You're lying about Pasteur's law again. You're also lying about you not being refuted. It was referring to the spontaneous appearance of fully-formed organisms, such as maggots that appeared in a dead carcass, as people back then didn't consider that all that happened was flies laid eggs in it. It mentioned NOTHING about the gradual development of life via natural chemical processes, something which happens every single day all over the planet.
In other words, Pasteur presented a falsification of creationism.
So just to remind you AGAIN - EVERYTHING in your body is made up of what was once previously "dead" non-living chemicals. Carbon is not alive. Iron is not alive. Calcium is not alive.
They came together via natural chemical processes. Ergo life came from non-life.
You always ignore the fact that the hypothesis of abiogenesis is the only origin of life idea which made successful scientific predictions, such as the building blocks of life being able to form naturally, and the earliest records of biology in the geological record are biochemistry followed by microscopic protocells, before they developed further in accordance to evolution. Ergo life came from non-life.
Both the Earth and the universe are finite. There is no evidence of life prior to 3.8 billion years ago. No evidence of anything "beyond" our universe as of yet, nor evidence that "life" could deliberately intervene in our universe even if there was something there. In short, there's no evidence life COULD exist prior to those points because there's no evidence of any environments being able to sustain any kind of life in the first place.
All lifeforms are carbon-based organisms based on organic chemistry. God is claimed to be an invisible magic spirit. There's no evidence of this.
All lifeforms are subject to entropy. God is claimed to be a magic immortal. There's no evidence of this.
All intelligent organisms require a brain or collection of neurons as an equivalent for any kind of intelligence processes to function. God is claimed to be an invisible magic spirit that doesn't need brains. There's no evidence of this.
When we go to heaven we have to be dead. God is claimed to be a "living spirit". There's no evidence of any of this. Plus this is a SERIOUS inconsistency in creationist theology that's never been addressed and must be ignored for theological convenience.
All organisms reproduce via natural chemical processes. God is claimed to have made man artificially. So your "life from life" chain is broken. Plus there's no evidence of any of this.
Notice how it's YOUR position which requires all sorts of exceptions to physics or current observations, and ours require NONE.
By the way, the theory of evolution does not rely on abiogenesis.(shrug)
Pasteur presented a falsification of creationism.
Unless Pasteur attributed the spontaneous generation to G-d, then he made a falsification of abiogenesis. No problem for scientists, they just blame it upon ignorance.
You always ignore the fact that the hypothesis of abiogenesis is the only origin of life idea which made successful scientific predictions, such as the building blocks of life being able to form naturally, and the earliest records of biology in the geological record are biochemistry followed by microscopic protocells.
What are you calling a protocell, something that is not a cell. It would have to predict that a cell would form at some time. Do we have any evidence of this?
By the way, the theory of evolution does not rely on abiogenesis.(shrug).
Can you explain how life can evolve if abiogensis never happened? Please give evidence for your position.
By the way G-d can cure you of that nervous tick (shrug) you have.