Only cowards need guns

Dr-Sniper wrote:

<quoted text>
You are

Brian_G wrote:

What about marksmen? Don't they need guns?

REDBUTT HERPIES wrote:

<quoted text>
WHAT A MAROON

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
'Beliefs' would be religious objections, dumbazz.
Do explain why a state would pass speed laws if they made an exception for anyone who could legally ignore them for no other reason other than they just didn't want to obey them?
Look up "conscientious objectors".
And cross-reference: atheist.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny how the gun gnutters cite half the second amendment (and ignore the first half) but scream and stomp when people use the first amendment to point out that they are full of cr@p.
Funny how that is.

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
can't read back step for me not you
tired of you no matter what id you use
reported

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
reported

tallyho wrote:

repeating..........
The law of the United States consists of many levels[1] of codified and uncodified forms of law, of which the most important is the United States Constitution, the foundation of the federal government of the United States. The Constitution sets out the boundaries of federal law, which consists of constitutional acts of Congress, constitutional treaties ratified by Senate[2], constitutional regulations promulgated by the executive branch, and case law originating from the federal judiciary.
The Constitution and federal law are the supreme law of the land, thus preempting conflicting state and territorial laws in the fifty U.S. states and in the territories.

Force Majeure wrote:

<quoted text>
A "marksman" is anyone who can pull the trigger. They are the least able to shoot well. I don't think you want them carrying guns around with them.

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
I would oppose any law which actually requires ownership of a firearm. Your apparent difficulty is tied to your inability to understand the ordinance which I’ve posted.
Effectively the Kennesaw law requires every head of household to own a firearm unless they don’t want to.

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
Keep on reporting. I use just one name on here. You’re sounding like a little girl again screaming “Mommy Billy looked at me”.

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
Wah wah wah. Keep crying putz.

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The federal government is in violation of the US Constitution. See Amendment 10.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people
You’re plagiarizing Wiki again http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_Unite...
Is Wiki your supreme authority? Did you know even morons can edit Wiki? You been busy again?

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
You might want to review the definition of marksman.

Force Majeure wrote:

A "marksman" is anyone who can pull the trigger. They are the least able to shoot well. I don't think you want them carrying guns around with them.

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>And you pick the name 'Force Majeure', do you know what that means? The individual is stronger in a group and stronger still, with a gun. The issue is freedom, government can't take our guns unless we commit a crime.
God bless the Second Amendment!

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
Start whining to SCOTUS as well. Through the Heller decision SCOTUS concluded the second amendment was an individual right.

eternal cynic wrote:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people