Should Americans be limited to two children per family?

Created by Illustrated Man on May 25, 2012

286 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

First Prev
of 29
Next Last

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1 May 25, 2012
I should think not! lol

“...next up will be....”

Since: Jun 08

...Christmas!...ho ho ho yo...

#2 May 25, 2012
We need more taxpayers....
Just Stating Facts

United States

#3 May 25, 2012
Liberals should be limited to NO children. That way, stupidity won't have a chance to further itself.

“I'm not listening.”

Level 9

Since: Feb 10

Coxsackie, NY

#5 May 25, 2012
3 yes, Octomom should be strung up by her... well you get the picture.

“...next up will be....”

Since: Jun 08

...Christmas!...ho ho ho yo...

#6 May 25, 2012
Farzad Houshmand wrote:
<quoted text>
lol yeah sure old sam,, you have manys possible taxpayer and good citisens and possible they become something good but usa and many more westrn countrys kill them, is called abortions. you kills so manys you need silly immagrants
Don't forget the death penalty....

“Never summon "Anything" ....”

Level 7

Since: Feb 11

..... you can't banish, lol

#7 May 25, 2012
Only if they can't feed them ..... indiscriminate breeding.
Sorry, that sounds harsh.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#8 May 25, 2012
Fish_sticks wrote:
Only if they can't feed them ..... indiscriminate breeding.
Sorry, that sounds harsh.
I would think that most of the babies born were from indiscriminate breeding! That and alcohol.lol

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#10 May 25, 2012
A Romney administration might decree the opposite given that white births are now second to minority births. Those Mormons love big families....

“Yum Chocolate!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#11 May 25, 2012
OK what a scary question. Makes me think of the movie Population 436. yikes!lol

“Maiden of Mayhem”

Since: May 08

OMFUG

#12 May 25, 2012
Only poor people. No one likes poor people, especially the U.S. government.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#13 May 25, 2012
I come from a family of seven kids. Irish-catholic buddies of mine had 12 and 14 in their families. You do that now and you get a TV show.

“I'm not listening.”

Level 9

Since: Feb 10

Coxsackie, NY

#14 May 25, 2012
victoria1 wrote:
Only poor people. No one likes poor people, especially the U.S. government.
I hate to get into heavy thinking on offbeat, but I know you can handle it. Global population has gotten out of control, More land used for cemeteries and cities than for food plots. It really is hitting the breaking point.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#15 May 25, 2012
The World's population can fit comfortably in Texas
As a whole (water included) Texas has a square footage of about 7,488, 166,118,400.

The current world population is in the neighborhood of 6.8 billion.(with an estimated growth of about 4 billion in the next 50 years)

Divide the current world population into the square footage of Texas results in each person of the world having over 1000 (1089 to be closer to exact) square feet to himself or herself.

(An interesting fact I ran across the other day)

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#16 May 26, 2012
Chatty Kathy wrote:
OK what a scary question. Makes me think of the movie Population 436. yikes!lol
Checked out the trailer on utube. Looks like a real good movie.

Right up my alley.TY:)
Mikey

Charlottesville, VA

#17 May 26, 2012
At this point it would probably be a good idea to only allow 2 kids. And unless both parents are educated and employed they shouldn't be allowed any kids. When these lazy uneducated people have kids it creates a burden on those who do work and support their family. No one should have to support someone else's kids because the parents are to stupid or lazy to take care of their own.

“No time like the present”

Since: Jul 08

to make it happen!

#18 May 26, 2012
Illustrated Man wrote:
The World's population can fit comfortably in Texas
As a whole (water included) Texas has a square footage of about 7,488, 166,118,400.
The current world population is in the neighborhood of 6.8 billion.(with an estimated growth of about 4 billion in the next 50 years)
Divide the current world population into the square footage of Texas results in each person of the world having over 1000 (1089 to be closer to exact) square feet to himself or herself.
(An interesting fact I ran across the other day)
Of course, all that fuzzy math doesn't take into account the needed infrastructure to support those people. ANd without that, it barely warrants a sidebar.

“No time like the present”

Since: Jul 08

to make it happen!

#19 May 26, 2012
I don't care how many kids people have as long as they can care for them on their own dime.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#20 May 26, 2012
Mikey wrote:
At this point it would probably be a good idea to only allow 2 kids. And unless both parents are educated and employed they shouldn't be allowed any kids. When these lazy uneducated people have kids it creates a burden on those who do work and support their family. No one should have to support someone else's kids because the parents are to stupid or lazy to take care of their own.
I wish there were TEN posters like you. There are a hundred. Ten wouldn't embarrass America so much.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#21 May 26, 2012
Dr_Dirty wrote:
I don't care how many kids people have as long as they can care for them on their own dime.
I agree with you. I'm one of 7 and I'm next to the baby so if that was a law back when I wouldn't be here.

I do think many on assitance should at least be discouraged to stop having so many children when they can't feed them.

And were not China yet..but think about this, If that would be allowed only two children per then what if more females were being born than males. Would we start killing our babies to make it even?

This could possibly open up a whole new can of worms....

“No time like the present”

Since: Jul 08

to make it happen!

#22 May 26, 2012
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> I agree with you. I'm one of 7 and I'm next to the baby so if that was a law back when I wouldn't be here.
I do think many on assitance should at least be discouraged to stop having so many children when they can't feed them.
And were not China yet..but think about this, If that would be allowed only two children per then what if more females were being born than males. Would we start killing our babies to make it even?
This could possibly open up a whole new can of worms....
Yeah, it seems pretty far-fetched but every time I think we couldn't possibly pass more infringements on our freedoms another stupid law comes along.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 29
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 min SobieskiSavedEurope 128,027
Bill Cosby 4 min NinaRocks 268
Whatcha' doing? (Apr '12) 15 min SLY WEST 7,192
ozzie = pie? (Nov '13) 15 min Yes 19
How's your weather today? (Mar '12) 18 min SLY WEST 5,092
Word goes to the Movies (Nov '08) 21 min whatimeisit 14,094
blame it on....??? (Aug '13) 36 min SLY WEST 28
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 39 min wichita-rick 24,062
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr wichita-rick 151,192
Ferguson Grand Jury Reaches Decision 1 hr Mega Monster 500
Internal Server Errors 3 hr TALLYHO 8541 40

Weird People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE