Will Charles Woodson Be with the Chicago Bears?

Feb 21, 2013 Full story: Rant Sports 141

The sun has set on Charles Woodson and the Green Bay Packers . The future Hall of Famer was released by Green and Mold last week saving the team a reported $10 million, or as they call it in Green Bay, another selling of fake stock.

Full Story
eric

Marshfield, WI

#81 Mar 6, 2013
Packluv1 wrote:
<quoted text> lance Briggs has made the probowl what like nine times, hawk will never be a probowler and the only reason he is on the packers is because the packers defense is one of the worst in the nfl. I take back the practice squad, but he would never make the bears team.
I agree with you that Briggs is a hell of a LB ( although i still say,he made a ton of his living off of Urlacher,as Urlacher was always being game planned against,id love to see Briggs be the person offenses plan against and see how he does)and Pro bowls dont mean squat anymore as we have seen.
Hawk not making the Bears roster is opinion and im sure he would make the roster,now would he start? who knows? but look at Hawks numbers ( pretty similar to Briggs as i pointed out) you got carried away with your Hawk comment ( and we all have done that from time to time ) but as shown, the numbers are quite similar.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#82 Mar 6, 2013
Packluv1 wrote:
<quoted text> lance Briggs has made the probowl what like nine times, hawk will never be a probowler and the only reason he is on the packers is because the packers defense is one of the worst in the nfl. I take back the practice squad, but he would never make the bears team.
Would you like to restate your comment about Hawk never making a Probowl? Hawk made the probowl in 2010.As i said earlier,IMO probowls dont mean squat anymore but for reference and to correct you.Briggs made what 8 or 9,,Hawk made 1 so theres your next point and mine would be well Hawk has won a SB which is something Briggs may never do.
on another subject,,,,YOU made the bet Chicago/GB and the loser leaves Topix forever,,again YOU MADE THE BET and you welched on it.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#83 Mar 6, 2013
Packluv1 wrote:
<quoted text> I didn't welch on bet he did, changed the bet and his story because he lost. Bears didn't have all the pieces in place on offense packers team was hyped as the team that would be a winning dynasty. Full strength and all kinds of weapons and they keep getting creamed in the playoffs and look like they have no business in the playoffs. They cannot compete with the playoff the teams the last few years. They don't even have a good close fighting games in the post season, they give embarassing loses and get blown out big time! It's been a blast to watch as a bear fan. Bears are a on the right path to the SB!
Bears lost to SF 32-7 which last i looked was worse then 45-31 which is what, GB lost to SF in the playoffs when SF was on top of their game.GB beat Minn in the playoffs, GB under Rodgers is 5-3 and a SB championship,SO i guess GB does compete.All 3 playoff loses ( under AR) were to 2 SB losing teams ( ari and SF and both could have won) and a SB Champ ( NYG), where as Chicago made the playoffs ONCE in 6 years and they made the NFC title game and we know what happened there.45-31 is hardly a blowout in todays NFL playoffs,,32-7 is quite another story not to mention Chicagos stellar record vs teams with winning records last year
GBPmies

Finland

#84 Mar 6, 2013
Discussing the bears situation is as worthless as they are against teams with winning records.

1.They have all new coaches, some fired and some QUIT. New HC from CFL?
2.Urlacher in the mix next yr? Who replaces him, Roach? Who replaces Roach?
3.Urlacher returns? He is old and has new HC and D coordinator to deal with
4.CB depth looks to be gone in FA
5.Limited cap space to sign FAs (including their own)
6.Oline probably needs 3 to 4 new starters
7.Cuntler is NOT good and is costing them around 9-10 mil a season!!!! Ouch!

We knew the bears we not legit last year. We explained this last year to packluv who wouldn’t listen. She still won’t!!!

I will tell you this, nothing has happened to give anyone any type of indication the bears will finish any better than 3rd in the North AGAIN for the 3rd time in a row. I see 4th place in their 2013 future.

The entire state of the bears franchise is a question mark = new coaches, newish GM, old players. They have proven nothing except they can NOT compete against winning teams, have never won or done anything at all!!!!! Until the bears prove otherwise they are the 3rd best team in the NFC North… period.

