Sandy Hook Truthers

[Sublime1]

lisawow wrote:

<quoted text>is it just me but beng a woman on here is pretty crap. Sometimes?:?:?

lisawow wrote:

<quoted text>less guns means less gun violence whe you have a an argument that disproves that reply...meanwhile keepwatching woman hating porn and masturbating..........this is the thing tou gun loving retards never get we.......and I mean women DO NOT RESPECT YOU1

You sound really angry. You insult everyone who has a view that differs from you, go off on insulting tangents about porn, masturbation, size, and who women do or do not respect, as if you, lisawow, have been appointed to speak on behalf of ALL women of the world.

First newsflash ... you aren’t a spokesperson for women when it comes to who they do or don't respect... you’re just an individual, who happens to have a snatch … this doesn’t make you special or a spokesperson for all individuals with snatches, even though you’d like to think so. Women come in all shapes and forms.

Second newsflash, in terms of pictures, not everyone is desperate enough that they have to come on here to pick up folks … some folks can actually do this without having to resort to the power of the internet. Not using a picture doesn’t mean that someone is necessarily ugly. Some folks are more private than others. Similarly, using a picture doesn’t mean someone is attractive. More importantly, looks should not be the primary way to value a person. I think it is natural to mean something in the context of a sexual relationship, but outside of that, including on topix, it shouldn’t be used as a sword.

Outside of the context of a sexual relationship, I will not adversely judge the whole of a person based on physical attractiveness (including you), but I will judge them on their behavior and personality, which brings us to the third newsflash:

Regardless of what you think you are on the hotness scale (other than to say I've had better from the Asian Persuasion and without tude, I have no comment), your attitude knocks you down by a good 3 or 4 notches (helpful tip ... if you ply a guy with a good 6 to 7 beers you may possibly be able to counteract this effect ;p). You should perhaps reconsider how you behave, and perhaps you would not be so horny...

With this insulting business to the side, I point out that squawking, aka b1tching, about how less guns means less violence and how a 4 year knows this, is completely useless. After all, there is a document known as the Constitution, which has been interpreted by the Supreme Court as affording Americans with the RIGHT to bear arms for lawful purposes ... including self-defense in one's home.

Absent amending the constitution (good luck with that) or stacking the court and overturning many years of precedent (good luck with that) what the government can do to lessen the amount of guns in society for lawful purposes, is very limited. Your b1tching about it and insulting folks who have views that differ from you, isn’t going to change this. It’s like b1tching about how the sun causes cancer and doing nothing to advance solutions in terms of how to prevent this from happening. You’ve already provided unfavorable insight into your personality and now you’ve done the same regarding your intellect…

[okimar]

But wrote:

<quoted text>Could be a lot of liberal shenanigans with a "card". Wanna bet all the illegals have a "card" within a year??? I mean, if Obama/Holder can run guns across the border with absolutely no reprisal, then, well, you know.

Two things..

1. A picture will be required on the card. And we ALL know how libs feel about photo ID on ANYTHING connected with rights or illegals.

2. An indepth background check,mental health history/treatment included,would disqualify many who could pass a check now. Including many libs. Which is why so many are FOR gun control.... The only glitch I see would be the ACLU crying about denying someone their "right" to a gun because they couldn't pass a B/G check the LIBS are so bent on. Gotta love the irony.

[Ferrerman]

I think there should be a photo ID for trolls on Topix! That might put an end to these fake brother/sister *twins* as well as phony combat veterans.

But, ya never know.

[okimar]

Ferrerman wrote:

I think there should be a photo ID for trolls on Topix! That might put an end to these fake brother/sister *twins* as well as phony combat veterans.
But, ya never know.

Line forms on the left for you sh1theel. No cutting line or Geno will whack your pee-pee. Oh wait,you might kinda like that.(feel free to use that goofy looking picture you have)

[Selective Service]

Ferrerman wrote:

I think there should be a photo ID for trolls on Topix! That might put an end to these fake brother/sister *twins* as well as phony combat veterans.
But, ya never know.

And when exactly did you serve? You probably didn't even register with us, pu ssy. That's OK though, someone with actual balls took your place. Probably better for us all.

[okimar]

Selective Service wrote:

<quoted text>And when exactly did you serve? You probably didn't even register with us, pu ssy. That's OK though, someone with actual balls took your place. Probably better for us all.

Now don't bee too hard on sh1theel fairyman. He had......issues...that prevented him from well,you know.

[justaguess]

okimar wrote:

<quoted text>Two things..
1. A picture will be required on the card. And we ALL know how libs feel about photo ID on ANYTHING connected with rights or illegals.
2. An indepth background check,mental health history/treatment included,would disqualify many who could pass a check now. Including many libs. Which is why so many are FOR gun control.... The only glitch I see would be the ACLU crying about denying someone their "right" to a gun because they couldn't pass a B/G check the LIBS are so bent on. Gotta love the irony.

Yeah..and don't forget the free bus rides to all the gun shows..!

[okimar]

justaguess wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah..and don't forget the free bus rides to all the gun shows..!

Actually,at some of the larger ones where parking is vast the sponsors will set up a shuttle system for those who have to park in the south 40.

