Dog owner pleads guilty in sheep attack

By WZZM-TV Grand Rapids HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, MI -- The owner of two dogs that attacked a herd of sheep in Ottawa county pleaded guilty to multiple charges. Full Story
MrBill

Bronx, NY

#1 Jan 19, 2007
What kind of monster is this young woman?

This is an absolute horror! Society must be protected from such an evil being. Put her away for a long, long time.

“snoringdogs(at)h otmail(dot)com”

Since: Dec 06

91214

#2 Jan 19, 2007
MrBill wrote:
What kind of monster is this young woman?
This is an absolute horror! Society must be protected from such an evil being. Put her away for a long, long time.
she's a monster because she didn't raise her animals right?
MrBill

Bronx, NY

#3 Jan 19, 2007
MamaGorilla wrote:
<quoted text>
she's a monster because she didn't raise her animals right?

Raise?
" A police investigation showed the two pit-bull type dogs entered a fenced area and killed eight sheep and wounded six others at a farm on 120th Ave. on Jan. 7. "

“snoringdogs(at)h otmail(dot)com”

Since: Dec 06

91214

#4 Jan 19, 2007
MrBill wrote:
<quoted text>
Raise?
" A police investigation showed the two pit-bull type dogs entered a fenced area and killed eight sheep and wounded six others at a farm on 120th Ave. on Jan. 7. "
okay, so "raise' isn't the word - "restrain"? the temperment of the dogs doesn't make the owner a monster. she should have picked a better way to contain them, yeah, but just OWNING the pits doesn't make her a bad person.
Jill M

El Dorado Springs, MO

#5 Jan 19, 2007
Ok, can anyone explain why this owner of these 2 dogs was charged with 2 counts of having a dog at large? Because I thought it was okay for you to let your dogs run loose, at least that was the case last year when a property owner shot a dog that was allowed to run loose on his property. The law went after the property owner, not the dog owner! The dog owner was not charged with dogs at large!!! What is the difference between these two cases?
MrBill

Bronx, NY

#6 Jan 21, 2007
Jill M wrote:
Ok, can anyone explain why this owner of these 2 dogs was charged with 2 counts of having a dog at large? Because I thought it was okay for you to let your dogs run loose, at least that was the case last year when a property owner shot a dog that was allowed to run loose on his property. The law went after the property owner, not the dog owner! The dog owner was not charged with dogs at large!!! What is the difference between these two cases?
Is this a trick question?

Level 5

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#7 Jan 2, 2014
This is such a horrible story!
Puddy

Hudsonville, MI

#8 Jan 14, 2014
Spirit67_ wrote:
This is such a horrible story!
IMHO - Dogs Bite!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Sarah Palin Said 3 min campaign 3
Add a Word, Ruin a Movie (Oct '13) 7 min No Condiments 3,296
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 15 min dirtclod 116,547
Do you have a Topix crush? (Jun '11) 21 min ---Word Woman--- 5,522
BAN(N) the P0STER Above you !!! (Feb '14) 29 min dragoon70056 1,949
I Like..... (Mar '14) 30 min Harrison Freebird 250
Big dawg 31 min Princess Hey 537
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 37 min Times are a Changing 146,877
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 1 hr LOST IN MISSISSIPPI 36,425
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 1 hr Sublime1 20,026
Navy 4 on trial for bizarre sexual assault 3 hr Shirvell s Shrivel 3
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Weird People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••