Only cowards need guns

[au contraire]

newportonehundreds wrote:

...Yeh guns are made for killing that sux but its still fun shooting a foot and half thick tree with a shotgun cutting it in half with the gauge....

You don't know much about shotguns do you?

[au contraire]

rajibastard wrote:

<quoted text>yea and making c'unts dance as you shoot around there feet and shit ..yeeeeeeeeeeeehaaaawwwwwwwwww !

You only get one pookie, then its your turn to dance. Up on your toes sweety.

[rajibastard]

au contraire wrote:

<quoted text>You only get one pookie, then its your turn to dance. Up on your toes sweety.

au contraire no-one mentioned any rules.I got all the guns n shit

[Brian_G]

I like guns.

Be thankful you live in a nation with individual rights.

[rajibastard]

Brian_G wrote:

I like guns.
Be thankful you live in a nation with individual rights.

yea we all see that shit on cops every night when the cops are knocking seven colours of shit out of every mother f'ucker. personally i think the c'unts are full of steroids and are roid raging all over YOUR individual rights yea be gratefull you dont see it from the otherside of the fence where f'uckers are civilised.Open your eyes.Your only true freedom is to kiss their steriod injected asses.Dont think its not your turn next each one a little hitler you used to bully at school ready to blow a fuse and say f'uck your rights

[Brand New Libertarian]

The Last True Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
Someone tried to break into my house five years ago; when he heard the *rack!* and *snap!* as I chambered a round in my Beretta 92F, he took off like his ass was on fire.
You are an idiot and a troll.

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
you said an AR-15 ...now why do you need an AR-15

Because I need one. Why do you need a computer?

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>plus I bet he took off because some one was home ,

Damn right someone was home; and armed.

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text> you know like a barking dog .. a light comes on
now why do you need an AR-15

Because I need one.

[Brand New Libertarian]

The Last True Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
I was pointing out that fundamentalists always act alike in attitude, whether they're religionists or liberals. Both sides state, "I am absolutely right, and anyone who disagrees with me is completely and totally wrong!!"
<quoted text>
No, it's more like what *you're* doing. If you don't like guns, don't have one. But don't tell me I can't make *my* own choices, troll.

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
where did I the GLP ever tell you , or anyone they can not have a gun , if they are legally are allowed to..

With every post you write.
Not only does the law allow me to own an AR-15, but the United States Constitution *recognizes my RIGHT* to own one. You obviously have a problem understanding that.

[rajibastard]

The Last True Liberal wrote:

The Last True Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
Someone tried to break into my house five years ago; when he heard the *rack!* and *snap!* as I chambered a round in my Beretta 92F, he took off like his ass was on fire.
You are an idiot and a troll.
<quoted text>
Because I need one. Why do you need a computer?
<quoted text>
Damn right someone was home; and armed.
<quoted text>
Because I need one.

yea very liberal of you

[Brand New Libertarian]

The Last True Overhaul wrote:
<quoted text>
Cops aren't cowards because they have guns, but civilians are cowards because they have guns? Care to explain how that works

Forced Manure wrote:

<quoted text> Sure.
Cops need guns because it's their job to serve and protect.

WRONG. You got that off of the door of a police car, which is nothing but PR. It is **NOT** their job to "serve and protect" us.
It is my job--my OBLIGATION--to protect my family.

You still did not explain how cops with guns are not cowards while civilians with guns are. You can't.

Forced Manure wrote:

<quoted text Civilans are suppose to ring for the police when in need.

And then sit and wait? Hide in the bathroom and cower in fear, hoping not to be killed, like you have to do?

"9-1-1--When seconds count, help is only minutes away!"

Forced Manure wrote:

<quoted text It is true that the military "should" have guns too, to protect the nation, but the United Snakes military is over in other countries raping, torturing and murdering innocent men, women, and children

You are obviously nothing but an America hater and a fucking liar. You are not interested in debate, you are interested only in hating America and Americans. You're just a socialist piece of shit who demands that the wealth of others be redistributed to assholes like you, and you want them disarmed so they cannot protect what they have worked for.

You are worse than a socialist, you are a fucking communist.

I and other honest, hard-working Americans are all keeping our firearms so our country does not wind up like that frozen, over-flowing toilet you live in, and there isn't a goddamned thing you can do about it. Does that piss you off? Good. I'm glad.

You now have my permission to fuck off.

[Brand New Libertarian]

Nancy Botwin wrote:
<quoted text>
My answer has nothing to do with crime...it has to do with good Americans protecting our homeland against a TOTALITARIAN FASCIST DICTATORSHIP, which is careening towards the U.S. like an out of control freight train as I write. It has to do with the balance of power between the people of this country and the government which is increasingly ignoring the people. That is the truth of the matter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
so you are:The Last True Liberal , why the double IDs aren't you proud of yourself .

I am not Nancy Botwin, you moron. Put down the bong, and pay attention to whose posts you're reading.

[Brand New Libertarian]

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
Gobbels is dead...

He lives on inside of people like you.

[Brand New Libertarian]

Nancy Botwin wrote:
<quoted text>
What are you talking about? I'm the "dreaded Nancy Botwin" and NO ONE ELSE! Nice attempt at diversion though!

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
now who else says "diversion and deflect "on here and I ask lib about the AR-15 and you answered..
since 07.... hum the way you shoot your mouth off and only 5,000 posts

You need to step away from your bong.

[Brand New Libertarian]

Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
A non mass shooting isn't what you have addressed for a month now either.
In this circumstance, one of the victims knew, and wanted to help the shooter which was suffering from PTSD. As far as anybody knows, the other victim was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.
No matter what you do, notated what law is passed, no matter how many guns are banned, even if every gun in America were made illegal, you will never eliminate gun murders.

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
as hard as you try , no matter which ID you use

Like a fundamentalist christian who can't win an argument against an atheist, you can't win an argument against a pro-gunner--so you accuse each of your opponents of being a sock.

It's called "deflection."

[Brand New Libertarian]

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum 48,700 post your right , I'm busted half of my id is tallyho and the other half is my twin talyho

Fucktard idiots like you should not be allowed to own firearms. You'd be looking down the barrel with your finger on the trigger, wondering what the bullet looks like when it comes out.

On second thought, maybe you *should* buy yourself a gun...

[Brand New Libertarian]

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
you don't know what you posted here once again..

Half the time, you don't even know who you're posting to.

[Brand New Libertarian]

tallyho wrote:
<quoted text>so I can call you a dumb-ass for thinking you need an AR-15

Dr-Sniper wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't have to explain or qualify a need. It's irrelevant, because its a right.

I'm thinking old tally-ho is one of those wannabe hippies who tells himself that he needs his "medical" marijuana.

He sure does post like he's stoned.

[Brand New Libertarian]

tallyho wrote:

OH lets see NANCY now ...
The Fourth Amendment requires searches and seizures to be "reasonable", which generally means that police must get a search warrant if they want to conduct a legal search or seizure, although there are exceptions to this general rule. If a search or seizure is "unreasonable" and thus illegal, then police cannot use the evidence obtained through that search or seizure in a criminal trial. This is called the exclusionary rule and it is the primary incentive against government agents violating your Fourth Amendment rights.
and when was your 4th violated , my hasn't been but then I make all efforts to obeys the laws of the land ..
INFO: Plagiarism is taking the writings or literary ideas of another and selling and/or publishing them as one's own writing. Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.
Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.
Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.
Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.

So, you are saying *you* have no right to privacy, right?

What about when some cop smells all that burning weed coming from your house?

[Brand New Libertarian]

Rambler wrote:

M-16....piece of crap, Piss Poor Replacement to the M-14 in Nam.
Much improved these days...
Done.

Galil!!

http://world.guns.ru/assault/isr/galil-e.html

[Brand New Libertarian]

01Justsayin wrote:

Guns don't kill people. Stupid people with guns kill people.

As do stupid people with cars. I propose a fifteen-day waiting period on all car sales. After all, cars are not a right--but self defense is.

[tallyho]

ha ha ha what are you going to do about it

yes slack and sweetie-pie