They should draft a QB! They need one! BAD!!!!!
Laughing Bear Fan

Denver, CO

#85 Mar 6, 2013
I think Urlacher will take Cuntler out behind the woodshed and teach him the meaning of "manning up"
eric

Marshfield, WI

#86 Mar 6, 2013
Speaking of qbs..I read where the PACKERS are ready to offer Rodgers a huge deal. Who knows but at 22M under the cap,that would certainly put the squeeze on it, since Rodgers is only 9.5M cap number and will prob be 20M or more, SO, id expect to see Finley being cut or traded shortly after OR be close to the cap until next year where Finley can leave via FA, cut maybe Williams if House,Shields and Hayward prove ready.
Also, today is the day Chris Canty is in GB for a chat and maybe something.I wouldnt expect Ted to do anything today as he seems to always have these guys visit,then sits on it for a while then gets ready to move but that player is gone by then, so hopefully if the interview goes well Ted makes some sort of legit offer and can get it done,as we can really use a bigger DE opposite Pickett and Raji in the middle,that would be solid,but, again they need to find a Dlineman for depth.
GBPmies

Finland

#87 Mar 6, 2013
I remember hearing all the BS about how great Cuntler will be in 2012? Ohhh he has Brandon Marshal back and working under Jeremy Bates again like when he was good in Denver. Bates is FIRED and now he is being directed by a CFL mastermind!

Now we will hear more Bla bla bla crap of how and why cuntler will be good. The FACT is Denver
screwed the Bears in that trade. BIG TIME!

Look how Cuntler compares to other QBs. Not exactly the company an ‘elite QB’ should be keeping is it?- See the trend in names?

WARNING-- the stats you are about to view are FACTS, those impartial to or squeamish to FACT based reasoning should please ignore and continue living in your fantasy land

2012 Total QBR
17 Christian Ponder, MIN 53.8
18 Josh Freeman, TB 53.1
19 Ryan Tannehill, MIA 52.3
20 Jay Cutler, CHI 51.9
21 Sam Bradford, STL 51.6

2012 QB rating
Ryan Fitzpatrick 83.3
Sam Bradford 82.6
Josh Freeman 81.6
Jay Cutler 81.3
Christian Ponder 81.2

Cuntler is the biggest problem in CHI town. He would make a good backup I think... in the CFL
GBPmies

Finland

#88 Mar 6, 2013
See above... so pay cuntler 10 mil per season or bring in a rookie.... I go with a rookie, it can't get much worse. Look at Kaap, Tanehill, and Wilson... all of them are WAY better than the WAY over paid cuntler. The guy is joke! The bears are rebuilding anyway... why rebuild with a proven loser at QB?
eric

Marshfield, WI

#89 Mar 6, 2013
Bite your Tongue ! I want the whiner to sign a real nice 5 year deal worth 65M or so,,Dont you think the whiner deserves 15M per? I certainly DO! Dont forget big bad Brandon Marshall ( who is on his 3rd team before he hit 28,not many super stars can do that!) and his big ole 5 or 6 catches for 65 yards and 1 TD vs GB last year ( against the NFL worst defense according to Pakluv1)
Remember him WHINING about GB double covering him and challenging GB to single cover him and GB shutting his ass down! hahahahahah..
Remember the whiner telling GB Good luck with that when they talked about stopping Marshall!
shouldering his LT as Mathews beat the hell out of the whiner with 5 1/2 sacks and that doesnt include how many times they hit him and laid him out!
Bears and the whiner losing 5 of 6 vs teams with winning records,now they have to rebuild the oline,need another TE and depth on defense,SO, i wouldnt say they are heading toward the SB,they are still a bit away from the playoffs since GB is a better team and Minn is better and both should be better then last year,SF and Seattle are almost a 100er to have a div and a WC,,then there is also NY,Dal and Washington and all 3 are better then Chicago as well,so the Bears have some work in front of them and again a new Off. coord.for Cutler,SO its very possible Chicago gets off to a bit of a slow start offensively so the def. will have to bail them out and lord help them if they face an offence who can score 21 on Chic. def..It will take time for Chicago to get going with that new defense i would think
Packluv1

