what does all your name calling do for you besides make you look foolish. make you feel all warm and fuzzy on the inside? all tingly? LOL<quoted text>
A source would have been nice. But even if you found one evolutionary change is not demanded by the theory of evolution. That is not evidence against the theory of evolution.
Faith, by definition, is not evidence. It is belief in spite of a lack of evidence.
And you are the one that is claiming there might be some validity for gods. That puts the burden of proof upon you.
I never ignored it moron. I pointed out that it was a stupid question from the start. Why would science want to test for god?
And telling you that you asked an idiotic question and showing how it is idiotic, which I have done multiple times, is not ducking your question.
No I didn't you idiot. Now you are lying. I said if you want to claim something exists it is up to you to provide evidence. You are probably too dense to understand the difference.
Wrong again. Time to pull your head out of your ass. It is not a trick. It simply shows how foolish your unsupported beliefs are. You want us to believe in your god that is not supported by evidence and yet you cannot explain how your god is different in any way from Russell's Magic Teapot.
when debating one must remember "it is not the man, but the measure, that is the subject of debate.” name calling only shows weakness: General Henry M. Robert, U.S. Army- Roberts Rules of Order 1876.
there are two intellectually-honest debate tactics:
1) pointing out errors or omissions in your opponent’s facts
2) pointing out errors or omissions in your opponent’s logic
all other debate tactics(ridicule, names, etc) are intellectually dishonest: General Henry M. Robert, U.S. Army- Roberts Rules of Order 1876.
your favorite which you use all the time is argumentum ad hominem because you resort to name calling and attacking the person just as much if not more than the topic. pat yourself on the back. lol