Hillary mag cover 'deeply weird'

Jan 23, 2014 Full story: News Radio 710 WPMI-AM 228

That's an understatement. It depicts Hillary as a planet and the type explains that the story is about her "gravitational pull" on the 2016 election.

Full Story

“Happiness comes through giving”

Level 7

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#226 Feb 2, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no, robbery.
and destruction of the will to succeed.
Horsepoop. A leg up can do wonders for the will to succeed.

Level 7

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#227 Feb 2, 2014
IOU wrote:
<quoted text>Of course you don't feel "overtaxed". You probably don't pay any taxes (at least not very much) anyway.
Psssssst! Let me let you in on a little secret. O & co are borrowing the money they're wasting from China. IOW The bill hasn't come due yet, but when it does, you'll be bitching about it like everyone else. I guarantee.
Tune up your gag reflex, or learn about our current strengthening economy.....Fat and uninformed, is no way for you to go through life....

Since: Oct 08

Decatur, GA

#228 Feb 2, 2014
Christaliban wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey jerk, the wealth is created by many people using many resources of the commons. Tax policy from the 1940s to the 1970s was not to "rob" rich people.
Naturally you are unable to address the vast, vast disparity in the rate of increase of income and wealth between the ultra wealthy and everyone else. I don't even think you can understand the concept of "rate of increase" to begin with.
The ultra rich aren't getting that vastly, vastly smarter or harder working or entrepreneurial. They have systematically re jiggered laws to disproportionately benefit themselves.
I got mine....and you ain't getting it.....bedwetter

Since: Oct 08

Decatur, GA

#229 Feb 2, 2014
im pulling for the ultra wealthy, we need more of them, we got plenty of poor people. Poor contribute nothing, they don't pay taxes, yet they consume resources put in by others, they are nothing but leeches, and whatever bad happens to them they should move in with you libs and you can support them......Christaliban, what kind of phony baloney name is that? are you an American, or are you like Michelle, ashamed of your country?
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#230 Feb 2, 2014
Christaliban wrote:
<quoted text>Hey closet case, what is about tee baggrz and an uses?Oops, answered my own question again.
You should probably ask the duckman because he had some strange odd weird comments about body parts! LOLL
Intelligence Report

Wilmington, OH

#231 Feb 2, 2014
inbred Genius wrote:
im pulling for the ultra wealthy, we need more of them, we got plenty of poor people. Poor contribute nothing, they don't pay taxes, yet they consume resources put in by others, they are nothing but leeches, and whatever bad happens to them they should move in with you libs and you can support them......Christaliban, what kind of phony baloney name is that? are you an American, or are you like Michelle, ashamed of your country?
He's too damn stoooopid to be a threat to national security, even though he seems to like the Taliban for some reason. A threat to himself, most definitely, especially if my theory of stupfixiation is ever proven to be valid.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#232 Feb 2, 2014
Defcon 38 wrote:
<quoted text>The only thing I'm worried about is if that f**king b**ch ever gets into a POSition of power again. Hopefully not...
If she gets into the OvalOffice, no investigations of the BenghaziDeception or the Fast&Furious will happen.
got game

Da Nang, Vietnam

#233 Feb 2, 2014
RayOne wrote:
<quoted text>
If she gets into the OvalOffice, no investigations of the BenghaziDeception or the Fast&Furious will happen.
U think-if?;-000h, save yo $ & bitbuy her book!!! ;-000
got game

Da Nang, Vietnam

#234 Feb 2, 2014
inbred Genius wrote:
socialists don't like rich people, unless they are one of them. And they would like to rob rich people of their wealth, for no other reason that to spread the wealth around, like Obama told that plumber. When they run out of rich people to rob, you're next.
so U mints seeBO wil inventin S&R to soupork S&P market r&d?!! ;-00
Islander

United States

#237 Feb 2, 2014
The poor and the rich are both doing fine. It is the middle class who had a war waged by both these groups along with the corrupted government against them who are in danger. Both our political parties need to be douched out of existence. They are both working together and both parties have the same damn goals and ideals.
Islander

Rochester, NY

#242 Feb 2, 2014
Christaliban wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know the data. When there is a vast transfer of wealth from the poor and the middle class - that is, from everyone but the very rich - that doesn't mean poor are "doing fine."
The poor are doing fine. It is the middle class who is being pushed into their financial ranks who are suffering. The Middle class is what is suffering and it is both sides and both political parties who are out to destroy it. It is welfare for the poor and for the corporations that needs to be stopped.
Islander

Rochester, NY

#243 Feb 2, 2014
Christaliban wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know the data. When there is a vast transfer of wealth from the poor and the middle class - that is, from everyone but the very rich - that doesn't mean poor are "doing fine."
The only wealth transfer is from the middle class and it goes to the poor and rich. Plus, add to the fact it is not the governments job, right, or moral responsibility to distribute wealth to any group. Our political party disguised as Two is to blame for creating this mess.
Cat74

Mount Prospect, IL

#245 Feb 2, 2014
That is why Republicans have to find some multi voters, and match the Democrat vote fraud vote for vote in 2016. Nah. We can't do it. We are too honest.
Islander