Lake In The Hills, IL

#90 Mar 6, 2013
eric wrote:
<quoted text>I agree with you that Briggs is a hell of a LB ( although i still say,he made a ton of his living off of Urlacher,as Urlacher was always being game planned against,id love to see Briggs be the person offenses plan against and see how he does)and Pro bowls dont mean squat anymore as we have seen.
Hawk not making the Bears roster is opinion and im sure he would make the roster,now would he start? who knows? but look at Hawks numbers ( pretty similar to Briggs as i pointed out) you got carried away with your Hawk comment ( and we all have done that from time to time ) but as shown, the numbers are quite similar.
you have no idea what you are talking about, Briggs isn't living off 54. Hawk is not in the same league as Briggs not even close. 9 probowls for Briggs and hawk couldn't even make water boy for the bears, go buy some more fake stock to help pay for that over payed hillbilly.
Packluv1

Lake In The Hills, IL

#91 Mar 6, 2013
GBPmies wrote:
Discussing the bears situation is as worthless as they are against teams with winning records.
1.They have all new coaches, some fired and some QUIT. New HC from CFL?
2.Urlacher in the mix next yr? Who replaces him, Roach? Who replaces Roach?
3.Urlacher returns? He is old and has new HC and D coordinator to deal with
4.CB depth looks to be gone in FA
5.Limited cap space to sign FAs (including their own)
6.Oline probably needs 3 to 4 new starters
7.Cuntler is NOT good and is costing them around 9-10 mil a season!!!! Ouch!
We knew the bears we not legit last year. We explained this last year to packluv who wouldn’t listen. She still won’t!!!
I will tell you this, nothing has happened to give anyone any type of indication the bears will finish any better than 3rd in the North AGAIN for the 3rd time in a row. I see 4th place in their 2013 future.
The entire state of the bears franchise is a question mark = new coaches, newish GM, old players. They have proven nothing except they can NOT compete against winning teams, have never won or done anything at all!!!!! Until the bears prove otherwise they are the 3rd best team in the NFC North… period.
They should draft a QB! They need one! BAD!!!!!
at least we do know this... This current packers team has choked big time more often than not in the playoffs, it's there mo
Donks fan

United States

#92 Mar 6, 2013
He Will land in Denver. He's buddies with Champ.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#93 Mar 7, 2013
Packluv1 wrote:
<quoted text> you have no idea what you are talking about, Briggs isn't living off 54. Hawk is not in the same league as Briggs not even close. 9 probowls for Briggs and hawk couldn't even make water boy for the bears, go buy some more fake stock to help pay for that over payed hillbilly.
So your paying 9M or so for a guy who couldnt be a waterboy? Since ive proven Hawks numbers are pretty simular to Briggs and Hawk wouldnt even make waterboy for the Bears,Man,you team is more pathetic then i thought. So,WHO has the SuperBowl Ring again? Thats what I thought,so go pay your 3,500 PSL to watch the Bears in that shithole field or yours and enjoy your 3rd place finish as you give the waterboy 9M per after he cried he would never play in Chicago ever again.Your telling me that Briggs doesnt make more playes because opposing offenses game plan with a specific eye and plan on Urlacher I just hope Urlacher leaves Chicago then we can see just how good he actually is,Im not stupid like you,Briggs is a very good LB but, hes much better because of Urlacher,thats fact and his numbers ( again as ive showed you) is pretty similar to Hawk,so again,if Hawk cant make waterboy and Briggs makes 9M or so,wellllll,you can fiqure it out from here.As far as 9 ProBowls? it matters so much that they prob wont play the probowl anymore,so much for that!
eric

Marshfield, WI

#94 Mar 7, 2013
Donks fan wrote:
He Will land in Denver. He's buddies with Champ.
Denver would make sense. They have a whole lot better chance of making a SB and winning one then Chicago has, and at 37 or 38,he prob. has another 2 years or so ( barring injury of course) and hes broken that same collar bone twice within a year and a half or so span
eric

Marshfield, WI

#95 Mar 7, 2013
Packluv1 wrote:
<quoted text> at least we do know this... This current packers team has choked big time more often than not in the playoffs, it's there mo
Peyton Manning and his teams have been 1 and done 6 or 7 times in the past, decade or so and 1 SB,,,NE and Brady havent won a SB since 04 ( 8 season,soon to be 9 unless they win it next year) and havent won a SB since Spygate and lost 2 of them,NYG won 2 SB and missed the playoffs in 12 after winning it in 11.NO had this unstoppable team,won it in 09,lost how many in a row ( playoff games) on the road?
Bottom line,,GB has nothing to be embarrassed about,,Since 09, lost to ARI ( who made the SB and lost and could have won) 10 won the SB,,11 lost to the NYG ( who won the SB) 12 lost to SF ( who lost the SB and should have won it or very easily could have)
CHICAGO,the big bad Bears with that record setting defense..NO playoffs in 5 of the last 6 years and the 1 year they made it,,GREEN BAY sent you home denying you the SB and your followed that up with a 8-3 record before choking the last 5 games and missing the playoffs,then followed that up witha 7-1 record and finished with a 10-6 record because you were 1-5 vs teams with a winning record,,talk about a choke job, Go welch on some more bets,,keep wishing the Bears were as good as the Packers, pray that 1 day you actually beat the Packers since you havent beaten them in 3 years or so,,hope you can actaully finish higher then 3rd in a division and if the wind is behind you and you catch a few more games with highschool teams,lower end college teams,you just might p.u. a few more wins and maybe get there ( although if you did get there,you would get destroyed)..Id rather lose in the playoffs 45-31 to a SB team like SF,then choke 2 regular seasons away,,SO, id suspect you will make you bet again,you will lose again,you will not come back until GB loses or Chicago wins as you welch yet another bet,then you jealousy over a real team will continue to show as you bash a playoff team and a SB champion team and you continually choke the playoffs after a nice start! Enjoy

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#96 Mar 7, 2013
eric wrote:
<quoted text>Denver would make sense. They have a whole lot better chance of making a SB and winning one then Chicago has, and at 37 or 38,he prob. has another 2 years or so ( barring injury of course) and hes broken that same collar bone twice within a year and a half or so span
He can still play, some intelligent safety....smart enough to be behind the play....just what Denver needs.....like a player/coach....
Packluv1

Lake In The Hills, IL

#97 Mar 7, 2013
eric wrote:
<quoted text>So your paying 9M or so for a guy who couldnt be a waterboy? Since ive proven Hawks numbers are pretty simular to Briggs and Hawk wouldnt even make waterboy for the Bears,Man,you team is more pathetic then i thought. So,WHO has the SuperBowl Ring again? Thats what I thought,so go pay your 3,500 PSL to watch the Bears in that shithole field or yours and enjoy your 3rd place finish as you give the waterboy 9M per after he cried he would never play in Chicago ever again.Your telling me that Briggs doesnt make more playes because opposing offenses game plan with a specific eye and plan on Urlacher I just hope Urlacher leaves Chicago then we can see just how good he actually is,Im not stupid like you,Briggs is a very good LB but, hes much better because of Urlacher,thats fact and his numbers ( again as ive showed you) is pretty similar to Hawk,so again,if Hawk cant make waterboy and Briggs makes 9M or so,wellllll,you can fiqure it out from here.As far as 9 ProBowls? it matters so much that they prob wont play the probowl anymore,so much for that!
Briggs is scoring touchdowns and is still playing out of his mind at his age, every season I read on this site the debate over hawk. The talk is he should be traded , he sucks, over payed and on in on. That is every season he has played in greenbay.You are an idiot if you think hawk is in the same league as Briggs. But your dumb enough to think you are an owner of the greenbay packers. Lol you can't fix stupid. I noticed a lot of regulars have left this site since the packers most recent post season embarassing loss. When you have to sell hawk as one of your best players on defense you know your defense is in trouble. I heard Jennings wants out of greenbay because fans keep grabbing his bratwurst when he does the lame boo leap, what's up with that?
eric

