The purchase of the weapon was subjected to a background check.<quoted text>
With the emphasis on Specious.
PS- the assault weapon the gun gnutter in Connecticut used was legal and NRA approved. If the NRA had it's way, it would approve of the sale to him again. After all, they gave him a certificate.
The weapon was not sold to HIM, it belonged to his mother.
Neither Adam Lanza or his mother were NRA members. Even if they were, how would that make the NRA responsible for the actions of an individual? The certificate was either for a safety or shooting course. The NRA has no direct involvement in that either. Regardless, it’s just evidence a course was completed. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...
You're grasping at straws.