Again, you are not the one that sets the standards on what is observation. Where ate the day by day photographs of you? That is a ridiculous request I made, you should have recognized it as such. Just as your step by step is a ridiculous request. The fossil record is by its nature fragmentary. We will never have a step by step picture. But every new fossil found makes the picture clearer. And more important each fossil found supports the theory of evolution.<quoted text>
standards are limits. science is limited. we have never "observed evidence of non-human to human evolution, step by step, all steps of the way"
to say we have observed non-human to human evolution is nothing more than a word game with idiots. similarities have been observed and that is all. it may be 80% similarities in the fossil record but that is still not actually observing non-human to human evolution.
creationists say that observes nothing but past fossils, which in a way is true. but those fossils tell a partial story(not full story) from the past up to the present.
again i say the alphabet is complete observed when it is a-z. missing any letter/letters makes it an incomplete alphabet. no matter how much it resembles an alphabet, it is only observed similar to an alphabet.
You don't get to set the standards. Now they may not be high enough for you, but all that means is that you are a lying creatard and nothing more.