Colorado Man Offers President Obama Pot

Colorado Man Offers President Obama Pot

There are 59 comments on the KMCX-FM Ogallala story from Jul 9, 2014, titled Colorado Man Offers President Obama Pot. In it, KMCX-FM Ogallala reports that:

President Obama did not say "yes," but he also did not say "no" when asked by a man in a Colorado bar Tuesday night if he wanted to smoke marijuana.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KMCX-FM Ogallala.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last

“.WHERE DID”

Since: May 14

THAT POST GO

#1 Jul 9, 2014
now where in the hell did I get the idea that legalized pot was for personal use.....not to be passed around
Wholly Silicon Wafer

Philadelphia, PA

#3 Jul 9, 2014
He just quit nicotine, reportedly with some input on the matter from the First Lady, so I doubt he wants to replace that tar with what you get from joints.

(Even if most people this side of the Willie Nelson tracks don't smoke one or two packs of joints per day, meaning much less tar overall than cigarettes provide.)

“Rope Swingin'”

Level 8

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#4 Jul 9, 2014
Judging by his performance, I'm pretty sure he's been doin' wake and bakes his whole time in office.
Far Away

Anchorage, AK

#5 Jul 9, 2014
The offer probably brought back fond memories of his Larry Sinclair days.
Wholly Silicon Wafer

Philadelphia, PA

#6 Jul 9, 2014
Sublime1 wrote:
Judging by his performance, I'm pretty sure he's been doin' wake and bakes his whole time in office.
Whether you like what's happening or do not, he can string complex sentences together 99.99% of the time, teleprompter or off the cuff.

That is hard to do when speaking in public, or even in private. He cannot be baked in any serious way.

And compare that to his predecessor, whose apparent alcohol poisoning resulted in more verbal gaffes than somewhat lovable Gerald Ford had physical ones - a shocking standard.

“Rope Swingin'”

Level 8

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#7 Jul 9, 2014
Wholly Silicon Wafer wrote:
<quoted text>
He cannot be baked in any serious way.
sar·casm
/&#712;sär&#716;kaz &#601;m/
noun
noun: sarcasm; plural noun: sarcasms
the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.
Farm Assist

Huntington, NY

#8 Jul 9, 2014
Obama was too strung out on Oxycodone to want any pot.......
Wholly Silicon Wafer

Philadelphia, PA

#9 Jul 9, 2014
Sublime1 wrote:
<quoted text>
sar·casm
/&#712;sär&#716;kaz &#601;m/
noun
noun: sarcasm; plural noun: sarcasms
the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.
So in your sarcasm or otherwise you have no particular complaint about Obama as President....

I suspect I read your post correctly enough.

“Rope Swingin'”

Level 8

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#10 Jul 9, 2014
Yes, no complaints at all, except that he lied to people and told them under the ACA they could keep their doctor and insurance if they liked it (he knew that wasn't true at the time he spoke those words), to enacting policies that have encouraged 40-50 thousand illegal immigrant children to come to our country without a parent (which he now wants 3 billion dollars to deal with ... me thinks he should start by emptying his bank account) to everything is George Bush's fault, to nothing is his fault or anyone in his administration's fault, to "the list goes on and on."

REally wtf has the guy done in office, other than make my and many other people's healthcare costs go up so other people's heathcare costs could go down?

But hey, he's a good speaker, as you so intelligently pointed out. So are good con artists. That's really important.
Wholly Silicon Wafer

Philadelphia, PA

#11 Jul 9, 2014
Sublime1 wrote:
Yes, no complaints at all, except
So you have the usual litany of deranged complaints.

So your assertion that he must be impaired in some way was actually genuine, not sarcastic. You meant it. Something has impaired Obama to generate all the imaginary complaints about him.

Okay, tee baggrz?

Whereas I'm not being sarcastic when I say d.W.i. Bush was evidently impaired...as evidenced merely by his unending verbal gaffes, not to mention the total wreckage he made of the Middle East and the economy.(Although he had a lot of help on wrecking the economy, to be fair about it.)
Enzo 69

Guangzhou, China

#12 Jul 9, 2014
Sublime1 wrote:
Yes, no complaints at all, except that he lied to people and told them under the ACA they could keep their doctor and insurance if they liked it (he knew that wasn't true at the time he spoke those words), to enacting policies that have encouraged 40-50 thousand illegal immigrant children to come to our country without a parent (which he now wants 3 billion dollars to deal with ... me thinks he should start by emptying his bank account) to everything is George Bush's fault, to nothing is his fault or anyone in his administration's fault, to "the list goes on and on."
REally wtf has the guy done in office, other than make my and many other people's healthcare costs go up so other people's heathcare costs could go down?
But hey, he's a good speaker, as you so intelligently pointed out. So are good con artists. That's really important.
"me thinks"??? LOL! Perhaps you doth protest too much?

