Only cowards need guns
LOST IN MISSISSIPPI

Ludington, MI

#6905 Apr 14, 2013
tallyho wrote:
<quoted text>
yes you did , no matter what id you use
what you talkin about pops

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#6906 Apr 14, 2013
Our freedom depends on our guns. Realpolitik. Freaks them out.

Love your nation.

“....VETS”

Level 9

Since: Jan 08

WELCOME HOME

#6907 Apr 14, 2013
LOST IN MISSISSIPPI wrote:
<quoted text>what you talkin about pops
reporting and you .......... lets go back to the trayvon thread they need you there
LOST IN MISSISSIPPI

Ludington, MI

#6908 Apr 14, 2013
tallyho wrote:
<quoted text>
reporting and you .......... lets go back to the trayvon thread they need you there
since it is all ya got left go for it pops

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6909 Apr 14, 2013
eternal cynic wrote:
Cite poll sources and methodology?
The sun rises in the east.

I have already sourced MANY times the 90 percent figure (putting aside the 90 percent figure is available from many sources immediately).

I don't have to pull your head out of your azz and make you agree.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6910 Apr 14, 2013
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
Your “facts” are anything but overwhelming. You never reveal sources, you simply spout crap.
What a shame it is that since I have already refuted this, you aren't simple banned for being the m/f c/s lying sack of excrement you are.

Type "90 percent" into google.

You don't even have to type in "background checks".

Take your pick.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6911 Apr 14, 2013
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
The source of the 90 percent number came from
Nope.

Let's type in "90 percent" and see what google finds...

"Despite concerns about how information on gun owners might be used, 91 percent of registered voters support universal background checks, according to a new poll released on Thursday.

Only 8 percent of voters surveyed by Quinnipiac University's Polling Institute March 26 to April 1 stated opposition to universal background checks—something the White House, many Democrats in Congress and and gun-violence opponents are pushing in the wake of the December shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. In households with guns, 88 percent of respondents expressed support for checks."

(clip)

++

First of many.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6912 Apr 14, 2013
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
The purchase of the weapon was subjected to a background check.
So what?

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6913 Apr 14, 2013
eternal cynic wrote:
<
Neither Adam Lanza or his mother were NRA members.
You don't know if they were members one way or the other.

What we do know is: the NRA certificates, being in their house, means the NRA was in some way: involved.

AND I think it's HILARIOUS that anyone would use Glen Beck as a resource.

http://www.thesmokingjacket.com/wp-content/up...

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6914 Apr 14, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
Our freedom depends on our guns..
The pen is mightier than a fat white guy pretending to be a patriot wearing a side arm shooting his mouth off in a Wal*Mart parking lot.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6915 Apr 14, 2013
tallyho wrote:
<quoted text>yes you did , no matter what id you use
Why is it, every time you get called on putting words in people's mouths, you rebut by accusing everyone of being one poster? You should know by now that form of deflection doesn't work.

Here is the post you claim contains the assertion that the constitution gives people rights, when in fact, eternal cynic simply stated it protects individuals' rights.
eternal cynic wrote:
<quoted text>
The US Constitution is about defining government powers and limiting that government while protecting the rights of the individual. The rights of the individual were of paramount concern to the framers.

Now, go cry to the mods that its not fair for me to prove you wrong and embarrass you in front of everyone.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6916 Apr 14, 2013
Denny CranesPlace wrote:
<quoted text>Gun free zones are an invitation to mass killers. Come on in, no one here can shot back :(
Precisely!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6917 Apr 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>What a shame it is that since I have already refuted this, you aren't simple banned for being the m/f c/s lying sack of excrement you are.

Type "90 percent" into google.

You don't even have to type in "background checks".

Take your pick.
That is what you call sourcing?
Google provides a list of articles with the key words you type in. Which one, specifically, did you use? Are you afraid of listing your source for fear it will be debunked?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6918 Apr 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>Nope.

Let's type in "90 percent" and see what google finds...

"Despite concerns about how information on gun owners might be used, 91 percent of registered voters support universal background checks, according to a new poll released on Thursday.

Only 8 percent of voters surveyed by Quinnipiac University's Polling Institute March 26 to April 1 stated opposition to universal background checks—something the White House, many Democrats in Congress and and gun-violence opponents are pushing in the wake of the December shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. In households with guns, 88 percent of respondents expressed support for checks."

