“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1978 Apr 2, 2013
dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what he's saying. And that's the problem.
People like him are more worried about setting limits on law-abiding citizens, instead of trying to come up for solutions for limiting access to guns for the criminal element.
I think thats what you think but All OF US are for 2nd Amendment Rights and don't want to take guns away from law abiding citizens like myself who is a gun owner.. Just want to make it harder for criminals to get their hands on these guns...

Why is that so hard to understand????

With rights comes responsibilities...

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1979 Apr 2, 2013
Now I know why you welcomed me back....

Pulling my piggies again??

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#1980 Apr 2, 2013
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> I think thats what you think but All OF US are for 2nd Amendment Rights and don't want to take guns away from law abiding citizens like myself who is a gun owner.. Just want to make it harder for criminals to get their hands on these guns...
Why is that so hard to understand????
With rights comes responsibilities...
They IMMEDIATELY go to "taking guns away" whenever background checks or other control is mentioned. Very telling.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1981 Apr 2, 2013
Ferrerman wrote:
<quoted text>They IMMEDIATELY go to "taking guns away" whenever background checks or other control is mentioned. Very telling.
I've never heard anyone say they want to take guns, just limit them if possible to criminals..

Are you being a Liberal today??:)

“If it ain't broke don't fix it”

Level 9

Since: Jul 09

Arcadia, LA.

#1982 Apr 2, 2013
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> I think thats what you think but All OF US are for 2nd Amendment Rights and don't want to take guns away from law abiding citizens like myself who is a gun owner.. Just want to make it harder for criminals to get their hands on these guns...
Why is that so hard to understand????
With rights comes responsibilities...
Ferrerman, as far as I can, has never advocated that point, as he is quick to point when innocent people who happend to be gun owners are murdered as though they are the criminals.

“If it ain't broke don't fix it”

Level 9

Since: Jul 09

Arcadia, LA.

#1983 Apr 2, 2013
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
Now I know why you welcomed me back....
Pulling my piggies again??
Hah! I was about to tell you to stop pulling mine. Then it dawned on me that I''m bald. LoL.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1984 Apr 2, 2013
dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ferrerman, as far as I can, has never advocated that point, as he is quick to point when innocent people who happend to be gun owners are murdered as though they are the criminals.
I do the same thing to prove a point. The point being....just because you're armed doesn't mean you're safe..

Thats why the whole arming America spew doesn't make alot of sense to me.. Look how many gun owners get killed...

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1985 Apr 2, 2013
dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hah! I was about to tell you to stop pulling mine. Then it dawned on me that I''m bald. LoL.
I'm just going to pull your ear and drag you to the woodshed!!

NO!!!! I'm not going to pull your finger either.... SO DON'T ASK!!:)

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Level 7

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#1986 Apr 2, 2013
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> I've never heard anyone say they want to take guns, just limit them if possible to criminals..
Are you being a Liberal today??:)
"If I could,had the power,I'd say Mr. amd Mrs. America. Turn 'em in,all of them. EVERY gun in America." :Sen. Diane Fienstien,(D) Calif. 1996-7.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1987 Apr 2, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>"If I could,had the power,I'd say Mr. amd Mrs. America. Turn 'em in,all of them. EVERY gun in America." :Sen. Diane Fienstien,(D) Calif. 1996-7.
Okimar,

I think you lay in wait for me to post so you can fight with me.

Is this true?

So because one person said this you think this is how all of us who want some new laws feel??

If you do lets go back to when Wayne Lapew wanted Background Checks.. see that works both ways my friend..

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#1988 Apr 2, 2013
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> I've never heard anyone say they want to take guns, just limit them if possible to criminals..
Are you being a Liberal today??:)
Yes! AND, i'm back to being a bottom spanker so- watch out! That was just an April Fools joke.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#1989 Apr 2, 2013
dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ferrerman, as far as I can, has never advocated that point, as he is quick to point when innocent people who happend to be gun owners are murdered as though they are the criminals.
Wrong.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#1990 Apr 2, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>"If I could,had the power,I'd say Mr. amd Mrs. America. Turn 'em in,all of them. EVERY gun in America." :Sen. Diane Fienstien,(D) Calif. 1996-7.
ONE SENATOR! LOL!
How'd she do? If you ask around, even the POTUS doesn't have that power. Sheesh.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1991 Apr 2, 2013
Ferrerman wrote:
<quoted text>Yes! AND, i'm back to being a bottom spanker so- watch out! That was just an April Fools joke.
Ouch!!! What did I do??:)

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#1992 Apr 2, 2013
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> Ouch!!! What did I do??:)
You've been very, very good!

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1993 Apr 2, 2013
Ferrerman wrote:
<quoted text>You've been very, very good!
( giggles)

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Level 7

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#1994 Apr 2, 2013
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text>
Okimar,
I think you lay in wait for me to post so you can fight with me.
Is this true?
So because one person said this you think this is how all of us who want some new laws feel??
If you do lets go back to when Wayne Lapew wanted Background Checks.. see that works both ways my friend..
Just luvs tugging them pigtails.... LOL No,that statement wouldn't matter if it was made by a run of the mill,everyday lib. It was made by a sitting US Senator,in a very influential position. While SHE actually had the grit to say it aloud-and publically,it is a view held by more than a few libs. Luckily they are really outnumbered.

As for La Pierre's statement on B/G checks...so? Bid deal if he was FOR them before he was AGAINST them. THAT position isn't the intellectual property of the libs. Perhaps he still may be in favor of them IF the B/G checks were the end of the crap. But we all know its another baby step. And he decided where HIS line in the sand is.

FYI: Laws are ONLY as good as the people who, 1) Enforce them and 2) Obey them.

“I know where you are,”

Level 8

Since: Jun 08

Right here under my thumb

#1995 Apr 2, 2013
dragoon70056 wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what he's saying. And that's the problem.
People like him are more worried about setting limits on law-abiding citizens, instead of trying to come up for solutions for limiting access to guns for the criminal element.
You and I both know that ain't gonna' happen without pissing off at least one side of the fence or the other. There is no eliminating the criminal element without addressing gun ownership itself. Simply saying "no guns" ain't gonna' do it either. There are laws (whether you like 'em or not) that govern everything from jet skis to the size of bottled water you buy. It's ALWAYS been like this. It is because 95% of the population - you, me, them, everyone - is irresponsible. Therein lies the rub.

If everything you touched was free, you'd be dead in less than 24 hours - true story bro'.

“If it ain't broke don't fix it”

Level 9

Since: Jul 09

Arcadia, LA.

#1997 Apr 2, 2013
GenOmazing wrote:
<quoted text>Ask him what his side is willing to do to save the lives of good people. I bet he won't answer you.
Put you're skirt down lady. I'm not interested. And for god's sake, trim that thing, would ya?

Level 2

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#1998 Apr 2, 2013
That's probably true. Even I'll admit that after the 9/11 attack occurred, that I was thinking it could have possibly been a conspiracy. I don't believe it was. Lanza was a ticking time bomb that no one could foresee would happen.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 19 min wichita-rick 151,111
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 37 min Chimney1 127,769
Create "short sentences using the last word" (Aug '12) 37 min andet1987 7,349
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 1 hr wichita-rick 24,006
Texas Governor Rick Perry Indicted 1 hr Patrick Star 367
Bill Cosby 1 hr FTW Forever 223
Dog Haus Biergarten in Pasadena serves offbeat ... 2 hr Xstains In Name Only 1
Ferguson Grand Jury Reaches Decision 2 hr TALLYHO 8541 292
Do you have a Topix crush? (Jun '11) 5 hr David0407 8,049

Weird People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE