Who Won the First Debate?

[tallyho]

so what ?? don't you ever get tired of whining

[Man from Atlantis]

Obama target by Levite Priest

President Barak Obama is an Left Democrat which mean he side Aryan, Vampire and Watchers but there a problem? Pure Aryan, Watcher and Vampire are B Rh negative or Aryan Vampire Sun Race. These Zerubbabel and Virgin Mary race; however Barak Obama is AB Rh negative, Just like President Clinton and George Bush all who were target with man made viruses causes cancerous mode and Leukemia. Semitic people are behind it all they have enough man made viruses to kill everyone in this country and they target our US president regularly. They target me too but if die the will be hell to pay and Lilith will see to that.

B Rh negative is the Virgin Mary or Lilith Sumeria Aryan race or Vampire or Gnostic Christians, Annakki Sumeria, Persia and Tamil people and Aztec and Mayan Sun priest.

AB Rh negative is Joseph and Levite priest Babylonian Semitic race or Werewolves or Pharasees

Barak Obama was target by man made viruses Because he was AB Rh negative so he was a traitor Pharasee or Levite Priest or Semitic priest which Levite, Brahmin and Wahabbee Imans!

Levite Priest have targeted President Bush, Clinton and Obama with man made viruses to influence US police toward Israel in the Middle and they been doing so since creation of Israel and may been responsible JFK Addision Disease severity while in the White House.

You just don't know just how far religious conservatives will go to influence US policy in this Country. They are dirty!

[Man from Atlantis]

President Clinton and Obama or both AB Rh negative and according their they are suppose be Religious Conservative like AB Rh negative Levite Priest or Joseph family.

No like B Rh negative Liberal like the Virgin Mary and Zerubabbel family.

George Bush is AB Rh negative and An religious Conservative and the Levite priest still while he was in office with cancerous moes.

[Kate]

Man from Atlantis wrote:

President Clinton and Obama or both AB Rh negative and according their they are suppose be Religious Conservative like AB Rh negative Levite Priest or Joseph family.
No like B Rh negative Liberal like the Virgin Mary and Zerubabbel family.
George Bush is AB Rh negative and An religious Conservative and the Levite priest still while he was in office with cancerous moes.

Are you playing Dueling Banjos right now? I can almost picture it..

[tallyho]

info:

After what was widely considered a clear-cut victory during the first presidential debate last Wednesday, Romney stormed ahead of President Obama by 2 percentage points in a national poll released yesterday, winning support from 49 percent of voters nationwide, compared to Obama’s 47.

“It’s a real indicator that Governor Romney had a good debate and has at least for the short term changed the perception of the race,” said pollster Scott Rasmussen.

Going into the debate, Obama led by two points, according to Rasmussen’s daily presidential tracking poll.

[tallyho]

LOST IN MISSISSIPPI wrote:

<quoted text>just havin lunch with friends

I keep skipping over this , but I can not resist since you have
PMed , chased me , used several IDs to harass me . so here it goes ...

you are having lunch with Animal Crackers ???

[LOST IN MISSISSIPPI]

tallyho wrote:

so what ?? don't you ever get tired of whining

did you say that in your cheney voice?

[LOST IN MISSISSIPPI]

tallyho wrote:

info:
After what was widely considered a clear-cut victory during the first presidential debate last Wednesday, Romney stormed ahead of President Obama by 2 percentage points in a national poll released yesterday, winning support from 49 percent of voters nationwide, compared to Obama’s 47.
“It’s a real indicator that Governor Romney had a good debate and has at least for the short term changed the perception of the race,” said pollster Scott Rasmussen.
Going into the debate, Obama led by two points, according to Rasmussen’s daily presidential tracking poll.

"Romney stormed ahead of President Obama by 2 percentage points"

STORMED ahead by TWO POINTS

thats hilsrous

[Hunglo]

Always Wary wrote:

Romney won it, Obama seemed to be ... distracted.
So it was more of a default win. Obama will probably do better in the next two, after he practices more.

Or if they allow him a teleprompter.

