Only cowards need guns

[milwaukee69]

REDNECK HIPPIE wrote:

<quoted text>
Booooooooooooooring

LMFGDAO...and cut and pasting 35 James Madison quotes aren't?

Dude, get back inside the fence.

[au contraire]

milwaukee69 wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? I've got the Tribune right here on my desk, what news source are you using? Foxpaux news?

ANOTHER LIE FROM OBAMA, WE SHOOT ALL THE TIME, PROBLEM IS, HE HASN’T BEEN TO CAMP DAVID VERY MUCH AT ALL.

Amid conservative anger over Mr Obama's proposals to ban assault weapons as part of a drastic overhaul of US gun control laws, the president said that he was a keen clay-pigeon shooter.
Asked in a magazine interview whether he had ever fired a gun, Mr Obama said he did so with guests at the president's rural retreat.
"Up at Camp David, we do skeet shooting all the time," he said. "And I have a profound respect for the traditions of hunting that trace back in this country for generations.
ANOTHER LIE FROM OBAMA, WE SHOOT ALL THE TIME, PROBLEM IS, HE HASN’T BEEN TO CAMP DAVID SINCE JUNE.

Camp David's infrequent visitor

By AMIE PARNES | Camp David has been an alluring retreat for presidents since Franklin Roosevelt, its lush hills and secluded trails miles from the Beltway bubble and the prying eyes of the press.
But as President Barack Obama enters his third summer at the White House, he hasn’t embraced the rustic getaway the same way as many of his predecessors.
The president, a BlackBerry guy who prefers being on the grid to being on a nature trail, has made a habit of skipping weekend trips to Camp David. His day-and-a-half-long visit to the retreat June 10-12 was his first trip there since October, and he hasn’t invited any world leaders or lawmakers to the wooded hideaway in Maryland’s Catoctin Mountains.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/573...

[Naughtyrobot]

http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/27/illegal-gun...
I guess hypocrites need guns too.

[milwaukee69]

au contraire wrote:

<quoted text>ANOTHER LIE FROM OBAMA, WE SHOOT ALL THE TIME, PROBLEM IS, HE HASN’T BEEN TO CAMP DAVID VERY MUCH AT ALL.
Amid conservative anger over Mr Obama's proposals to ban assault weapons as part of a drastic overhaul of US gun control laws, the president said that he was a keen clay-pigeon shooter.
Asked in a magazine interview whether he had ever fired a gun, Mr Obama said he did so with guests at the president's rural retreat.
"Up at Camp David, we do skeet shooting all the time," he said. "And I have a profound respect for the traditions of hunting that trace back in this country for generations.
ANOTHER LIE FROM OBAMA, WE SHOOT ALL THE TIME, PROBLEM IS, HE HASN’T BEEN TO CAMP DAVID SINCE JUNE.
Camp David's infrequent visitor
By AMIE PARNES | Camp David has been an alluring retreat for presidents since Franklin Roosevelt, its lush hills and secluded trails miles from the Beltway bubble and the prying eyes of the press.
But as President Barack Obama enters his third summer at the White House, he hasn’t embraced the rustic getaway the same way as many of his predecessors.
The president, a BlackBerry guy who prefers being on the grid to being on a nature trail, has made a habit of skipping weekend trips to Camp David. His day-and-a-half-long visit to the retreat June 10-12 was his first trip there since October, and he hasn’t invited any world leaders or lawmakers to the wooded hideaway in Maryland’s Catoctin Mountains.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/573...

LMFGDAO...deflect much?

[milwaukee69]

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
don't blame fox he may have gotten it here
37 People Were Shot Over The Weekend In Chicago
Jun 21, 2010 .......... note date

LMFGDAO...he may also be a loony toon.

[Websters]

Gun Control - Definition:

Gun control is using both hands to steady the weapon when you shoot the armed traitorous liberal criminal bastard that is breaking into your home.

[milwaukee69]

Websters wrote:

Gun Control - Definition:
Gun control is using both hands to steady the weapon when you shoot the armed traitorous liberal criminal bastard that is breaking into your home.

Why would anybody break into the city dump?

[lil-wolfie]

anyone who carrys a gun for self defense when threatened by someone who's threating them with a gun.aint a coward.thier simply defending and protecting them self as they see fit.if i had what i call the correct hand gun.i'd have a coneled hand gun permit just so i can protect my self against a criminal that has no permit for the gun she/he has pointed at me.

[dragoon70056]

milwaukee69 wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? I've got the Tribune right here on my desk, what news source are you using? Foxpaux news?

Actually, Foxpaux got it right.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/27/at-least...

Still, so much for gun control.

[milwaukee69]

dragoon70056 wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, Foxpaux got it right.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/27/at-least...
Still, so much for gun control.

