“So it's not you, It's them?”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#1391 Mar 1, 2013
Twin Balls wrote:
<quoted text>Yes. Like milwaukee69 not liking my name. What a pot he is.
You got the only reply below that I'll give you until you tell us all about yourself. Put up or shut up! If not, we're done here!:)

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/weird/TD8SFCC...

“I know where you are,”

Level 8

Since: Jun 08

Right here under my thumb

#1392 Mar 1, 2013
Twin Balls wrote:
<quoted text>Yes. Like milwaukee69 not liking my name. What a pot he is.
I never said I didn't like your name - on the contrary, I think it's a great name for a 12-year old girl.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#1394 Mar 1, 2013
This used to be a good thread. :(

“Incorrupta fides, nudaque veri”

Level 9

Since: May 07

Vincit qui se vincit

#1395 Mar 1, 2013
Ferrerman wrote:
This used to be a good thread.:(
Awww, need a tissue?

How does it feel?

“Geaux Tigers!”

Level 9

Since: Jun 12

Down on the bayou

#1396 Mar 1, 2013
Ricky F wrote:
<quoted text>Awww, need a tissue?
No. More like a napkin.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#1397 Mar 1, 2013
Well, I was JOKING!

LOL!!

“So it's not you, It's them?”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#1398 Mar 1, 2013
Ferrerman wrote:
This used to be a good thread.:(
This thread was certainly better when the posts were on topic, before it devolved into lame put downs and name-calling. The topic is "Sandy Hook Truthers." Does anyone have an opinion on the thread topic?

“Incorrupta fides, nudaque veri”

Level 9

Since: May 07

Vincit qui se vincit

#1399 Mar 1, 2013
Ferrerman wrote:
Well, I was JOKING!
LOL!!
You little reneger you.

“Geaux Tigers!”

Level 9

Since: Jun 12

Down on the bayou

#1400 Mar 1, 2013
Chilli J wrote:
<quoted text>
Does anyone have an opinion on the thread topic?
Why? Looking to accuse others who don't agree with your point of view of being racist Repulicans?

“I know where you are,”

Level 8

Since: Jun 08

Right here under my thumb

#1401 Mar 1, 2013
Chilli J wrote:
<quoted text>
This thread was certainly better when the posts were on topic, before it devolved into lame put downs and name-calling. The topic is "Sandy Hook Truthers." Does anyone have an opinion on the thread topic?
"Sandy Hook Truthers"

The cable alternatives:

Finding Bigfoot
UFO Hunters
Tom & Jerry hour of fun

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1402 Mar 1, 2013
65007noogard wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? Looking to accuse others who don't agree with your point of view of being racist Repulicans?
Ok, that was me who said some of that.

For that I will apologize.

All I can say is the death of those 20 children hit me hard as it did many. To many deaths from guns for no reason at all. And I still feel something should be done.

I'm a passionate woman and sometimes it's gets the best of me.

If I've offended any of you I'm sorry.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#1403 Mar 1, 2013
Chilli J wrote:
<quoted text>
This thread was certainly better when the posts were on topic, before it devolved into lame put downs and name-calling. The topic is "Sandy Hook Truthers." Does anyone have an opinion on the thread topic?
The conspiracy quacks really didn't have their hearts in the Sandy Hook conspiracy. They are all of the immediate mindset to create conspiracy where there is none. What they did do though is lay the ground *work* though for picking up the *conspiracy* in a few years.

“So it's not you, It's them?”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#1405 Mar 1, 2013
65007noogard wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? Looking to accuse others who don't agree with your point of view of being racist Repulicans?
Accuse? Geez, how very emotive of you? Poor little guy! I'm a MOD. so I consider all CON and LIB extremists with suspicion. If CONs here don't want to be labeled as racists, they might want to stop using racist terms in posts and ducking direct questions. If you think that comment refers to you, it might.

On topic: Are any of you firearm extremists now prepared to allow minimal revisions to the firearm laws to try to avoid the next mass baby killing?

“Geaux Tigers!”

Level 9

Since: Jun 12

Down on the bayou

#1406 Mar 1, 2013
Ohio Cowgirl wrote:
<quoted text> Ok, that was me who said some of that.
For that I will apologize.
All I can say is the death of those 20 children hit me hard as it did many. To many deaths from guns for no reason at all. And I still feel something should be done.
I'm a passionate woman and sometimes it's gets the best of me.
If I've offended any of you I'm sorry.
No worries OC. My apologies as well.