United States

#247 Feb 2, 2014
Christaliban wrote:
<quoted text>
If your bigoted theory were true then the wealth of the poor would have increased proportionately to that for the very wealthy over the past three decades.
It is simple fact that that is not the case. Not even close.
The government is now distributing wealth upwards, That is the entire point. Yet you deal with complaints about this fact by braying it is not the job of the government to re distribute wealth.
I am aware there are complete kooks running around who think the federal government has not right to levy income taxes. You're evidently one.
Go read a dictionary and learn the definition of the words bigoted and bigotry. I'm not being bigoted at all.
The fact that the poor have not amassed more wealth says nothing. The poor are doing fine in the realm of government subsidies that pay their food, heat, child care, health care, etc... It is impossible to eliminate poverty. The Middle class is what is suffering. Therefor creating more members of the poor society. That is the problem. That is the true growth in poverty. It is how it has always been whenever there is a middle class. The rich view them as the same as poor and beneath them. They see them as the threat to their wealth and their positions in society. At the same time the poor see them as part of the rich and become jealous of their ability to rise out of poverty. The poor seeing them as rich feel they deserve some of what they got. The poor begin to demand the government to ease their burden as if that is it's function. Meanwhile the rich use their influence to sway the situation to drain those resources from the middle class in order to secure their wealth and eliminate their perceived threat. Both sides squeeze the middle class. The thing that makes the least sense is the poor having a hand in it, are helping to create a situation where they can never rise to the middle class. Where does it all start? With the government being allowed to use policy and taxes to control and influence the flow of REAL money between people within its borders, instead of the flow of money in and out of its borders. The poor and the rich both make equally absurd demands on the government and the rest of society. Both are also taking way to much power from society and giving it the government
Islander

United States

#249 Feb 2, 2014
Christaliban wrote:
<quoted text>
You are clearly bigoted against poor people. What you claimed about them is not true. You make the false claim out of bigotry.
The false claim you made is that the poor have been getting more and more wealth, commensurate with the increasing concentration of wealth the very rich have been experiencing.
The fact that the poor sometimes get government benefits does not mean their wealth has been increasing at epic rates since the 70s. All the stats show this.
Welfare and food stamps, just for starters, have actually been cut over the past decades.
I swear talking to tee baggrz and racists and bigots is like talking to mollusks. The level of basic comprehension is so very low. You can't understand or envision a simple chart of wealth for the various income groups over time: The line for the poor and for the middle class are nearly flat. The curve for the rich goes up like a hockey stick blade. Even cretins can research the facts here and see this is the case. It's unwilling cretins who can't do that.
Brother your reading comprehension is just as bad as your understanding of what a bigot is. I never said the wealth of the poor has increased. What I'm saying is the poor have more entitlements and hand-outs that they really have not much to worry about. Regular welfare and corporate welfare both need to be eliminated.
Islander

United States

#251 Feb 2, 2014
Christaliban wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what you said.
The trajectory for the poor and for the middle class are about the same relative to the very rich.
There is no real disparity between the poor and the middle class in terms of the wealth.
The rate of increase of the wealth for the already rich is astonishing.
Again, it is simple for a normal intelligence to picture three lines on a graph. And that's what the stats show.
So perhaps you think a flatline in wealth for the poor is "doing fine," but the fact is the middle class is also a flatline...or slightly better than flatlining.
Yet you say the middle class is being creamed, and the poor are not. You are confused.
And you maintain this delusion, despite the easily available facts, because you have a prejudice against the poor. I suppose your delusion could be random, but that's not likely given your nutty idea that public assistance for the poor is just as odious as is corporate welfare. It is not just as odious - because the corporations have so much money to start with....
You should work on your cognitive skills and introspection. My reading skills are fine, Cletus.
Yes they are. They are both equally destructive and both create hurdles for personal gain for members of society. Both are part of the same game. Government has no right or responsibility to engage in any kind of welfare. It is all immoral and counter-productive no matter who it is for. Not in free society. An end to the Federal Reserve and a return to real money.
I wouldn't expect a hate filled and hot-headed little bugger like you to get that though. You just have to hide little insults in everything you say don't you? That's you compensating. That shows how threatened you feel by someone my conflicting input to your views, and how you really don't know how to properly challenge the one presented to you with yours. So you need to compare me to an inbred, slack-jawed, uneducated and ignorant, backwoods yokel. Instead of thinking about said statement and how even some of the data you use for claim still can also support mine. You just write the person off as less of a person than you and not to your superior intellect. Not because you are so smart and so empirically correct, but because you are to weak or absent minded to think.

Since: Oct 08

Atlanta, GA

#252 Feb 3, 2014
christalbum has only been on topix a few days, hes barely got500 posts...hes; just another in a long line of libs who shows up to tell us the error of our ways, do as I say, not as I do. He reminds me of Harvey, maybe Harvey recruited him?

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#255 Feb 3, 2014
A perfect evening of Cake&Circus'.
3 Lemmons

Lebanon, OH

#256 Feb 3, 2014
Christaliban wrote:
<quoted text>
Right wing filth never speak to the point.
That's because we're too busy WORKING so that left wing filth (such as yourself) can spend all of their time sucking off their imperious "leader".

Good luck with Shillary. Hopefully you'll get exactly what you deserve...
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#257 Feb 3, 2014
inbred Genius wrote:
..hes; just another in a long line of libs who shows up to tell us the error of our ways,?
At least that is easy to do. No experience necessary!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 1 min Jennifer Renee 9,789
last word/first word. (Apr '12) 2 min Nobody 2 Special 5,557
Things you say while driving (Mar '14) 5 min SLY WEST 750
Rest in Peace, Spock 5 min -badboy- 208
Last 3 Letters into 3 new words. (Dec '08) 6 min Nobody 2 Special 56,110
Add a word and drop a word (Jan '14) 6 min carr 2,513
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 7 min JM_Brazil 149,507
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 12 min LOST IN MISSISSIPPI 39,322
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 18 min CJ Rocker 157,947
Name a smell you love to smell! (Jan '14) 1 hr SLY WEST 798
Denny Crain's Place (May '10) 1 hr harleyhoney8 17,911
More from around the web