[dragoon70056]

lisawow wrote:

<quoted text>dull, stupid. And boring''''''kind of the story of your life eh sweetie

Actually, reading your posts bragging about Canada's education system while making spelling error after spelling error is quiet entertaining.

[dragoon70056]

okimar wrote:

<quoted text>Now don't bee too hard on sh1theel fairyman. He had......issues...that prevented him from well,you know.

But "don't ask don't tell" has since been rescinded. I wonder if he has enlisted yet.

[Ferrerman]

HA! Says the stolen valor Oki married to BILLY!!!!

[okimar]

Ferrerman wrote:

HA! Says the stolen valor Oki married to BILLY!!!!

Ain't it getting past your bedtime sh1theel? Just to jog your weak memory I married to Princess. Billy is her Brother. And we are ALL amazed at your obscession with us. You must not have much of a life fixated on us as you are. Hunt up Geno and sniff his azz for a while and give ours a rest.

[okimar]

dragoon70056 wrote:

<quoted text>
But "don't ask don't tell" has since been rescinded. I wonder if he has enlisted yet.

Not much chance of that. Despite Obama's attempt to ruin the military it still has standards.

[dragoon70056]

okimar wrote:

<quoted text>Ain't it getting past your bedtime sh1theel? Just to jog your weak memory I married to Princess. Billy is her Brother. And we are ALL amazed at your obscession with us. You must not have much of a life fixated on us as you are. Hunt up Geno and sniff his azz for a while and give ours a rest.

Ferretman don't sleep. He's got too much fluffing to do.

[Naturally Wired]

lisawow wrote:

<quoted text>less guns, less gun violence, have a 4year ol explain. It

That's only true to a certain point and maybe in some places. Crime, gun crime, all crime has alot of varying issues behind why it happens and it varies from place to place in this world.

I'm not sure as a Canadian if you know anything about guns in our own country. There is an estimated 9 million firearms known to be legally owned in Canada. That's quite a number in a nation of only 35 mill people, and remember 'known' to be legally owned. The majority are hunting rifles, but there are a number of handgun owners and also some semi-auto weapons are allowed in Canada.

I live in aplace where hunting is popular and a way of life. Guns are all around me. I just moved from a place with the same thing. I was also born in a province that had guns in just about every household. Yet there is not much gun crime, so there goes the theory you have about less guns=less gun crime.

The problems surrounding gun crime in the US is not necessarily guns themselves, I just pointed out how we have guns(and there's other countries with guns too and less gun crime) but many other issues in the US such as social issues which includes poverty issues-economic issues, criminals gaining access to guns, better access to mental health care including the authorities knowing who should not have a gun, illegal immigration, criminals who shouldn't be paroled, etc..many other issues surrounding gun crime.

Of course I would agree with good gun control, but to blame guns alone and the many law abiding Americans who own guns and never commit crime is ridiculous.
Remember how the past liberal govt here started the long gun registry, picking on law abiding Canadian farmers, hunters, and gun collectors because of the shootings scumbags do in the urban cities?....It doesn't work, and thankfully this wasteful registry was stopped by our current conservative govt.

Have a good day. You should get some help with that horny thing.

[Sublime1]

Naturally Wired wrote:

<quoted text>
The problems surrounding gun crime in the US is not necessarily guns themselves, I just pointed out how we have guns(and there's other countries with guns too and less gun crime) but many other issues in the US such as social issues which includes poverty issues-economic issues, criminals gaining access to guns, better access to mental health care including the authorities knowing who should not have a gun, illegal immigration, criminals who shouldn't be paroled, etc..many other issues surrounding gun crime.
Of course I would agree with good gun control, but to blame guns alone and the many law abiding Americans who own guns and never commit crime is ridiculous.

Spot on. 2/3rds of gun crimes are in LARGE metropolitan areas and in the inner city portions of those areas, I.e. ghetto. The majority of victims range from their teens to their early 20s and are black ... I would wager most of the killers are of the same demographic.

Per capita, I would bet any amount that those areas tend to have less guns than rural areas too ... yet rural areas have very few gun crimes.

[Ohio Cowgirl]

lisawow wrote:

<quoted text>is it just me but beng a woman on here is pretty crap. Sometimes?:?:?

True but it makes these guys who fight us feel all big and bad that they fight with women..

lmao!! I have 5 brothers and 3 sons so it doesn't bother me..:)

[Ohio Cowgirl]

okimar wrote:

<quoted text>I never said YOU did. I expect you wouldn't. But there have been others who have. I meant no offense,if it seemed so I'm sorry. It just gripes my azz that there were sh1theel libs who would actually use for political/propaganda reasons a brave man's killing.

Thank you for the apology.

You obviously have a problem with Libs, so be it thats your choice but this is Americas problem..all of us..

[Ohio Cowgirl]

I Wish wrote:

I sure wish liberals held the same philosophy about spending that they hold about guns: Less is better. I might actually give you one of my guns if you'd quit running up the debt. The broken one that's missing the firing pin.

We have to pay the debt caused by two wars Bush wanted... sorry.

[Ohio Cowgirl]

No Thanks wrote:

<quoted text>You can keep your "Hope & Change" (or is it FORWARD now?). I'll keep my guns and my cash, thanks.

If you're buying those guns and ammo at a premium price now you're not doing either....Sucker!!