Thank God we've got your wife running around doing chest compressions on people whose guts are hanging out. Or, have you amended that story since?

“Rope Swingin'”

Level 8

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#13 Jul 9, 2014
Wholly Silicon Wafer wrote:
<quoted text>
So you have the usual litany of deranged complaints.
Why are they deranged? Do you possess the mental faculty to explain why you feel that or can you only use conclusory statements?
Wholly Silicon Wafer wrote:
<quoted text>
So your assertion that he must be impaired in some way was actually genuine, not sarcastic. You meant it. Something has impaired Obama to generate all the imaginary complaints about him.
Why do you feel you would know how I meant that better than I? Oh, I know that answer to that; you are a know it all, right?
Wholly Silicon Wafer wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, tee baggrz?
How about instead of insults, you humor me and try to explain why my complaints are deranged? You know … try having an intelligent conversation. You can’t do that, can you?
Wholly Silicon Wafer wrote:
<quoted text>Whereas I'm not being sarcastic when I say d.W.i. Bush was evidently impaired...as evidenced merely by his unending verbal gaffes, not to mention the total wreckage he made of the Middle East and the economy.(Although he had a lot of help on wrecking the economy, to be fair about it.)
I fail to see why when someone complains about Obama people mention Bush as if pointing to another bad President magically transforms Obama into a good President. It’s so dumb, but it must suffice as very compelling logic in liberal circles. Only people with simple minds would find that compelling. It would be like someone who is a fan of Bush defending him by comparing him to Stalin.“Hey, Bush was awesome leader and who cares if he started a useless war …. at least he didn’t institute pogroms, send people to gulags, and create a reign of terror, like Stalin did … I bet you didn’t think of that … clearly, with that in mind, he's an awesome leader, right?!!!”

That is the same logic you liberals use when anyone points out how bad Obama sucks. Whenever someone points out how bad Obama sucks, you dumb dumbs always mention another President, who Obama didn’t even run against, and point out the bad things he did, to make yourself feel better about Obama. Why not compare your Messiah to Stalin to make yourself feel EVEN better about your Messiah?

I bet if you sat on a jury you would find a defendant who robbed a bank not guilty, if a defense attorney said, well at least he didn’t murder someone, like so and so did. Your thought process would be, well, duh, yeah, he didn't murder someone like that other person did, therefore he's not a bank robber, duh!!! That's the same thought process you use when people criticize Obama. Instead of addressing the criticism you mention Bush and something he did, as if this is somehow relevant to the criticism leveled at Obama. Do you even realize how dumb that makes you? Are you 12? I sure hope so, because you have the critical thinking skills of a 12 year old.

****

BTW, I thought G. Bush was a bad President too, but unlike you I possess enough critical thinking skills to realize that G. Bush being a bad President doesn't magically make Obama a good President. The only way comparing the two would be relevant would be if they ran against each other, in which case one could rationalize and say, yeah okay maybe you feel Obama sucks, but given the alternative of having Bush in office, he was the better of two bad choices. Just admit it ... your Messiah blows.
Wholly Silicon Wafer

Philadelphia, PA

#14 Jul 9, 2014
Sublime1 wrote:
<quoted text>
How about instead of insults, you humor me and try to explain why my complaints are deranged?...BTW, I thought G. Bush was a bad President too....
Because I'm not here to humor you.

You claimed you were being "sarcastic," and as I said, no, you meant what you posted about Obama. You listed all the usual baseless and overheated, swift boat quality complaints about him.

That's a big leap to recognize that d.W.i. Bush was a bad President...but then you said, "too," as though there's any comparison at all in the amount of damage each has done to this country and around the world. There is not.
Ozzie

Lafayette, CA

#15 Jul 9, 2014
all these decades.

peace.

http://norml.org/

working to reform marijuana laws.

poke smot !!

~Oz

Petal Power

“It's a New Dawn”

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#16 Jul 9, 2014
A kind gesture from ONE American Citizen to ANOTHER..

What Happens In Colorado STAYS in Colorado!!

;)
Tea Baggrz

Huntington, NY

#17 Jul 10, 2014
Hopefully the pot he offered was laced with "common sense"......