Actually, according to the French guy with a female avatar, Fox isn't anywhere close - approximately 27 short.

"Ask Rahm and Obama, there were 34 people killed in Chicago over the weekend."

[tallyho]

lil-wolfie wrote:

anyone who carrys a gun for self defense when threatened by someone who's threating them with a gun.aint a coward.thier simply defending and protecting them self as they see fit.if i had what i call the correct hand gun.i'd have a coneled hand gun permit just so i can protect my self against a criminal that has no permit for the gun she/he has pointed at me.

anyone who reaches for a gun when one is pointed at their head , is an idiot permit or no permit

[Denny Crain]

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
anyone who reaches for a gun when one is pointed at their head , is an idiot permit or no permit

Depends on what went on before he came to you. If he had shot 5 people already you knew your turn was coming so why not try to fight back

[milwaukee69]

Denny Crain wrote:

<quoted text>Depends on what went on before he came to you. If he had shot 5 people already you knew your turn was coming so why not try to fight back

Well I wouldn't ask you to count - you don't know the difference between 50,000,000 guns and 17,000,000 guns in Texas.

[au contraire]

milwaukee69 wrote:

<quoted text>
LMFGDAO...deflect much?

No, just showing the liberal mind is like our tax laws, there are many holes for the truth to slip through.

[au contraire]

milwaukee69 wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, according to the French guy with a female avatar, Fox isn't anywhere close - approximately 27 short.
"Ask Rahm and Obama, there were 34 people killed in Chicago over the weekend."

Maybe if you were smart enough to look at all violent deaths instead of just shootings your would know the difference. Do we have teach you children everything?

[Force Majeure]

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
ahemmmmmmmmmmmm a wide open joke sitting right there , you must be joking right ???????

No, it's no joke. All of the discussions about banning guns are about the concensus of gun controll in the U.S.

As usually is the case, the American pro-gun buffoonery starts in with "it's the person, not the gun ..... bla, bla, bla". Then comes the smoke-screen BS about the gun/murder ratio in Tramtaria (or some other country) which is meant to prove that guns themselves are not the problem - therefore everyone in the U.S.(it is argued) should have the right to own firearms. But that's a red herring.

The upshot is that the "it's the person not the gun" people are on the right track without knowing it. After all the subject is, and always has been, the question of guns-crime in the USA. So, if someone were to prove that every citizen in Tramtaria has a gun but there has never been anyone murderd with a firearm ... it would be completly irrelevant.

The subject is "Guns in the hands of Americans" and the unbelievably high frequency of mass shootings by both criminal and non-criminal Americans. Yes, it is the person not the gun that kills, and Americans ought to be the last people on the face of the earth to have guns. The American murder statisics speak for themselves.

[tallyho]

Denny Crain wrote:

<quoted text>Depends on what went on before he came to you. If he had shot 5 people already you knew your turn was coming so why not try to fight back

let me guess this isn't dirty Harry ... did I shoot 5 or 6 if he shoot at you 5 times and you are still breathing , that is your lucky day ...

[lil-wolfie]

tallyho..there has been times where the person being threatened has a chance to stop the person comminting the crime in some way or another.even if meant takeing the weapon from the person.i admit that rarely turns out that way.but it does all the same.

[tallyho]

Force Majeure wrote:

<quoted text>
No, it's no joke. All of the discussions about banning guns are about the concensus of gun controll in the U.S.
As usually is the case, the American pro-gun buffoonery starts in with "it's the person, not the gun ..... bla, bla, bla". Then comes the smoke-screen BS about the gun/murder ratio in Tramtaria (or some other country) which is meant to prove that guns themselves are not the problem - therefore everyone in the U.S.(it is argued) should have the right to own firearms. But that's a red herring.
The upshot is that the "it's the person not the gun" people are on the right track without knowing it. After all the subject is, and always has been, the question of guns-crime in the USA. So, if someone were to prove that every citizen in Tramtaria has a gun but there has never been anyone murderd with a firearm ... it would be completly irrelevant.
The subject is "Guns in the hands of Americans" and the unbelievably high frequency of mass shootings by both criminal and non-criminal Americans. Yes, it is the person not the gun that kills, and Americans ought to be the last people on the face of the earth to have guns. The American murder statisics speak for themselves.

lim get a life drop this act , Christ we can ban you ,easier than guns and look here you are any how .....

[milwaukee69]

au contraire wrote:

<quoted text>Maybe if you were smart enough to look at all violent deaths instead of just shootings your would know the difference. Do we have teach you children everything?

That's not what you said. But I'll give you the idiot's benefit of the doubt.

Prove it huckleberry.

Like I said, I have the Tribune right in front of me.