Caps is shouting in computer speak.I didn't shout, I just used capitals because you apparently are not able to read properly when using underscore.
What historic evidence? You have not produced any. You mean the Bible which is compiled writings from the ancients? That is a prime example of confirmation bias which rejects evidence which does not fit their assumptions. It is the same reason the moderns rejected historical Jesus and David. Both are established from history and both have genealogies which go back through Noah to Adam. So 500 years ago, two thousand years ago and three thousand + years ago you have multiple sourced recorded history validating Noah and Adam. From the time of David.is about 2500 years ago. 1 Chr. 1. Nothing which refutes.Also the historic evidence makes mishmash of your bronze age mythology stories.
No, I don't take evidence form mythology books.
Like most you are no doubt biblically illiterate. Two things the Bible was right on and the moderns were wrong on. Jesus and David as historical. Both come from the Bible.
You mean you only accept evidence which validates your assumptions.I only accept scientific evidence.
If it did we would not hear it from folks like you. So you trash all existing written evidence for evidence which only a handful sill understand. Why believe them when they were wrong on David and Jesus?Are you implying then that a worldwide flood would not leave any geological traces then?
Yeah you have multiple accounts and you dismiss it all as myth.Hence, I need geological evidence INDEED.
And if you are not able to deliver it, there WAS NO WORLDWIDE FLOOD. Just as simple.
Otherwise, it is just a myth from the many myths written in the bronze age by the many bronze age people. We have a bunch of books of these: Gilgamesh Epic, Upanishads, Rig Vedas, Greek Mythology etc.
I gave you the evidence from history. You rejected because of metaphysical prejudice and confirmation bias. You are up against two heavy hitters. Jesus and Moses. Josephus and Philo. All these are wrong and you are right?Many of them even older than the bible.
All filled to the brim with "stories" and "accounts" of "ancients" who experienced all kinds of "events which predated their writings".
You are not relying on evidence but on revelation.
Hence the question again: WHERE is you EVIDENCE?
Got to go to Creation Scientists because all others ignore or explain away evidence which does not fit their assumptions. Soft tissue in 65 million year dino bones.