“Rope Swingin'”

Level 8

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#18 Jul 10, 2014
Wholly Silicon Wafer wrote:
<quoted text>
Because I'm not here to humor you.
So you admit that if you attempted to have an intelligent conversation instead of spewing insults you would do so poorly at it that it would humor me. We agree for once.
Wholly Silicon Wafer wrote:
<quoted text>
You claimed you were being "sarcastic," and as I said, no, you meant what you posted about Obama.
If you really think I believed that Obama has done wake and bakes every day he's been in the white house you are even dopier than you’ve already demonstrated yourself to be.
Wholly Silicon Wafer wrote:
<quoted text>
You listed all the usual baseless and overheated, swift boat quality complaints about him.
Why are they baseless and overheated? You can’t tell anyone why that is, can you? All you can do is just say “it is, because I say it is.” You lack the critical thinking and language skills to articulate any reason why you feel this is the case, right?
Wholly Silicon Wafer wrote:
<quoted text>That's a big leap to recognize that d.W.i. Bush was a bad President...but then you said, "too," as though there's any comparison at all in the amount of damage each has done to this country and around the world. There is not.
You miss the point. Even if Bush was a worse President, that doesn’t mean all the criticisms against Obama are invalid. Bush’s follies don’t somehow make Obama’s follies, non-follies. Bush isn't even relevant to the conversation.
Catholic League of Duncey

Philadelphia, PA

#19 Jul 11, 2014
Sublime1 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you admit that if you attempted to have an intelligent conversation
Again, you were not being "sarcastic." I read your initial post correctly enough, as I said earlier. Right from the outset you didn't know and couldn't acknowledge what you were saying. And that indicates everything else that will flow from your keyboard.

There's no need to go through every litany of bizarre, reality impaired, always race tinged complaints from right wingers point by unhinged point every time they come up, particularly regarding the sick Benghazi mini industry. They're recycled Birthers and Swift Boaters pushing that thing.

There are genuine complaints about every President - far fewer about Obama than about that truly impaired Bush, just for a handy comparison.

“Rope Swingin'”

Level 8

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#20 Jul 11, 2014
Catholic League of Duncey wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, you were not being "sarcastic." I read your initial post correctly enough, as I said earlier. Right from the outset you didn't know and couldn't acknowledge what you were saying. And that indicates everything else that will flow from your keyboard.
You lack the reading comprehension skills to read posts correctly. Only a complete dip shyte moron would read my initial post and believe that I actually think Obama wakes up every morning in the white house and hits the bong. You are that effing dumb. You aren’t even fit to have political discussions, young padawan.
Catholic League of Duncey wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no need to go through every litany of bizarre, reality impaired, always race tinged complaints from right wingers point by unhinged point every time they come up, particularly regarding the sick Benghazi mini industry. They're recycled Birthers and Swift Boaters pushing that thing.
I didn’t mention every complaint. I mentioned a few. Why don’t you go through just one of them and explain, using adult words and an adult brain, why it has no merit? You won’t because you can’t. You aren’t intelligent enough. You have the political thought of an adolescent. That’s why you are a card carrying liberal hack. Political parties were made for people like you. That way you can keep it real stupid and the extent of your political thought can be my party and candidate is all good, your party and candidate is all bad, me smart.
Instigator

Charlestown, IN

#21 Jul 11, 2014
If Obonger would have said "yes".... I wonder if the secret service would have had to test the joint? Probably.

Much as expected though, he could get by with it...because the POTUS doesn't get drug tested. That is unless he orders one for himself.

It's somewhat mind boggling to me, that though most of us are subject to random drug testing in the workforce today.... the ONE PERSON that is in command of our nation's nuclear arsenal, isn't.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News With help from goat, wily Clydesdale goes on la... 1 min beatlesinthebog 1
Last Post Wins! (Aug '08) 5 min Red_Forman 146,549
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 6 min It aint necessari... 205,260
JUST SAY SOMETHING. Whatever comes to mind!! (Aug '09) 9 min honeymylove 33,289
Change-one-of-six-letters (Dec '12) 14 min beatlesinthebog 9,151
Alphabetical ways to die (Jul '11) 18 min Cyber Crime Inves... 10,898
Make up your wildest Headline. (Aug '08) 22 min Hoosier Hillbilly 681
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 35 min revilot2 59,953
News new Women bare breasts for gender equality on G... 56 min Knock off purse s... 24
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 3 hr Sharlene45 197,739
More from around the web