“A *wink* and a smile!!”

Level 8

Since: Apr 10

USA

#1407 Mar 1, 2013
65007noogard wrote:
<quoted text>
No worries OC. My apologies as well.
Thank you..

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Level 7

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#1408 Mar 1, 2013
Chilli J wrote:
<quoted text>
Accuse? Geez, how very emotive of you? Poor little guy! I'm a MOD. so I consider all CON and LIB extremists with suspicion. If CONs here don't want to be labeled as racists, they might want to stop using racist terms in posts and ducking direct questions. If you think that comment refers to you, it might.
On topic: Are any of you firearm extremists now prepared to allow minimal revisions to the firearm laws to try to avoid the next mass baby killing?
What KIND of "minimal" revisions? That seems to be the real question. We've heard all kinds of proposals bandied about. From Cuomo comtemplating confiscation in NY to Fienstien's comprehensive dismantling of the 2nd Amendment. To SOME sensible changes to tighten up purchasing guns and better checks where the mentally ill might try buying. A renewed ban on "assault weapons" is a non-starter. A ban on hi-cap mags won't work,millions of those are already in the public domain. Updating the NCIS system to include those who have been diagnosed/treated for mental health issues need be added to the list of those ineligible to possess/purchase firearms.

“I know where you are,”

Level 8

Since: Jun 08

Right here under my thumb

#1409 Mar 1, 2013
It's funny how this sequester will affect gun manufactures.

The reduced military budget will affect the contracts of every gun manufacture that manufactures guns for the government.

Debt reduction is a bitch, ain't it boys?

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Level 7

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#1410 Mar 1, 2013
milwaukee69 wrote:
It's funny how this sequester will affect gun manufactures.
The reduced military budget will affect the contracts of every gun manufacture that manufactures guns for the government.
Debt reduction is a bitch, ain't it boys?
Not too much. The private sector has been the main purchaser from arms companies for the past few years. The military small arms are mostly contracted thru Colt(M-16/M-4),Bretta USA(pistols) and FNHBN(M-240MG). For ammo the gov't has only a couple aresenals that manufacture small arms ammo,Lakefield and Franklin aresenals. Arms makers like everyone else will feel the pinch but they won't go under from this.
Sandy Hook Exposed

Early, TX

#1411 Mar 1, 2013
The 'gubment' of da-United-States is not and will not be telling the American people the FACTS about what really happened at Sandy Hook, but mostly because what transpired right before the massacre.

Shooting from the hip - Sandy Hook was the target simply because the damn MOTHER had issues with the same women (teachers) that did not accept her. So she RETALIATED against the (school) teachers by using her son as the 'vehicle' to vent her anger and, since he had been reared/raised by her with no MALE role model/father....the 'boy' was constantly being reminded that he was 'less masculine' and thus this attitude in him contributed to many fights with the mother. This of course has been kept hush hush, simply because there's way too many young children who are fatherless and less INADEQUATE.

The stupid mother 'schemed' her devious and diabolical strategy and may have trained, coerced, and eventually incite the boy into anger mode. She may have told him that she would just as well give HER life, since it was over ever since the husband left THEM.....Yeahhh.....Yep, women have always found SOMEONE to blame. Even though it's their own fault and it's the woman who destroys the home, a man can very easily find another person who loves him and makes him his/hers!

Sorry gals, we have you analyzed to the very core and now we just wait as to what better strategy MEN use in order to keep the masses in 'somewhat' control.

Oh BTW she is in hell....I just hope the boy has found with favour in God's eyes. No need to talk about the victims. I'm sure we all know where THEY are!

“Ginger and her humans”

Level 8

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#1414 Mar 1, 2013
LMAO!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CHANGE One letter CHANCE (Sep '08) 12 min beatlesinafog 30,088
Name something you shouldn't do naked .... (Mar '14) 18 min Jenji 337
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 21 min Roxie Darling 26,034
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 21 min beatlesinafog 7,837
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 23 min Dogen 134,698
Create "short sentences using the last word" (Aug '12) 23 min beatlesinafog 7,641
Dog injures Wyoming man in accidental shooting 24 min Independent1 52
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 47 min black shuck 152,912
Is it possible to....... 50 min Enzo49 620
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 54 min TALLYHO 8541 37,798
More from around the web