Marshfield, WI

#98 Mar 7, 2013
He should be traded because the Packers need cap space and with in Bishop,Smith and Perry coming back and most lilely they will be in position of drafting another LB high AND Terrell Manning showed a ton of progress, Thats makes Hawk available for trade and compensation an,d free up a few million in cap space so they can resign Mathews,Rodgers and Raji.
As i proved,his numbers are very simalar to Briggs, and ive said many times,Briggs is a good LB,ive got nothing against him ( except Urlacher makes his life a whole lot easier) example,what happened after Urlacher missed the last 4 games last year with a hammy? Chicago LOST 3 of them and thank God for Det. or you would have lost all 4.SO, who left? Reggie,he was here for a few months and he will be back at draft time,everyone else is here except for the guy form Colorado,SO again Hawk Sucks,Briggs is way better but their numbers are very similar and Hawk has a SB ring. Nice going,i didnt think you could get more stupid,but, congrats you did it! IVE NEVER SAID BRIGGS SUCKS,YOU said Hawk wouldnt make Chicago practice squad or water boy,I PROVED their numbers are very simalar. Yes id trade Hawk, we need cap space for Rodgers and Mathews and with Desmond Bishop coming back,Terrell Manning getting ready to shine and a good chance of a good LB being their in the upper part of the draft,Hawk can be had for a nice pick and free up cap space.Good players are victims of the cap,theres no way around it.Like I said Hawk Captained a SB winning defense, I dont see one in Chicago.Too Bad Jennings said he would like to be back in GB,its GB that let him go,he wants 12M per and GB has to many big deals coming up and are deep at WR.You think im an idiot but ive PROVED my point,alls you proved is your basically a troll who is a welcher and is so jealous of the Packers,you can only wish the Bears are as good as GB and the fact GB knocked Chicago from the SB is eating you alive.Making your self look like an ass isnt helping yourself here.Alls i said is their numbers are similar when you said Hawk wouldnt make the Bears practice squad and ive PROVED the numbers are simalar except Hawk has the ultimate prize,Briggs,well, not so much.
eric

Marshfield, WI

#99 Mar 7, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>He can still play, some intelligent safety....smart enough to be behind the play....just what Denver needs.....like a player/coach....
absolutely! I was very happy witn Woodson for the most part,Alot of defensive holdings and PI in his final year or so but a player coach is a good thing to have,but, again,GB needed the cap space and with MD Jennings,Jarron McMillan and a for the most part a deep safety draft,another can be had and can sit on the bench more often then not and learn for the 13 season like many of TT rookies.
TT drafted defense in April 12 draft and we will see how that rates out starting in the 13 season ( this year and over the next few years) as it takes a few years to determine if a draft is good or bad.
GBPmies

Finland

#100 Mar 7, 2013
WARNING FACTS AE INCLUDED IN THIS POST

Well it seems the bears ‘mo’ is consistently missing the playoffs and losing if they do get there. Compare them to the Packers and the bears look horrible!

Bears
Playoff record all-time= 17-18 (a losing record)
Record in last 10 playoff games= 4- 6 (a losing record)
#playoff games since 1991= 10

So -the bears have a losing playoff record. They have only had 10 playoff games since 1991 (21yrs). In those games they have a losing record and no Super Bowl wins.

Packers
Playoff record all-time= 31 – 19 (a winning record)
Last 10 playoff games= 6 -4 (a winning record)
#playoff games since 1991= 30

So - the Packers have a very good playoff record. They have had 30 playoff games since 1991 (21 yrs, that is 3 times as many playoff games than the bears. The Packers have also won 2 Super Bowls since in that time.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Bears Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
2013 NFL Mock Draft: Current Info for All 32 Fi... (Jan '13) 2 hr Buy a Bowel 130
Vikings waive Ot J'Marcus Webb 2 hr Diarrhea Waive 2
14-Year-Old Boy Shot In Head On Far South Side 3 hr Taint Shield 4
Report: Bears likely to fire Trestman 4 hr Laughing Bear Fan 1
Bears GM Phil Emery 'disappointed, upset' by Aa... Tue Tanked Johnson 1
Marc Trestman on loss to Lions: 'I'm looking in... Tue Tanked Johnson 2
Brees's Saints march past Bears Tue Bears fan 2