[LOST IN MISSISSIPPI]

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
I keep skipping over this , but I can not resist since you have
PMed , chased me , used several IDs to harass me . so here it goes ...
you are having lunch with Animal Crackers ???

what about your gray box trolling pops

you have skipped over that too

lmao@u pops

[tallyho]

storm is good word as that is a 5 point swing in one outing ,,,, 5 point swing

[ObamaPhone]

Naturally Wired wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, if there gonna be any riots homie, you wouldn't mind picking me up a 50 inch high def tv and sending it my way? Some things way cheaper in the US than here.
Thanks, appreciate it.

Otay! You vote Obama to stay in da pezidintt Otay?

[LOST IN MISSISSIPPI]

tallyho wrote:

storm is good word as that is a 5 point swing in one outing ,,,, 5 point swing

Margin of error is ±2 percentage points

but if its all ya got run with it

[arctic]

Chilli J wrote:

<quoted text>
So far, so good. But CCS has two major hurdles. First, it consumes energy--a lot of it. While estimates vary, a coal-fired power plant would have to burn roughly 25 percent more coal to handle carbon sequestration while producing the same amount of electricity. That would mean a vast expansion in mining, transportation costs and byproducts such as fly ash.
But that's the easy part. The harder challenge would be transporting and burying all of this high-pressure CO2. American Electric Power recently began a CCS project at its Mountaineer Plant in West Virginia. The operation captures a few hundred tons of CO2 a day. That's a start--but a typical 500-megawatt power plant produces about 10,000 tons daily. Collectively, America's coal-fired power plants generate 1.5 billion tons per year. Capturing that would mean filling 30 million barrels with liquid CO2 every single day--about one and a half times the volume of crude oil the country consumes. It took roughly a century to build the infrastructure we use to distribute petroleum products. Could we build an even bigger CCS infrastructure of pumps, pipelines and wells quickly enough to hit the ambitious targets the climate bill envisions? Serious plans to engineer--much less finance--such a vast project aren't even on the table.
Here's a final problem: We don't know if the gas will stay buried. We could easily spend hundreds of billions injecting CO2 into the earth only to have it start leaking out again in a few decades. None of this means that CCS is impossible to achieve. But it is a dangerous gamble to assume that it will become technically and economically feasible any time soon."
So the technology sadly isn't there yet to make coal "clean." Yeah, if I were Mitt or you, pushing "clean coal", I'd be embarrassed too. LOL As much as some of us want to be able to use our massive coal deposits now and to stop funding bad guys who hate us, the devil's in the details. It's okay! I'm hoping you just didn't know any better.

Your posts were informative as well
as true. I'd like to add that burying
tons of toxic gas and expecting it not
to leak would be an idiotic thing to
even think about.

Where would we even bury it?

[Ferrerman]

arctic wrote:

<quoted text>
Your posts were informative as well
as true. I'd like to add that burying
tons of toxic gas and expecting it not
to leak would be an idiotic thing to
even think about.
Where would we even bury it?

Mitt Romney has several homes...

[tallyho]

LOST IN MISSISSIPPI wrote:

<quoted text>Margin of error is ±2 percentage points
but if its all ya got run with it

you are right it is a 7 point swing .... but you should see who wrote the article and argue with them and stop being an internet ass

[tallyho]

Ferrerman wrote:

<quoted text>Mitt Romney has several homes...

well you can't count 1600 Penn Ave yet

[tallyho]

geno

[Ferrerman]

How U Doin 80 wrote:

Does it really matter who wins anymore? Does it? It will be more of the same regardless who is in the WH.
What do you think will change in 4 years if say, Romney wins? All this fighting about who is better is ridiculous. Nothing major will change like everywhere wants to believe based on what the politicians say and promise.
It's all just a big pissing contest and the results are the same in the end. All politicians LIE. Majority of promises are LIES. All just to be elected and I for one am tired of it.
IMO.

Well, healthcare would change. No doubt wages and workers rights. Taxes too. How does a deficit get reduced by reducing revenue? And added 2 trillion to an already bloated military budget? Where's that cash come from? 12% of PBS's budget comes from the Federal government. That's bird feed... Romeny's still selling *trickle down* while Obama is pushing sharing the wealth via wages. Which works for you?

[arctic]

I'm all for putting our focus back on
the U.S.

There are many important things we need
to work on. Such as poverty, infrastructure,
health care, education, affordable housing
and the like.

Stop exporting jobs and importing goods.