I hate when people say i dont know what a scientific theory is it is something that has been tested enough that it can be used to describe a certain phenomenon correctly but however it does not say that the theory is 100% true as science isnt perfect and it does has some minor flaws such as theories that have been made but then disproven and as i a christian do not believe in evolution and will not ever until i can see with my own eyes that something turns into something else or let me re phrase that, that something gains new benificial data/info through theire different mutations and a long process of natural selection<quoted text>There is no 100% backed up evidence that fossilization occurs rapidly. That bear and all the other items that have been intentionally encased in stone are the result of a process called concretion. It is not fossilization. Concretion is a common process and cultural artifacts associated with water are often coated with a layer of accumulated minerals. Minerals leached from the stony substrate of still or moving water precipitate out of solution and coat objects that are placed in the water.
Again fossils support evolution, but they are more evidence by themselves than anything that supports fundamentalist views of a young earth.
Obviously you are new to this and have little or no understanding what "theory" means in science. A theory is an explanation of why things are the way they are and is supported by evidence. Evolution has the support of nearly 200 years worth of evidence that has continually supported the theory. It has been accept by science for nearly 150 years.
It is laughable that some people will believe any bullshit they are told by someone claiming it is backed by the Bible, but a real scientific explanation backed by evidence, they consider mumbo jumbo.
As an example we have a very good series of fossils leading from the ancestral horse genus, Eohippus to the modern horse genus Equus with intermediates in between the two. We have a similar series for whale evolution and for reptile to mammal evolution. Not that these examples will be accepted by you. You would rather believe that the Noah road around on a dinosaur despite the fact that dinosaurs aren't mentioned in the Bible and there is no evidence they coexisted with humans.
But as i have not been given any of this supposed "proof" that you all say there is you will not easily persuade me in any way (and yes i know that last part sounded pretty stuborn, but i am intitled to my own opinion).
And lets face it science has been miss"analaysed" in the past and things have been changed for example we used to think the atom could not be diveded then we got the atom bomb and another example we used to think the earth was flat and i strongly assume that evolution will be something like those examples in the perhaps near or even distant future