Sure, Tee. Except for the fact we pointed a whole bunch of them to ya weeks ago.(shrug)The entire history of evolution from the evolution of life from non-life to the evolution of vertebrates from invertebrates to the evolution of man from the ape is strikingly devoid of intermediates: the links are all missing in the fossil record, just as they are in the present world.
By the way, the theory of evolution (still) doesn't rely on abiogenesis.
Oh, the irony.Way to dodge the question.
Yes it does. That's because it accounts for new evidence when it is discovered. This is the difference between science and religious dogma.One thing is true the "Theory of Evolution" constantly evolves.
What you mean is you are unable to refute our evidence so you're ranting and are now forced to attack us with baseless rhetoric.When a cult evolutionist is faced with an incovenient fact they make up some BS to further their evolutionary tales.
No, YOU are a God-hater. We know this because you still haven't apologized for when you got caught lying. Also at least one of us on this thread is an evolution-accepting Christian. And there are a few others on the forum. So they don't hate God either. As for any non-believers they don't hate what they consider to be a fictional entity.Face it you are a two bit hater of the God of the universe and you use evolutionism to justify your hatred.
What we do not like are liars for Jesus like you who think it's okay to ignore the First Amendment, ignore their own Second Commandment and ruin public school education by pushing your baseless religious opinions onto other people's kids.
But thanks for admitting your uh, "scientific alternative" is not scientific.