Sandy Hook Truthers

Posted in the Weird Forum

Comments (Page 87)

Showing posts 1,721 - 1,740 of2,090
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1978
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what he's saying. And that's the problem.
People like him are more worried about setting limits on law-abiding citizens, instead of trying to come up for solutions for limiting access to guns for the criminal element.
I think thats what you think but All OF US are for 2nd Amendment Rights and don't want to take guns away from law abiding citizens like myself who is a gun owner.. Just want to make it harder for criminals to get their hands on these guns...

Why is that so hard to understand????

With rights comes responsibilities...

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1979
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Now I know why you welcomed me back....

Pulling my piggies again??

“WE WON TOPIX! YAY!”

Since: Jun 09

Schaumburg, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1980
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> I think thats what you think but All OF US are for 2nd Amendment Rights and don't want to take guns away from law abiding citizens like myself who is a gun owner.. Just want to make it harder for criminals to get their hands on these guns...
Why is that so hard to understand????
With rights comes responsibilities...
They IMMEDIATELY go to "taking guns away" whenever background checks or other control is mentioned. Very telling.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1981
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ferrerman wrote:
<quoted text>They IMMEDIATELY go to "taking guns away" whenever background checks or other control is mentioned. Very telling.
I've never heard anyone say they want to take guns, just limit them if possible to criminals..

Are you being a Liberal today??:)

“If it ain't broke don't fix it”

Level 9

Since: Jul 09

Abell, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1982
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> I think thats what you think but All OF US are for 2nd Amendment Rights and don't want to take guns away from law abiding citizens like myself who is a gun owner.. Just want to make it harder for criminals to get their hands on these guns...
Why is that so hard to understand????
With rights comes responsibilities...
Ferrerman, as far as I can, has never advocated that point, as he is quick to point when innocent people who happend to be gun owners are murdered as though they are the criminals.

“If it ain't broke don't fix it”

Level 9

Since: Jul 09

Portsmouth, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1983
Apr 2, 2013
 
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
Now I know why you welcomed me back....
Pulling my piggies again??
Hah! I was about to tell you to stop pulling mine. Then it dawned on me that I''m bald. LoL.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1984
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ferrerman, as far as I can, has never advocated that point, as he is quick to point when innocent people who happend to be gun owners are murdered as though they are the criminals.
I do the same thing to prove a point. The point being....just because you're armed doesn't mean you're safe..

Thats why the whole arming America spew doesn't make alot of sense to me.. Look how many gun owners get killed...

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1985
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hah! I was about to tell you to stop pulling mine. Then it dawned on me that I''m bald. LoL.
I'm just going to pull your ear and drag you to the woodshed!!

NO!!!! I'm not going to pull your finger either.... SO DON'T ASK!!:)

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Level 7

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1986
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> I've never heard anyone say they want to take guns, just limit them if possible to criminals..
Are you being a Liberal today??:)
"If I could,had the power,I'd say Mr. amd Mrs. America. Turn 'em in,all of them. EVERY gun in America." :Sen. Diane Fienstien,(D) Calif. 1996-7.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1987
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

okimar wrote:
<quoted text>"If I could,had the power,I'd say Mr. amd Mrs. America. Turn 'em in,all of them. EVERY gun in America." :Sen. Diane Fienstien,(D) Calif. 1996-7.
Okimar,

I think you lay in wait for me to post so you can fight with me.

Is this true?

So because one person said this you think this is how all of us who want some new laws feel??

If you do lets go back to when Wayne Lapew wanted Background Checks.. see that works both ways my friend..

“WE WON TOPIX! YAY!”

Since: Jun 09

Schaumburg, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1988
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> I've never heard anyone say they want to take guns, just limit them if possible to criminals..
Are you being a Liberal today??:)
Yes! AND, i'm back to being a bottom spanker so- watch out! That was just an April Fools joke.

“WE WON TOPIX! YAY!”

Since: Jun 09

Schaumburg, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1989
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ferrerman, as far as I can, has never advocated that point, as he is quick to point when innocent people who happend to be gun owners are murdered as though they are the criminals.
Wrong.

“WE WON TOPIX! YAY!”

Since: Jun 09

Schaumburg, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1990
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

okimar wrote:
<quoted text>"If I could,had the power,I'd say Mr. amd Mrs. America. Turn 'em in,all of them. EVERY gun in America." :Sen. Diane Fienstien,(D) Calif. 1996-7.
ONE SENATOR! LOL!
How'd she do? If you ask around, even the POTUS doesn't have that power. Sheesh.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1991
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ferrerman wrote:
<quoted text>Yes! AND, i'm back to being a bottom spanker so- watch out! That was just an April Fools joke.
Ouch!!! What did I do??:)

“WE WON TOPIX! YAY!”

Since: Jun 09

Schaumburg, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1992
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> Ouch!!! What did I do??:)
You've been very, very good!

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1993
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ferrerman wrote:
<quoted text>You've been very, very good!
( giggles)

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Level 7

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1994
Apr 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text>
Okimar,
I think you lay in wait for me to post so you can fight with me.
Is this true?
So because one person said this you think this is how all of us who want some new laws feel??
If you do lets go back to when Wayne Lapew wanted Background Checks.. see that works both ways my friend..
Just luvs tugging them pigtails.... LOL No,that statement wouldn't matter if it was made by a run of the mill,everyday lib. It was made by a sitting US Senator,in a very influential position. While SHE actually had the grit to say it aloud-and publically,it is a view held by more than a few libs. Luckily they are really outnumbered.

As for La Pierre's statement on B/G checks...so? Bid deal if he was FOR them before he was AGAINST them. THAT position isn't the intellectual property of the libs. Perhaps he still may be in favor of them IF the B/G checks were the end of the crap. But we all know its another baby step. And he decided where HIS line in the sand is.

FYI: Laws are ONLY as good as the people who, 1) Enforce them and 2) Obey them.

“I know where you are,”

Level 8

Since: Jun 08

Right here under my thumb

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1995
Apr 2, 2013
 
dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what he's saying. And that's the problem.
People like him are more worried about setting limits on law-abiding citizens, instead of trying to come up for solutions for limiting access to guns for the criminal element.
You and I both know that ain't gonna' happen without pissing off at least one side of the fence or the other. There is no eliminating the criminal element without addressing gun ownership itself. Simply saying "no guns" ain't gonna' do it either. There are laws (whether you like 'em or not) that govern everything from jet skis to the size of bottled water you buy. It's ALWAYS been like this. It is because 95% of the population - you, me, them, everyone - is irresponsible. Therein lies the rub.

If everything you touched was free, you'd be dead in less than 24 hours - true story bro'.

“If it ain't broke don't fix it”

Level 9

Since: Jul 09

Abell, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1997
Apr 2, 2013
 
GenOmazing wrote:
<quoted text>Ask him what his side is willing to do to save the lives of good people. I bet he won't answer you.
Put you're skirt down lady. I'm not interested. And for god's sake, trim that thing, would ya?

Level 2

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1998
Apr 2, 2013
 
That's probably true. Even I'll admit that after the 9/11 attack occurred, that I was thinking it could have possibly been a conspiracy. I don't believe it was. Lanza was a ticking time bomb that no one could foresee would happen.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1,721 - 1,740 of2,090
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••