". equivalency, parity, correspondence, SAMENESS; justice,***FAIRNESS***, impartiality. " [http://dictionary.reference.c om/browse/equality]
" TO BE SIMILAR TO OR THE SAME AS something"
But all you have done is suggest that what I claimed has no meaning and and then suggested the same thing that I mean and behave as if it means something.<quoted text>
Sorry, but your definitions were of no help. Once again, I see no way that 'conforming' can modify the word 'equality'. Two things are either equal or they are not. If they are equal, I would say they 'conform to equality' and if they are not equal, I would say that they do not 'conform to equality'. That is clearly NOT what you are meaning, but I cannot find any actual meaning in your words...
equality + conform = "TO BE SIMILAR TO OR THE SAME AS" + "equivalency"
To conform to equality suggests "to be similar to (that which has) equivalency."
How is that much different from "If they are equal, I would say they 'conform to equality' "?
You thought pattern is quite in-equitous.