those wins. Like Vikings kicking Giants butt with D but not O was a low quality win but running wild over the Bears was a high quality win. |
|
Joined: Apr 2, 2008
Comments: 690
|
Judged:
1 but yet you said Hence why i provided accurate rankings that indicate "power" wins is a terrible indicator period, in regards to the evaluation of a division or to soley evaluate a team....recent example, the patriots, they went 18-1 in the weakest division,do you think there the greatest team in history? The NFC north had balanced wins with 35 yet only 1 team in that division was over .500..i can go on and include the '72 dolphins and etc but you get my drift |
|
“Carl Eller still eats people!”
Joined: Jan 28, 2008
Comments: 355
Helena, Mt but living in VA
ISP Location:
Hampton, VA
|
Wins is a terrible indicator? Are you insane? At the end of the day wins are the only thing that matters. So what if the Patriots went 18-1 in the weakest division. They also beat San Diego twice (11-5) Cleveland (10-6), Dallas (13-3), Indianapolis (13-3), Pittsburgh (10-6), and Jacksonville (11-5). When you beat all three other conference division winners and division winner from another conference, yea I say that means you're pretty damn good. So their 18-1 record is an indicator that that was one of the most powerful teams in history.
|
|
Another overpaid football player.
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2, 2008
Comments: 690
|
yet they played 2games each in there division against the likes of miami,jets,buffalo all very poor teams in there division that combined for a grand total of 12 wins and 36 losses!!Not to mention having a very soft schedule and yet almost losing to teams like the eagles and losing to the giants in the superbowl, a team they almost lost to earlier in the season....yeah..they are a great team,had a nice run had alot of luck on there side. Historic? no,legendary? hardly...Great? yeah sure. Thats like saying the '72 dolphins where the best team ever. You want historic legendary teams? Go google the '85 bears...maybe some old cowboy's and 49'er teams. Did we mention that the mighty Patriots lost to a 10-6 nfc giants team? That why we invented power rankings that compliment Wins and losses. This has nothing to do with the topic anymore and berrian is still overpaid! lol |
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| What's Goin' On: Bears' O raises more questions... | 18 min | Otis | 209 |
| 'A step back' for Rodgers, Packers | 38 min | james roberts | 1 |
| Bears' decision is safe - and sound | 40 min | Chris | 40 |
| Bears fans excited with Hanie's game | 1 hr | _DiMz_ | 17 |
| Is there still hope for Rex? You bet (from Feb '08) | 1 hr | Beer vendor ... | 582 |
| No harm in trying out Hanie | 1 hr | flowergirl | 127 |
| Orton Named Bears' Starting QB | 2 hr | Deep Thinker | 10 |