(clip)

++

First of many.
Lmao! Polls are irrelevant. Polls can be manipulated to say anything someone wants them to say, by the wording of the questions, limiting answer options, choosing certain pools of people to poll in the first place, and leading the polled group.
It shows just how willing Democrats are to be led around by the nose, when they buy into such ridiculous numbers from a poll, as fact.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6919 Apr 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>You don't know if they were members one way or the other.

What we do know is: the NRA certificates, being in their house, means the NRA was in some way: involved.

AND I think it's HILARIOUS that anyone would use Glen Beck as a resource.

http://www.thesmokingjacket.com/wp-content/up...

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!
Ah, so certificates indicate involvement in a crime? Wow, explain how that works!
BYW, yes, it has been confirmed that the Lanzas were NOT NRA members.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/28/nra-...

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/adam-la...

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/28...

http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-adam-lanza...

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6920 Apr 14, 2013
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
Precisely!
The NRA provides the breeding grounds for mass killings since they fight laws that keep people from carry assault weapons into public schools, they fight laws that make it harder for people to buy assault weapons, since they insist thirty round and 100 round magazines are used by "sportsmen" and "hunters" and of course since the NRA doesn't want to do background checks on weapon sales.

The NRA put this AR-15 in Lanza's hands.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6921 Apr 14, 2013
Dr-Sniper wrote:
BYW, yes, it has been confirmed that the Lanzas were NOT NRA members.
You have NO idea if they were or they weren't.

Funny how the NRA doesn't provide a list of its members except to deny killers were members.

What we have established: you LIE when you say there was no connection between the LANZA's and the NRA.

NEXT!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6922 Apr 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>The NRA provides the breeding grounds for mass killings since they fight laws that keep people from carry assault weapons into public schools, they fight laws that make it harder for people to buy assault weapons, since they insist thirty round and 100 round magazines are used by "sportsmen" and "hunters" and of course since the NRA doesn't want to do background checks on weapon sales.

The NRA put this AR-15 in Lanza's hands.
Schools being Gun Free Zones is what makes them targets for mass shootings. The NRA has nothing to do with it. Did the NRA prevent Sandy Hook from being a Gun Free Zone within a State with strict gun control laws, including an assault weapons ban?
No, the NRA did NOT put the AR-15 in Adam Lanza's hands! In fact, Adam Lanza tried to purchase firearms and was declined. So he stole the guns from his mom. Adam broke the law by attempting to buy guns. He was not arrested or charged. If he had been, he would not have had the chance to break the law again by stealing his mom's guns, or again by killing people.
His mom had started the process to have him committed to a mental institution. Had he been arrested for illegally attempting to purchase guns, he would have been committed immediately upon release, thereby never having the chance to kill.
Why do we need more gun control laws, when the ones we have are not enforced?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6923 Apr 14, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>You have NO idea if they were or they weren't.

Funny how the NRA doesn't provide a list of its members except to deny killers were members.

What we have established: you LIE when you say there was no connection between the LANZA's and the NRA.

NEXT!
I see you edited out the links that prove the Lanzas were NOT NRA members. Do here they are again:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/28/nra-...

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/adam-la...

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/28...

http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-adam-lanza...

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

Lmao! You WOULD expect a national organization to violate peoples' right to privacy. That says so much about you.

You keep saying I have been proven a liar, yet fail to supply proof, a post, or a post number to back your claim. Everyone knows it is you, who is the liar.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6924 Apr 14, 2013
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<
BYW, yes, it has been confirmed that the Lanzas were NOT NRA members.
You cannot prove one way or the other.

But an association with the NRA HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.

NEXT!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Change 1 letter game! (Nov '11) 2 min Big Ern- 10,679
*add A word / drop a word* (Nov '12) 3 min Big Ern- 16,662
Last Post Wins! (Aug '08) 4 min Charlie 150,024
Life is incomplete without ..... (what?) (Feb '14) 6 min Charlie 799
What's one thing you appreciate in your life? 7 min Charlie 106
Poll What are you thinking right now? (May '08) 9 min Charlie 3,997
got any jokes (Sep '08) 35 min Ricky F 142
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr KellyP in Jersey 216,966
A to Z songs by title or group! 3 hr Sweetie-Pie 1,798
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 4 hr Denny CranesPlace 75,152
What turns you on ? (Aug '11) 6 hr Sharlene45 2,507
More from around the web